Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NFLX | 15.9% revenue growth vs BATRA's 10.5% |
| Quality / Margins | NFLX | 24.3% net margin vs BATRA's -3.2% |
| Stability / Safety | BATRA | Beta 0.48 vs NFLX's 0.76 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BATRA | +9.7% vs NFLX's -1.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NFLX | 19.8% ROA vs BATRA's -1.4%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Atlanta Braves Holdings is a professional sports franchise that owns and operates the Atlanta Braves Major League Baseball team and its surrounding real estate development. The company generates revenue primarily from baseball operations — including ticket sales, media rights, and sponsorships — and from The Battery Atlanta mixed-use development, which includes retail, dining, and entertainment venues. Its key competitive advantage is the unique combination of a historic MLB franchise with a successful real estate ecosystem that creates multiple revenue streams beyond traditional sports operations.
Netflix is a global streaming entertainment service that offers original and licensed TV shows, movies, and documentaries. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees — with three pricing tiers — and earns additional income from licensing its original content to other platforms. Its key advantage is its massive scale and data-driven content creation, which allows it to invest billions in programming that attracts and retains subscribers worldwide.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BATRA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 61.7x BATRA's $732M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BATRA's -3.2%.
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $732M | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $92M | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$120M | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -109.7% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NFLX's 13.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BATRA's 35.1x.
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $407.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $413.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -130.84x | 38.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.07x | 13.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.43x | 9.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.74x | 15.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BATRA. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BATRA's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs BATRA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $726M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $112M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $837M | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.95x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,479 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,198 for BATRA. Over the past 12 months, BATRA leads with a +9.7% total return vs NFLX's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 44.0% vs BATRA's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.7% | +5.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.7% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.3% | +198.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.0% | +74.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +143.9% | +930.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.2% | +44.0% |
Risk & Volatility
BATRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFLX's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BATRA currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.50 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.67 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.4 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 38.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BATRA as "Buy" and NFLX as "Buy".
| Metric | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $117.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | 100 | 168.3 | +68.3% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 217.16 | +117.2% |
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) returned +75% over 5 years vs Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA)'s +62%. A $10,000 investment in NFLX 5 years ago would be worth $17,479 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | $262M | $732M | +179.6% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | $8.8B | $45.2B | +411.7% |
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $262M (2016) to $732M (2025) — a 12.1% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s revenue grew from $8.8B (2016) to $45.2B (2025) — a 19.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | -23.7% | -3.2% | +86.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 2.1% | 24.3% | +1049.7% |
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from -24% (2016) to -3% (2025). Netflix, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to 24% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 153.6 | 37.1 | -75.8% |
Netflix, Inc. has traded in a 30x–154x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~38x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | -1.25 | -0.37 | +70.4% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 0.04 | 2.53 | +5783.7% |
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.25 (2016) to $-0.37 (2025). Netflix, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.04 (2016) to $2.53 (2025) — a 57% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. generated $-120M FCF in 2025 (-544% vs 2021). Netflix, Inc. generated $9B FCF in 2025 (+7269% vs 2021).
BATRA vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BATRA or NFLX a better buy right now?
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 38.0x trailing P/E (30.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BATRA or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) delivered a total return of +74.8%, compared to +62.0% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA). A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +930.4% versus BATRA's +143.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BATRA or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.48β versus Netflix, Inc.'s 0.76β — meaning NFLX is approximately 57% more volatile than BATRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 156% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — BATRA or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24.3% net margin versus -3.2% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29.5% versus 2.3% for BATRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — BATRA or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is BATRA or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.76), +930.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +930.4%, BATRA: +143.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between BATRA and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.