Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ORCL | 8.4% revenue growth vs MLGO's -9.2% |
| Value | MLGO | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 19.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | ORCL | 25.3% net margin vs MLGO's 11.1% |
| Stability / Safety | MLGO | Beta 0.16 vs ORCL's 1.40, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ORCL | 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; MLGO pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ORCL | -11.2% vs MLGO's -97.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ORCL | 7.5% ROA vs MLGO's 2.1%, ROIC 12.8% vs 14.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
MicroAlgo develops central processing algorithm solutions that optimize computing performance for clients in internet advertising, gaming, and intelligent chips. It generates revenue primarily through algorithm services — including optimization, data processing, and intelligence services — and secondarily through intelligent chip resale and software development. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary algorithms that accelerate computing power without requiring hardware upgrades, offering cost-effective performance enhancements.
Oracle is a global enterprise software and cloud computing company that provides database management systems, enterprise applications, and cloud infrastructure services. It generates revenue primarily through cloud services and license support (~70% of total revenue) and cloud license and on-premise license sales (~20%), with hardware and services making up the remainder. The company's key moat is its entrenched position in enterprise database software—particularly with its flagship Oracle Database—which creates significant switching costs and lock-in for large corporate customers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). MLGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.0B annually — 997.5x MLGO's $61M. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MLGO's 11.1%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MLGOMicroAlgo Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $61.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $22.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $15.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | -$13.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +70.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +30.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +25.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | -21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.3% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, MLGO trades at a 81% valuation discount to ORCL's 33.5x P/E.
| Metric | MLGOMicroAlgo Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $408.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$85M | $501.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.49x | 33.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -30.45x | 21.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 7.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 19.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.77x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 50.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $2 for MLGO. MLGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ORCL scores 6/9 vs MLGO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MLGOMicroAlgo Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +50.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.1% | +12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +14.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 4.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$121M | $93.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $144M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $104.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 25.26x | 3.24x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $23,146 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for MLGO. Over the past 12 months, ORCL leads with a -11.2% total return vs MLGO's -97.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORCL at 19.9% vs MLGO's -93.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MLGOMicroAlgo Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.3% | -25.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.1% | -11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +72.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +131.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +327.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.3% | +19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MLGO is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ORCL currently trades 42.1% from its 52-week high vs MLGO's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MLGOMicroAlgo Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.16x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $972.00 | $345.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.35 | $118.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.4% | +42.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 149K | 20.9M |
Analyst Outlook
ORCL is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MLGOMicroAlgo Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $295.85 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 86 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) | 100 | 0.01 | -100.0% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 206.98 | +107.0% |
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) returned +131% over 5 years vs MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO)'s -100%. A $10,000 investment in ORCL 5 years ago would be worth $23,146 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) | $16M | $74M | +364.6% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | $37.0B | $57.4B | +54.9% |
Oracle Corporation's revenue grew from $37.0B (2016) to $57.4B (2025) — a 5.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) | 39.0% | 7.1% | -81.7% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 24.0% | 21.7% | -9.8% |
Oracle Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2016) to 22% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 21.4 | 44.9 | +109.8% |
Oracle Corporation has traded in a 18x–53x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~34x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) | 29.45 | 0.55 | -98.1% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 2.07 | 4.34 | +109.7% |
Oracle Corporation's EPS grew from $2.07 (2016) to $4.34 (2025) — a 9% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
MicroAlgo Inc. generated $4M FCF in 2024 (-74% vs 2021). Oracle Corporation generated $-394M FCF in 2025 (-103% vs 2021).
MLGO vs ORCL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLGO or ORCL a better buy right now?
MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) offers the better valuation at 6.5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oracle Corporation (ORCL) a "Buy" — based on 86 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLGO or ORCL?
On trailing P/E, MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) is the cheapest at 6.5x versus Oracle Corporation at 33.5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLGO or ORCL?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +131.5%, compared to -100.0% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth approximately $23K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +327.4% versus MLGO's -100.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLGO or ORCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.16β versus Oracle Corporation's 1.40β — meaning ORCL is approximately 790% more volatile than MLGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MLGO or ORCL?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.7% net margin versus 7.1% for MicroAlgo Inc. — meaning it keeps 21.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30.8% versus 3.7% for MLGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORCL leads at 70.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MLGO or ORCL?
In this comparison, ORCL (1.1% yield) pays a dividend. MLGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MLGO or ORCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.16)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLGO: -100.0%, ORCL: +327.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MLGO and ORCL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: MLGO is a small-cap deep-value stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ORCL pays a dividend while MLGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.