Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AVGO | 23.9% revenue growth vs ASML's 11.0% |
| Value | ASML | PEG 1.68 vs 2.23 |
| Quality / Margins | AVGO | 36.2% net margin vs ASML's 29.4% |
| Stability / Safety | ASML | Beta 1.45 vs AVGO's 1.75, lower leverage |
| Dividends | AVGO | 0.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ASML's 0.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ASML | +105.6% vs AVGO's +61.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ASML | 18.3% ROA vs AVGO's 13.5%, ROIC 80.9% vs 14.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
ASML is the world's only manufacturer of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines — the most advanced equipment needed to produce cutting-edge semiconductors. It generates revenue primarily from selling these multi-million-dollar systems (over 80% of sales) and related services like maintenance and upgrades. Its monopoly on EUV technology — which took decades and billions to develop — creates an insurmountable moat, as no competitor can realistically replicate its complex ecosystem.
Broadcom is a semiconductor and infrastructure software company that designs and supplies critical components for data centers, networking, and connectivity. It generates revenue primarily from semiconductor sales (~70%) and infrastructure software licensing (~30%), with key segments including wired infrastructure, wireless communications, and enterprise storage. The company's moat lies in its deep engineering expertise, extensive patent portfolio, and entrenched positions in mission-critical infrastructure where customers face high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AVGO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). ASML leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.9B annually — 2.0x ASML's $31.4B. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASML's 29.4%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +22.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ASMLASML Holding N.V. | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $31.4B | $63.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11.8B | $34.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.2B | $23.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10.7B | $26.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.8% | +67.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.6% | +39.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +36.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +42.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.0% | +22.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 51.8x trailing earnings, ASML trades at a 23% valuation discount to AVGO's 67.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ASML offers better value at 2.10x vs AVGO's 4.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ASMLASML Holding N.V. | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $563.0B | $1.52T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $551.0B | $1.56T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.82x | 66.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.31x | 31.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.10x | 4.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 39.45x | 44.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.21x | 23.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 24.40x | 19.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.83x | 56.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASML delivers a 47.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $28 for AVGO. ASML carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASML scores 8/9 vs AVGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ASMLASML Holding N.V. | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +47.1% | +28.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.3% | +13.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +80.9% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +39.6% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10.2B | $49.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12.9B | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $65.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 8.09x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $67,244 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25,413 for ASML. Over the past 12 months, ASML leads with a +105.6% total return vs AVGO's +61.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 76.4% vs ASML's 33.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ASMLASML Holding N.V. | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.8% | -8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +105.6% | +61.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.1% | +448.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +154.1% | +572.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1540.9% | +2389.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | +76.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ASML is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVGO's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASML currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs AVGO's 77.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ASMLASML Holding N.V. | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1547.22 | $414.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $578.51 | $138.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 21.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASML as "Buy" and AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.9% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs 0.5% for ASML (target: $1459). For income investors, AVGO offers the higher dividend yield at 0.72% vs ASML's 0.51%.
| Metric | ASMLASML Holding N.V. | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1458.50 | $443.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 57 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.30 | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) | 100 | 501.37 | +401.4% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 1,161.79 | +1061.8% |
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) returned +572% over 5 years vs ASML Holding N.V. (ASML)'s +154%. A $10,000 investment in AVGO 5 years ago would be worth $67,244 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) | $6.9B | $31.4B | +356.4% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | $13.2B | $63.9B | +382.5% |
ASML Holding N.V.'s revenue grew from $6.9B (2016) to $31.4B (2025) — a 18.4% CAGR. Broadcom Inc.'s revenue grew from $13.2B (2016) to $63.9B (2025) — a 19.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) | 22.7% | 29.4% | +29.8% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | -13.1% | 36.2% | +375.6% |
ASML Holding N.V.'s net margin went from 23% (2016) to 29% (2025). Broadcom Inc.'s net margin went from -13% (2016) to 36% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) | 37.7 | 45.1 | +19.6% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 61.2 | 72.6 | +18.6% |
ASML Holding N.V. has traded in a 25x–62x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~52x. Broadcom Inc. has traded in a 9x–189x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~67x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) | 3.63 | 23.73 | +553.7% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | -0.44 | 4.77 | +1184.1% |
ASML Holding N.V.'s EPS grew from $3.63 (2016) to $23.73 (2025) — a 23% CAGR. Broadcom Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.44 (2016) to $4.77 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
ASML Holding N.V. generated $11B FCF in 2025 (+3% vs 2021). Broadcom Inc. generated $27B FCF in 2025 (+102% vs 2021).
ASML vs AVGO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASML or AVGO a better buy right now?
ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) offers the better valuation at 51.8x trailing P/E (41.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASML or AVGO?
On trailing P/E, ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is the cheapest at 51.8x versus Broadcom Inc. at 67.0x. On forward P/E, Broadcom Inc. is actually cheaper at 31.1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ASML Holding N.V. wins at 1.68x versus Broadcom Inc.'s 2.23x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASML or AVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) delivered a total return of +572.4%, compared to +154.1% for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth approximately $67K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +23.9% versus ASML's +1541%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASML or AVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is the lower-risk stock at 1.45β versus Broadcom Inc.'s 1.75β — meaning AVGO is approximately 21% more volatile than ASML relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — ASML or AVGO?
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36.2% net margin versus 29.4% for ASML Holding N.V. — meaning it keeps 36.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39.9% versus 34.6% for ASML. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ASML or AVGO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1.68x versus Broadcom Inc.'s 2.23x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) trades at 31.1x forward P/E versus 41.3x for ASML Holding N.V. — 10.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 38.9% to $443.72.
07Which pays a better dividend — ASML or AVGO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) offers the highest yield at 0.7%, versus 0.5% for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML).
08Is ASML or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.5% yield, +1541% 10Y return). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1.75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASML: +1541%, AVGO: +23.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ASML and AVGO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.