Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

USB vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
USB
U.S. Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$86.46B
5Y Perf.+56.4%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$834.20B
5Y Perf.+218.0%

USB vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
USB logoUSB
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$86.46B$834.20B
Revenue (TTM)$42.86B$270.79B
Net Income (TTM)$7.58B$58.03B
Gross Margin62.8%58.6%
Operating Margin22.2%27.7%
Forward P/E10.9x13.9x
Total Debt$77.93B$751.15B
Cash & Equiv.$46.89B$469.32B

USB vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

USB
JPM
StockMay 20May 26Return
U.S. Bancorp (USB)100156.4+56.4%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100318.0+218.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: USB vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. U.S. Bancorp is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
USB
U.S. Bancorp
The Banking Pick

USB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.01
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 2.73x
  • NIM 2.4% vs JPM's 2.3%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 21.7%
  • 466.1% 10Y total return vs USB's 73.6%
  • PEG 1.07 vs USB's 1.28
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM14.6% NII/revenue growth vs USB's 0.3%
ValueUSB logoUSBLower P/E (10.9x vs 13.9x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs USB's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 1.00 vs USB's 1.01
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.7% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)USB logoUSB+39.1% vs JPM's +24.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs USB's 0.4%

USB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

USBU.S. Bancorp
FY 2024
Wealth Management And Investment Services
41.2%$12.2B
Consumer And Small Business Banking
31.3%$9.3B
Payment Services
31.1%$9.2B
Treasury and Corporate Support
-3.5%$-1,031,000,000
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2024
Consumer & Community Banking
40.3%$71.5B
Commercial And Investment Bank
39.5%$70.1B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
12.2%$21.6B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
9.8%$17.4B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,037,000,000

USB vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGUSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — USB and JPM each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 6.3x USB's $42.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.6% (JPM) to 17.7% (USB).

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$42.9B$270.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$10.3B$81.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7.6B$58.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5.1B-$119.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.8%+58.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.2%+27.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.7%+21.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-15.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.8%+16.0%
Evenly matched — USB and JPM each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

USB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.1x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 23% valuation discount to JPM's 15.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.21x vs USB's 1.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$86.5B$834.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$117.5B$1.12T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.06x15.67x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.93x13.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.41x1.21x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.42x13.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.02x3.08x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.32x2.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
USB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $12 for USB. USB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.5%+16.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.2%+5.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+8.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.19x2.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$31.0B$281.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$46.9B$469.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$77.9B$751.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.66x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,811 for USB. Over the past 12 months, USB leads with a +39.1% total return vs JPM's +24.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.4% vs USB's 26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.1%-4.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+39.1%+24.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+100.4%+137.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+8.1%+111.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+73.6%+466.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.1%+33.4%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USB's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.01x1.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$61.19$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$40.89$248.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.9%+91.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.051.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9.1M8.5M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates USB as "Hold" and JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.8% upside for USB (target: $64) vs 9.5% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.66% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricUSB logoUSBU.S. BancorpJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$63.82$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts4961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1414
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). USB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

USB vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is USB or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — USB or JPM?

On trailing P/E, U.

S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 15. 7x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 07x versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 28x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — USB or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +111. 1%, compared to +8. 1% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +466. 1% versus USB's +73. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — USB or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning USB is approximately 1% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Bancorp (USB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — USB or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to 21. 6% for U. S. Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — USB or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 17. 7% for U. S. Bancorp — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 22. 2% for USB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is USB or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 07x versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 28x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USB: 14. 8% to $63. 82.

08

Which pays a better dividend — USB or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

7% yield) pays a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is USB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +466. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +466. 1%, USB: +73. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between USB and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

JPM pays a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

USB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JPM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform USB and JPM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(USB: 0.3% · JPM: 14.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(USB: 17.7% · JPM: 21.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(USB: 12.1x · JPM: 15.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.