Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) vs Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WULF | 102.3% revenue growth vs BMNR's 84.1% |
| Quality / Margins | BMNR | 57.2% net margin vs WULF's -51.7% |
| Stability / Safety | BMNR | Beta 2.38 vs WULF's 2.58 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WULF | +287.1% vs BMNR's +251.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WULF | -23.0% ROA vs BMNR's -42.3%, ROIC -10.6% vs 7.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
TeraWulf is a bitcoin mining company that develops, owns, and operates large-scale mining facilities in the United States. It generates revenue primarily from bitcoin mining rewards — converting electricity into digital assets — with additional income from hosting services for other miners. The company's competitive advantage lies in its access to low-cost, sustainable energy sources — particularly nuclear and hydroelectric power — which gives it superior mining economics.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies operates as a blockchain infrastructure company that hosts cryptocurrency mining equipment for third parties and engages in self-mining for its own account. It generates revenue primarily from hosting fees paid by clients for mining equipment operation—including power, cooling, and security services—and from mining rewards earned through its own operations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized data center infrastructure with proprietary thermodynamic management systems that optimize mining efficiency and reduce energy costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
BMNR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WULF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WULF is the larger business by revenue, generating $140M annually — 23.0x BMNR's $6M. BMNR is the more profitable business, keeping 57.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WULF's -51.7%.
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | BMNRBitmine Immersion… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $6M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$72M | $224M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$564M | -$4.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$677M | -$234M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +5.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -54.4% | +72.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -51.7% | +57.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -85.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.7% | -11051.7% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | BMNRBitmine Immersion… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.1B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -77.24x | 1.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 50.87x | 1272.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 23.31x | 0.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMNR delivers a -43.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-2 for WULF. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMNR scores 4/9 vs WULF's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | BMNRBitmine Immersion… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | -43.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.0% | -42.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.6% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.9% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $217M | -$512M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $274M | $512M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $491M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.06x | -12890.65x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WULF five years ago would be worth $21,413 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $601 for BMNR. Over the past 12 months, WULF leads with a +287.1% total return vs BMNR's +251.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WULF at 193.7% vs BMNR's -1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | BMNRBitmine Immersion… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.3% | -39.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +287.1% | +251.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2434.4% | -5.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.1% | -94.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.6% | -50.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +193.7% | -1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
BMNR is the less volatile stock with a 2.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WULF's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WULF currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs BMNR's 11.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | BMNRBitmine Immersion… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.58x | 2.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.51 | $161.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.06 | $3.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.6% | +11.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 41.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24.9M | 36.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WULF as "Buy" and BMNR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 105.5% upside for BMNR (target: $39) vs 38.7% for WULF (target: $23).
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | BMNRBitmine Immersion… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | $39.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 100 | 423.97 | +324.0% |
| Bitmine Immersion T… (BMNR) | 60.81 | 77.03 | +26.7% |
TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) returned +114% over 5 years vs Bitmine Immersion T… (BMNR)'s -94%. A $10,000 investment in WULF 5 years ago would be worth $21,413 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | $18M | $140M | +697.1% |
| Bitmine Immersion T… (BMNR) | $0.00 | $6M | — |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 0.8% | -51.7% | -6826.7% |
| Bitmine Immersion T… (BMNR) | -4.7% | 57.2% | +1319.7% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | -0.03 | -0.21 | -552.2% |
| Bitmine Immersion T… (BMNR) | -0 | 13.39 | +1673850.0% |
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
TeraWulf Inc. generated $-292M FCF in 2024 (-120% vs 2021). Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. generated $-5M FCF in 2025 (-935% vs 2021).
WULF vs BMNR: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WULF or BMNR a better buy right now?
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) offers the better valuation at 1.4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WULF or BMNR?
Over the past 5 years, TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) delivered a total return of +114.1%, compared to -94.0% for Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR). A $10,000 investment in WULF five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WULF returned +77.6% versus BMNR's -50.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WULF or BMNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) is the lower-risk stock at 2.38β versus TeraWulf Inc.'s 2.58β — meaning WULF is approximately 8% more volatile than BMNR relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — WULF or BMNR?
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) is the more profitable company, earning 57.2% net margin versus -51.7% for TeraWulf Inc. — meaning it keeps 57.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMNR leads at 72.9% versus -54.4% for WULF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WULF leads at 55.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — WULF or BMNR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is WULF or BMNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) carries a higher beta of 2.38 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WULF: +77.6%, BMNR: -50.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between WULF and BMNR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: WULF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BMNR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.