Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 186.1x · EV/EBITDA 5.4x · ROE 0.5%. (2010–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.8B | $5.4B | $6.2B | $7.2B | $4.4B | $2.6B | $741M | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $9.1B | $6.7B | $7.2B | $7.4B | $4.3B | $2.9B | $1.0B | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 186.11 | 125.27 | 7.30 | 7.07 | 2.38 | 8.14 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.59 | 1.10 | 1.17 | 1.85 | 1.21 | 1.65 | 0.68 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.99 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 1.42 | 0.94 | 2.13 | 0.73 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 11.19 | 7.74 | 6.72 | 7.89 | 3.17 | 3.72 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 3.80 | 2.63 | 2.94 | 3.96 | 2.29 | 2.85 | 2.48 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.91 | 1.18 | 1.81 | 0.93 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.43 | 4.00 | 3.25 | 3.97 | 2.21 | 2.96 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 45.69 | 20.63 | 6.14 | 5.43 | 3.05 | 13.10 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 9.64 | 7.81 | 8.13 | 3.09 | 4.10 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 6.5% | 6.5% | 24.9% | 36.9% | 49.1% | 42.4% | 22.2% | 4.2% | 26.8% | 95.6% | 96.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 4.1% | 20.9% | 32.7% | 43.4% | 51.2% | -449.8% | -4.7% | 5.1% | 11.5% | -18.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 0.9% | 0.9% | 16.2% | 26.3% | 50.9% | 20.2% | -340.6% | -6.6% | -1.5% | 9.9% | -71.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.5% | 0.5% | 12.3% | 21.0% | 62.9% | 28.6% | -152.2% | -3.3% | -0.9% | 3.8% | -19.1% |
| ROA | 0.3% | 0.3% | 8.5% | 15.1% | 38.4% | 12.3% | -76.4% | -1.7% | -0.5% | 1.9% | -8.3% |
| ROIC | 1.6% | 1.6% | 11.0% | 19.3% | 39.2% | 43.8% | -92.9% | -1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | -2.0% |
| ROCE | 1.7% | 1.7% | 12.9% | 23.1% | 44.8% | 44.7% | -111.8% | -1.3% | 1.8% | 2.3% | -2.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.79 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.47 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.45 | — | 3.97 | 3.62 | 3.11 | 6.65 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.04 | -0.02 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.78 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.46 | 0.12 | -0.05 | 0.27 | — | 3.95 | 3.59 | 3.08 | 6.62 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.90 | 1.10 | 0.24 | -0.07 | 0.38 | — | 116.36 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 4.04 | 4.04 | 20.68 | 47.77 | 48.14 | 7.10 | -26.84 | -1.13 | 0.83 | 0.48 | -1.65 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.94 | 1.22 | 1.09 | 1.32 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.63 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.88 | 1.16 | 1.05 | 1.29 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.60 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.11 |
| Inventory Turnover | 39.43 | 39.43 | 41.84 | 33.89 | 34.12 | 31.42 | 39.00 | 52.49 | 51.27 | 2.83 | 2.44 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 83.57 | 90.29 | 88.34 | 78.24 | 87.14 | 68.14 | 70.17 | 60.93 | 106.30 | 105.84 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.0% | 5.9% | 8.6% | 6.9% | 7.9% | 4.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 714.7% | 714.7% | 62.4% | 48.9% | 18.7% | 35.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.5% | 0.8% | 13.7% | 14.1% | 42.1% | 12.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 8.9% | 12.9% | 14.9% | 12.7% | 31.6% | 26.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.7% | 6.8% | 7.2% | 3.3% | 4.4% | 3.8% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.7% | 12.7% | 15.8% | 10.3% | 12.3% | 8.1% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $58M | $53M | $43M | $32M | $21M | $20M | $20M | $315M | $238M | $184M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CHRD stock.
Chord Energy Corporation's current P/E ratio is 186.1x. The historical average is 30.0x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Chord Energy Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 5.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 3.3x.
Chord Energy Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 0.5%. The historical average is 2.1%.
Based on historical data, Chord Energy Corporation is trading at a P/E of 186.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Chord Energy Corporation's current dividend yield is 3.99% with a payout ratio of 714.7%.
Chord Energy Corporation has 6.5% gross margin and 4.1% operating margin.
Chord Energy Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Thin margins and integration risks
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Fragility
Gross margin swung from 10.4% in Q4 2025 to 48.1% in Q2 2026, per financial statements, yet TTM net margin sits at 0.9%, indicating that the latest quarter's profitability may not be sustainable.
The dramatic quarterly swings in gross margin—from 10.4% to 48.1%—reflect the impact of purchased oil accounting and commodity price volatility, as reported in the data. While Q2 2026 shows a net margin of 24.2%, the TTM net margin of 0.9% suggests that the quarter's performance is an outlier, possibly due to one-time gains or favorable pricing. Investors should monitor whether the company can sustain margins above the mid-20% range, as the historical average (excluding Q2 2026) is closer to 15%, indicating that the current level may not be the new norm.
Return on Capital Remains Subdued
ROIC averaged 2.0% over the last ten quarters, per reported figures, with Q2 2026 at 4.8%, suggesting that the Enerplus acquisition has yet to generate returns above the cost of capital.
Despite a fortress balance sheet, ROIC has been consistently low, averaging around 2% over the past ten quarters, with the latest quarter at 4.8%. This indicates that the asset base, which expanded 96% post-Enerplus, is not yet generating sufficient returns to cover the cost of capital. The low ROIC is driven by thin net margins and moderate asset turnover, suggesting that the company is still in the integration phase and may need to realize cost synergies to improve capital efficiency. Investors should watch for any improvement in ROIC as a sign that the merger is creating value.
Working Capital Efficiency Deteriorates
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 55 days in Q2 2026 from 85 days a year earlier, as per financial statements, driven by a spike in DSO to 56 days, indicating slower collections.
The cash conversion cycle improved from 85 days in Q2 2025 to 55 days in Q2 2026, but this is primarily due to a sharp reduction in DSO from 100 to 56 days. However, the cycle remains elevated compared to the 2024 average of 84 days, suggesting that working capital management is still not optimal. The increase in DPO to 10 days from 7 days indicates that the company is taking slightly longer to pay suppliers, but the overall cycle is still long, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of the business. Investors should monitor whether the company can sustain the improved DSO or if it reverts to historical levels.
Minimal Leverage Provides Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.18 as of Q2 2026, per balance sheet data, with interest coverage of 18.4x, indicating that the company has ample capacity to service debt even under stress.
With a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18 and interest coverage of 18.4x, Chord Energy's balance sheet is exceptionally conservative, as reported in the latest quarterly figures. This low leverage suggests that the company is well-positioned to withstand commodity price downturns and has the financial flexibility to pursue further acquisitions or increase shareholder returns. However, the low leverage also implies that management is prioritizing stability over growth, which may limit upside potential in a rising price environment. Investors should note that the D/EBITDA ratio of 1.49 is also low, reinforcing the fortress-like balance sheet.
Liquidity Strengthens with Cash Buildup
Current ratio improved to 1.22 in Q2 2026 from 0.97 a year earlier, as per financial statements, with cash at $611.6M, indicating a solid liquidity buffer.
The current ratio has improved from 0.97 in Q2 2025 to 1.22 in Q2 2026, driven by a significant increase in cash to $611.6M, as reported in the balance sheet. This improvement suggests that the company has strengthened its ability to meet short-term obligations, which is crucial given the volatility in commodity prices. However, the quick ratio of 1.15 indicates that the company is not overly reliant on inventory, which is minimal in the E&P sector. The liquidity position appears robust, but investors should monitor whether the cash balance is maintained or deployed for acquisitions or dividends.
Misapplied P/E Ratio Obscures True Value
The trailing P/E of 181.7 is misleading due to depressed TTM earnings, as per valuation data; forward P/E of 7.06 and EV/EBITDA of 5.32 better reflect normalized earnings power.
The trailing P/E of 181.7 is a common misapplication for cyclical E&P companies like Chord Energy, as it is distorted by the trough in TTM earnings. The forward P/E of 7.06 and EV/EBITDA of 5.32 provide a more accurate picture of valuation, suggesting that the market is pricing the stock at a reasonable multiple relative to expected earnings. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and P/FCF (10.93) rather than P/E, as these metrics better capture the cash-generative nature of the business and are less affected by non-cash charges like DD&A. The low P/B of 0.96 also indicates that the stock is trading near book value, which may appeal to value investors.