GOOS
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$550M
5Y Perf.-38.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GOOS vs RL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$48.53B
5Y Perf.+374.7%
GOOS vs RL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GOOS | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $550M | $48.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.46B | $7.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $919M |
| Gross Margin | 70.2% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 15.0% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $743M | $2.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $334M | $1.92B |
GOOS vs RL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GOOS
RL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canada Goose Holdin… (GOOS) | 100 | 61.1 | -38.9% |
| Ralph Lauren Corpor… (RL) | 100 | 474.7 | +374.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOOS vs RL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Canada Goose Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GOOS
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
GOOS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.35
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth 70.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, current ratio 2.67x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
RL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 324.6% 10Y total return vs GOOS's -25.9%
- 6.7% revenue growth vs GOOS's 1.1%
- 11.7% margin vs GOOS's 1.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RL | 6.7% revenue growth vs GOOS's 1.1% |
| Value | GOOS | Lower P/E (14.9x vs 22.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | RL | 11.7% margin vs GOOS's 1.5% |
| Stability / Safety | GOOS | Beta 1.35 vs RL's 1.53 |