Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.7x · EV/EBITDA 5.9x · ROE 6.5%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.0B | $13.9B | $13.3B | $12.2B | $19.2B | $38.0B | $36.9B | $32.7B | $19.9B | $32.3B | $25.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $22.5B | $23.1B | $23.1B | $22.9B | $31.1B | $49.9B | $48.2B | $45.5B | $25.3B | $38.8B | $33.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.72 | 14.18 | 24.61 | 24.51 | 28.67 | 39.11 | 31.73 | 27.28 | 10.03 | 25.26 | 22.57 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.99 | 2.16 | 2.06 | 1.87 | 1.20 | 1.82 | 1.52 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 1.24 | 2.72 | 2.99 | 2.47 | 1.54 | 2.98 | 2.34 |
| P/FCF | 6.23 | 8.18 | 7.88 | 6.29 | 13.28 | 23.26 | 11.59 | 22.66 | 9951.05 | 79.35 | 277.52 |
| P/OCF | 4.11 | 5.39 | 5.57 | 4.65 | 8.84 | 15.28 | 8.71 | 12.73 | 9.65 | 14.73 | 12.71 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.18 | 1.20 | 1.18 | 1.60 | 2.83 | 2.70 | 2.60 | 1.53 | 2.18 | 1.95 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.94 | 6.93 | 7.20 | 7.34 | 9.28 | 14.35 | 11.78 | 11.78 | 6.73 | 12.54 | 10.37 |
| EV / EBIT | 10.82 | 12.16 | 15.79 | 15.71 | 19.69 | 25.90 | 20.53 | 19.52 | 11.60 | 16.09 | 13.46 |
| EV / FCF | — | 13.60 | 13.70 | 11.78 | 21.55 | 30.50 | 15.14 | 31.55 | 12667.58 | 95.44 | 357.20 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 25.6% | 24.6% | 25.3% | 25.2% | 27.1% | 31.0% | 30.9% | 31.2% | 33.8% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 9.3% | 7.6% | 7.0% | 7.8% | 10.5% | 12.9% | 13.0% | 18.4% | 13.3% | 14.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.0% | 5.0% | 2.8% | 2.6% | 3.5% | 5.5% | 6.5% | 6.9% | 12.0% | 7.2% | 6.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 3.3% | 4.6% | 7.4% | 9.1% | 9.2% | 16.7% | 11.7% | 11.4% |
| ROA | 3.0% | 3.0% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 4.1% | 7.9% | 5.2% | 4.9% |
| ROIC | 5.6% | 5.6% | 4.3% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 5.6% | 7.0% | 7.7% | 12.8% | 9.9% | 10.6% |
| ROCE | 6.9% | 6.9% | 5.3% | 4.8% | 5.4% | 7.0% | 8.9% | 9.9% | 15.7% | 12.1% | 12.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.43 | 3.87 | 3.94 | 3.83 | 3.03 | 3.58 | 2.01 | 2.43 | 2.53 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 0.67 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.76 | 2.76 | 3.06 | 3.42 | 3.56 | 3.41 | 2.76 | 3.32 | 1.44 | 2.11 | 2.31 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.42 | 5.82 | 5.49 | 8.27 | 7.24 | 3.55 | 8.88 | 2716.53 | 16.09 | 79.68 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.93 | 4.93 | 3.60 | 3.43 | 4.39 | 5.45 | 5.72 | 4.75 | 4.87 | 5.80 | 5.79 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.40 | 1.42 | 1.27 | 1.10 | 1.20 | 1.02 | 1.25 | 1.20 | 1.30 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.03 | 1.07 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.78 | 1.02 | 0.96 | 1.05 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.82 | 6.82 | 7.05 | 6.67 | 6.32 | 6.30 | 6.50 | 7.26 | 7.77 | 9.13 | 8.62 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 58.43 | 64.35 | 68.26 | 69.99 | 74.17 | 66.70 | 75.02 | 75.67 | 71.85 | 79.31 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.5% | 2.9% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2.1% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.6% | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 41.5% | 41.5% | 64.9% | 65.9% | 58.7% | 40.5% | 30.2% | 29.6% | 16.4% | 23.0% | 20.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.5% | 7.1% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 3.5% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 10.0% | 4.0% | 4.4% |
| FCF Yield | 16.0% | 12.2% | 12.7% | 15.9% | 7.5% | 4.3% | 8.6% | 4.4% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.3% | 4.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.8% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.9% | 7.0% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2.1% | 1.0% | 1.9% | 2.9% | 1.8% | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $582M | $587M | $587M | $1.2B | $1.2B | $887M | $887M | $614M | $615M | $613M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FMS stock.
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's current P/E ratio is 11.7x. The historical average is 26.4x. This places it at the 8th percentile of its historical range.
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's current EV/EBITDA is 5.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.4x.
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's return on equity (ROE) is 6.5%. The historical average is 9.1%.
Based on historical data, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA is trading at a P/E of 11.7x. This is at the 8th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's current dividend yield is 3.54% with a payout ratio of 41.5%.
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA has 25.6% gross margin and 9.3% operating margin.
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Labor cost inflation
Margin Compression Persists
Operating margin fell to 9.6% in 2026Q2 from 10.8% in 2025Q4, per financial statements, while gross margin improved to 27.0%, indicating that cost pressures are concentrated in operating expenses.
The divergence between gross margin expansion and operating margin contraction suggests that FMS is capturing some pricing or mix benefits at the product level, but these are being more than offset by rising SG&A and labor costs. Net margin of 4.5% in 2026Q2 remains thin, reflecting the high fixed-cost structure and reimbursement constraints. The trend of operating margin hovering in the 8-10% range over the past two years indicates that the company has not yet regained the operating leverage it lost during the pandemic labor shock.
Returns Trapped at Low Levels
ROIC has remained below 2% for eight consecutive quarters, reaching 1.5% in 2026Q2, per reported figures, while ROE sits at 6.5% TTM, suggesting capital efficiency is structurally impaired.
The persistently low ROIC, despite a stable asset turnover of 0.15x, indicates that the business is generating insufficient operating income relative to its invested capital base. The heavy goodwill load of $14.0B, representing 45% of total assets, inflates the capital base without contributing to operating earnings, dragging down returns. Even with modest deleveraging, the return on capital remains below the cost of capital, which may justify the market's deep value discount.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 104 days in 2026Q2 from 91 days in 2025Q4, per financial statements, driven by a DSO increase to 67 days and DPO of only 23 days.
The elongation of the cash conversion cycle suggests that FMS is taking longer to collect from payers, likely reflecting administrative friction in U.S. healthcare billing, while paying suppliers relatively quickly. The DSO of 67 days is elevated compared to the 58 days seen in 2025Q4, indicating a potential deterioration in receivables quality or payer mix shift. This working capital drag consumes cash and may explain the volatility in free cash flow, which swung from $620M in 2025Q2 to $37M in 2026Q1.
Leverage Creeps Higher on Equity Erosion
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.81 in 2026Q2 from 0.70 in 2025Q1, per balance sheet data, as equity fell $1.8B while debt stayed near $11B, despite D/EBITDA of 13.3x.
The increase in leverage is not driven by new borrowing but by a shrinking equity base, which has been eroded by buybacks and cumulative losses. The D/EBITDA of 13.3x is extremely high, though this metric may be distorted by depressed EBITDA; interest coverage of 4.78x in 2026Q2 remains adequate but has weakened from 6.14x in 2025Q4. The reported D/E of 0.76% in the snapshot appears to be a data error, as the quarterly data consistently shows D/E around 0.8, which is more consistent with historical norms.
Liquidity Buffer Thins
Current ratio fell to 1.07 in 2026Q2 from 1.50 in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, with quick ratio at 0.75, indicating a tighter short-term position.
The declining current ratio suggests that FMS's ability to cover short-term obligations with short-term assets is weakening, though the absolute level remains above 1.0. The quick ratio of 0.75 indicates that inventory is a significant component of current assets, which may be less liquid in a stress scenario. Given the high fixed-cost structure and reliance on steady dialysis volumes, a sudden disruption in cash collections could strain liquidity, but the stable cash flow generation provides some cushion.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA of 6.15x appears optically cheap, but EBITDA is depressed by labor inflation and excludes significant non-controlling interests, per reported figures, making the multiple misleading.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly used to compare FMS with peers like DaVita, but it fails to capture the substantial non-controlling interests in its clinic joint ventures, which reduce the cash flows available to shareholders. Additionally, EBITDA does not reflect the high maintenance capex required to keep dialysis equipment and clinics operational, nor does it account for the working capital swings that have caused FCF volatility. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/operating cash flow, which better captures the true earnings power and cash generation of the business.