Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Weibo Corporation (WB) vs Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WB | -0.3% revenue growth vs MOMO's -12.0% |
| Value | MOMO | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 5.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | WB | 21.1% net margin vs MOMO's 8.2% |
| Stability / Safety | MOMO | Beta 0.46 vs WB's 0.57, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MOMO | 8.5% yield, vs WB's 7.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WB | +2.1% vs MOMO's -12.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WB | 5.7% ROA vs MOMO's 5.2%, ROIC 10.3% vs 11.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Weibo is a Chinese social media platform where users create, share, and discover content—often described as China's Twitter. It generates revenue primarily from advertising and marketing services (~85% of revenue) and value-added services like virtual gifts and membership fees. Its competitive advantage lies in its entrenched position as China's leading microblogging platform with strong network effects and deep integration into Chinese digital life.
Hello Group operates China's leading mobile social and entertainment platforms — primarily Momo and Tantan — that connect users through location-based matching, live streaming, and dating services. It generates revenue mainly from virtual gifting in live streaming (where viewers buy digital gifts for creators), premium subscriptions for enhanced features, and mobile marketing services. The company's competitive moat lies in its massive user network effects within China's social entertainment ecosystem and its deep understanding of local user preferences for interactive, video-based social experiences.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MOMO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.5B annually — 5.9x WB's $1.8B. WB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOMO's 8.2%. On growth, WB holds the edge at +1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $10.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $535M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $372M | $854M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.2% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +12.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +11.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | -139.6% |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, MOMO trades at a 8% valuation discount to WB's 8.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WB's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MOMO's 10.0x.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $898M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $913M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.82x | 8.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.83x | 1.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.61x | 9.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.55x | 11.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WB delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for MOMO. MOMO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WB's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WB scores 7/9 vs MOMO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15M | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $4.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.11x | 14.22x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $5,960 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,306 for WB. Over the past 12 months, WB leads with a +2.1% total return vs MOMO's -12.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOMO at -3.0% vs WB's -14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.9% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.1% | -12.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.2% | -8.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.9% | -40.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.1% | -9.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.8% | -3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WB's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WB currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs MOMO's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.96 | $9.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.10 | $5.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.9% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 894K | 842K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WB as "Buy" and MOMO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.9% upside for WB (target: $17) vs 22.4% for MOMO (target: $8). For income investors, MOMO offers the higher dividend yield at 8.47% vs WB's 7.16%.
| Metric | WBWeibo Corporation | MOMOHello Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.18 | $8.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | +8.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.73 | $3.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 100 | 25.3 | -74.7% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 23.31 | -76.7% |
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) returned -40% over 5 years vs Weibo Corporation (WB)'s -77%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | $478M | $1.8B | +267.2% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | $870M | $10.6B | +1114.4% |
Weibo Corporation's revenue grew from $478M (2015) to $1.8B (2024) — a 15.5% CAGR. Hello Group Inc.'s revenue grew from $870M (2015) to $10.6B (2024) — a 32.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 7.3% | 17.1% | +135.8% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 10.2% | 9.8% | -3.7% |
Weibo Corporation's net margin went from 7% (2015) to 17% (2024). Hello Group Inc.'s net margin went from 10% (2015) to 10% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 66.3 | 8.2 | -87.6% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 2.4 | 1.4 | -41.7% |
Weibo Corporation has traded in a 8x–66x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~9x. Hello Group Inc. has traded in a 1x–3x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~8x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 0.16 | 1.16 | +625.0% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 0.39 | 5.58 | +1330.8% |
Weibo Corporation's EPS grew from $0.16 (2015) to $1.16 (2024) — a 25% CAGR. Hello Group Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.39 (2015) to $5.58 (2024) — a 34% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Weibo Corporation generated $578M FCF in 2024 (-11% vs 2021). Hello Group Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2024 (-7% vs 2021).
WB vs MOMO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WB or MOMO a better buy right now?
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 8.1x trailing P/E (1.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weibo Corporation (WB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WB or MOMO?
On trailing P/E, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the cheapest at 8.1x versus Weibo Corporation at 8.8x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WB or MOMO?
Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) delivered a total return of -40.4%, compared to -76.9% for Weibo Corporation (WB). A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth approximately $6K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOMO returned -9.5% versus WB's -16.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WB or MOMO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.46β versus Weibo Corporation's 0.57β — meaning WB is approximately 24% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 53% for Weibo Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — WB or MOMO?
Weibo Corporation (WB) is the more profitable company, earning 17.1% net margin versus 9.8% for Hello Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 17.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WB leads at 28.2% versus 14.5% for MOMO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WB leads at 78.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WB or MOMO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) trades at 1.1x forward P/E versus 5.8x for Weibo Corporation — 4.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WB: 67.9% to $17.18.
07Which pays a better dividend — WB or MOMO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the highest yield at 8.5%, versus 7.2% for Weibo Corporation (WB).
08Is WB or MOMO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.46), 8.5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9.5%, WB: -16.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WB and MOMO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 12%
- Dividend Yield > 2.8%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 5%
- Dividend Yield > 3.3%