Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WULF | 102.3% revenue growth vs JPM's 14.6% |
| Quality / Margins | JPM | 21.6% net margin vs WULF's -51.7% |
| Stability / Safety | JPM | Beta 1.00 vs WULF's 2.58 |
| Dividends | JPM | 1.7% yield; 14-year raise streak; WULF pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WULF | +287.1% vs JPM's +15.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | JPM | 1.3% ROA vs WULF's -23.0%, ROIC 5.4% vs -10.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
TeraWulf is a bitcoin mining company that develops, owns, and operates large-scale mining facilities in the United States. It generates revenue primarily from bitcoin mining rewards — converting electricity into digital assets — with additional income from hosting services for other miners. The company's competitive advantage lies in its access to low-cost, sustainable energy sources — particularly nuclear and hydroelectric power — which gives it superior mining economics.
JPMorgan Chase is a global financial services giant that operates as a universal bank offering consumer banking, investment banking, commercial banking, and asset management services. It generates revenue primarily through net interest income from lending activities (about 50% of total revenue) and non-interest income from investment banking fees, trading, asset management, and card services. The company's key competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, diversified revenue streams, and fortress balance sheet—which together create significant barriers to entry and provide stability through economic cycles.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). WULF leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 1933.5x WULF's $140M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WULF's -51.7%.
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$72M | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$564M | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$677M | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -54.4% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -51.7% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.7% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.1B | $809.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -77.24x | 15.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 50.87x | 2.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 23.31x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for WULF. WULF carries lower financial leverage with a 2.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs WULF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.6% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.9% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $217M | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $274M | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $491M | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.06x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,449 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,413 for WULF. Over the past 12 months, WULF leads with a +287.1% total return vs JPM's +15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WULF at 193.7% vs JPM's 30.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.3% | -7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +287.1% | +15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2434.4% | +119.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.1% | +114.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.6% | +497.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +193.7% | +30.0% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WULF's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.58x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.51 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.06 | $202.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.6% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24.9M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WULF as "Buy" and JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.7% upside for WULF (target: $23) vs 11.9% for JPM (target: $336). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | WULFTeraWulf Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | $336.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +3.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 100 | 257.97 | +158.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 263.46 | +163.5% |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) returned +114% over 5 years vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)'s +114%. A $10,000 investment in JPM 5 years ago would be worth $21,449 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | $18M | $140M | +697.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | $101.0B | $270.8B | +168.1% |
TeraWulf Inc.'s revenue grew from $18M (2015) to $140M (2024) — a 25.9% CAGR. JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s revenue grew from $101.0B (2015) to $270.8B (2024) — a 11.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 0.8% | -51.7% | -6826.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 24.2% | 21.6% | -10.8% |
TeraWulf Inc.'s net margin went from 1% (2015) to -52% (2024). JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s net margin went from 24% (2015) to 22% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 16.9 | 12.1 | -28.4% |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. has traded in a 10x–17x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 0.07 | -0.21 | -413.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 6 | 19.75 | +229.2% |
TeraWulf Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.07 (2015) to $-0.21 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR. JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s EPS grew from $6.00 (2015) to $19.75 (2024) — a 14% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
TeraWulf Inc. generated $-292M FCF in 2024 (-120% vs 2021). JPMorgan Chase & Co. generated $-42B FCF in 2024 (-154% vs 2021).
WULF vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WULF or JPM a better buy right now?
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15.2x trailing P/E (13.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WULF or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) delivered a total return of +114.5%, compared to +114.1% for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +497.7% versus WULF's +77.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WULF or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.00β versus TeraWulf Inc.'s 2.58β — meaning WULF is approximately 157% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — WULF or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21.6% net margin versus -51.7% for TeraWulf Inc. — meaning it keeps 21.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27.7% versus -54.4% for WULF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 58.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is WULF or JPM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WULF: 38.7% to $22.50.
06Which pays a better dividend — WULF or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.7% yield) pays a dividend. WULF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is WULF or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.00), 1.7% yield, +497.7% 10Y return). TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) carries a higher beta of 2.58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +497.7%, WULF: +77.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WULF and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: WULF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while WULF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.