Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) vs Shell plc (SHEL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SHEL | -5.9% revenue growth vs CVE's -14.0% |
| Value | SHEL | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 15.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | SHEL | 6.7% net margin vs CVE's 5.7% |
| Stability / Safety | SHEL | Beta 0.64 vs CVE's 1.13 |
| Dividends | SHEL | 3.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CVE's 2.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CVE | +65.2% vs SHEL's +28.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CVE | 5.9% ROA vs SHEL's 4.8%, ROIC 7.9% vs 9.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Cenovus Energy is an integrated Canadian oil and gas company that develops and produces crude oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas. It makes money primarily through oil sands production (~60% of upstream volumes) and conventional oil/gas operations, supplemented by refining and marketing through its manufacturing and retail segments. The company's key advantage is its integrated model—combining upstream production with downstream refining capacity—which provides operational flexibility and margin stability across the energy value chain.
Shell is a global integrated energy company that explores for, produces, refines, and markets oil, natural gas, and petrochemical products. It generates revenue primarily through its upstream oil and gas production (~40% of earnings), integrated gas and LNG operations (~30%), and downstream marketing and chemicals businesses (~30%). The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, integrated value chain—from production to retail—and leading positions in liquefied natural gas and deepwater exploration.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SHEL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). CVE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
SHEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $267.5B annually — 4.8x CVE's $55.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.7% (SHEL) to 5.7% (CVE). On growth, SHEL holds the edge at -1.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CVECenovus Energy In… | SHELShell plc |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $55.5B | $267.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.8B | $53.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.1B | $17.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.8B | $22.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +16.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +8.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | -1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.4% | +3.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, SHEL trades at a 2% valuation discount to CVE's 14.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHEL's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVE's 7.3x.
| Metric | CVECenovus Energy In… | SHELShell plc |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42.1B | $235.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52.5B | $310.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.20x | 13.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.03x | 13.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.32x | 5.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 0.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.91x | 10.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVE delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for SHEL. CVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEL's 0.60x.
| Metric | CVECenovus Energy In… | SHELShell plc |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +10.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14.3B | $74.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.7B | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.0B | $104.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.64x | 6.98x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CVE five years ago would be worth $32,664 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,319 for SHEL. Over the past 12 months, CVE leads with a +65.2% total return vs SHEL's +28.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHEL at 14.7% vs CVE's 9.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CVECenovus Energy In… | SHELShell plc |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.3% | +11.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.2% | +28.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.3% | +51.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +226.6% | +133.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.6% | +146.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.0% | +14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SHEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVE's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEL currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CVE's 95.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CVECenovus Energy In… | SHELShell plc |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.39 | $83.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.23 | $58.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 60.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.7M | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CVE as "Hold" and SHEL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.0% upside for CVE (target: $28) vs 2.6% for SHEL (target: $86). For income investors, SHEL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.42% vs CVE's 2.56%.
| Metric | CVECenovus Energy In… | SHELShell plc |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.67 | $85.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $2.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +6.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) | 100 | 260.86 | +160.9% |
| Shell plc (SHEL) | 100 | 168.93 | +68.9% |
Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) returned +227% over 5 years vs Shell plc (SHEL)'s +133%. A $10,000 investment in CVE 5 years ago would be worth $32,664 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) | $11.0B | $49.7B | +350.8% |
| Shell plc (SHEL) | $233.6B | $267.5B | +14.5% |
Cenovus Energy Inc.'s revenue grew from $11.0B (2016) to $49.7B (2025) — a 18.2% CAGR. Shell plc's revenue grew from $233.6B (2016) to $267.5B (2025) — a 1.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) | -4.9% | 7.9% | +259.8% |
| Shell plc (SHEL) | 2.0% | 6.7% | +241.3% |
Cenovus Energy Inc.'s net margin went from -5% (2016) to 8% (2025). Shell plc's net margin went from 2% (2016) to 7% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) | 3 | 7.9 | +163.3% |
| Shell plc (SHEL) | 21.4 | 12.2 | -43.0% |
Cenovus Energy Inc. has traded in a 3x–42x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. Shell plc has traded in a 5x–21x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) | -0.65 | 2.15 | +430.8% |
| Shell plc (SHEL) | 1.16 | 6.02 | +419.0% |
Cenovus Energy Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.65 (2016) to $2.15 (2025). Shell plc's EPS grew from $1.16 (2016) to $6.02 (2025) — a 20% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Cenovus Energy Inc. generated $3B FCF in 2025 (+1% vs 2021). Shell plc generated $22B FCF in 2025 (-16% vs 2021).
CVE vs SHEL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVE or SHEL a better buy right now?
Shell plc (SHEL) offers the better valuation at 13.9x trailing P/E (13.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shell plc (SHEL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVE or SHEL?
On trailing P/E, Shell plc (SHEL) is the cheapest at 13.9x versus Cenovus Energy Inc. at 14.2x. On forward P/E, Shell plc is actually cheaper at 13.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVE or SHEL?
Over the past 5 years, Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) delivered a total return of +226.6%, compared to +133.2% for Shell plc (SHEL). A $10,000 investment in CVE five years ago would be worth approximately $33K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHEL returned +146.2% versus CVE's +118.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVE or SHEL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shell plc (SHEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.64β versus Cenovus Energy Inc.'s 1.13β — meaning CVE is approximately 77% more volatile than SHEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 60% for Shell plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CVE or SHEL?
Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) is the more profitable company, earning 7.9% net margin versus 6.7% for Shell plc — meaning it keeps 7.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHEL leads at 11.5% versus 8.8% for CVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHEL leads at 16.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CVE or SHEL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Shell plc (SHEL) trades at 13.4x forward P/E versus 15.0x for Cenovus Energy Inc. — 1.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVE: 24.0% to $27.67.
07Which pays a better dividend — CVE or SHEL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Shell plc (SHEL) offers the highest yield at 3.4%, versus 2.6% for Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE).
08Is CVE or SHEL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shell plc (SHEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.64), 3.4% yield, +146.2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEL: +146.2%, CVE: +118.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CVE and SHEL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.