Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
USB vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
USB vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $86.46B | $834.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.86B | $270.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.58B | $58.03B |
| Gross Margin | 62.8% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.2% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $77.93B | $751.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46.89B | $469.32B |
USB vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Bancorp (USB) | 100 | 156.4 | +56.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 318.0 | +218.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USB vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.01
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 2.73x
- NIM 2.4% vs JPM's 2.3%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 21.7%
- 466.1% 10Y total return vs USB's 73.6%
- PEG 1.07 vs USB's 1.28
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs USB's 0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs USB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs USB's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.1% vs JPM's +24.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs USB's 0.4% |
USB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
USB vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — USB and JPM each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 6.3x USB's $42.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.6% (JPM) to 17.7% (USB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42.9B | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.3B | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.6B | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.1B | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.8% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
USB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 23% valuation discount to JPM's 15.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.21x vs USB's 1.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $86.5B | $834.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $117.5B | $1.12T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.06x | 15.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.93x | 13.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.41x | 1.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.42x | 13.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.02x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $12 for USB. USB carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.19x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31.0B | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46.9B | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77.9B | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.66x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,811 for USB. Over the past 12 months, USB leads with a +39.1% total return vs JPM's +24.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.4% vs USB's 26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | -4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.1% | +24.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.4% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | +111.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.6% | +466.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.1% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USB's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.19 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.89 | $248.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.1M | 8.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates USB as "Hold" and JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.8% upside for USB (target: $64) vs 9.5% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.66% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.82 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 49 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). USB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
USB vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USB or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USB or JPM?
On trailing P/E, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 15. 7x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 07x versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 28x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USB or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +111. 1%, compared to +8. 1% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +466. 1% versus USB's +73. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USB or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning USB is approximately 1% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Bancorp (USB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USB or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus 0. 3% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to 21. 6% for U. S. Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USB or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 17. 7% for U. S. Bancorp — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 22. 2% for USB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USB or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 07x versus U. S. Bancorp's 1. 28x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USB: 14. 8% to $63. 82.
08Which pays a better dividend — USB or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is USB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +466. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +466. 1%, USB: +73. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USB and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
JPM pays a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.