Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MNST | 10.7% revenue growth vs CCEP's -1.8% |
| Value | CCEP | Lower P/E (21.0x vs 37.5x), PEG 0.69 vs 4.69 |
| Quality / Margins | MNST | 23.0% net margin vs CCEP's 8.1% |
| Stability / Safety | CCEP | Beta 0.16 vs MNST's 0.30 |
| Dividends | CCEP | 2.1% yield; MNST pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MNST | +56.1% vs CCEP's +30.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNST | 19.1% ROA vs CCEP's 11.2%, ROIC 33.1% vs 10.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Monster Beverage is a leading energy drink company that develops, markets, and sells a wide range of energy beverages globally. It generates revenue primarily through its Monster Energy Drinks segment — which accounts for the vast majority of sales — along with its Strategic Brands portfolio and other beverage offerings. The company's moat lies in its powerful Monster Energy brand, extensive distribution network, and strong relationships with bottlers and retailers that create significant barriers to entry.
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners is a major Coca-Cola bottling partner that produces, distributes, and sells non-alcoholic beverages across Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. It generates revenue primarily through beverage sales — including sparkling drinks (~60%), still beverages (~30%), and energy drinks (~10%) — with most coming from its core Coca-Cola brand portfolio. Its key advantage is exclusive long-term bottling rights for Coca-Cola products in its territories, combined with extensive distribution networks and local market expertise.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CCEP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MNST leads in 2 (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CCEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.3B annually — 5.0x MNST's $8.3B. MNST is the more profitable business, keeping 23.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCEP's 8.1%. On growth, MNST holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MNSTMonster Beverage … | CCEPCoca-Cola Europac… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.3B | $41.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.5B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +10.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | -0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.3% | +69.4% |
Valuation Metrics
At 22.9x trailing earnings, CCEP trades at a 48% valuation discount to MNST's 44.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCEP offers better value at 0.76x vs MNST's 5.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | MNSTMonster Beverage … | CCEPCoca-Cola Europac… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $83.4B | $49.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $81.3B | $61.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.97x | 22.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.51x | 21.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.49x | 0.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 33.62x | 15.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.06x | 2.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.11x | 5.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCEP delivers a 40.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $23 for MNST. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCEP scores 6/9 vs MNST's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MNSTMonster Beverage … | CCEPCoca-Cola Europac… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.1% | +40.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.1% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +33.1% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +31.9% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.1B | $10.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $918M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $11.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 299.84x | 9.78x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CCEP five years ago would be worth $22,866 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,484 for MNST. Over the past 12 months, MNST leads with a +56.1% total return vs CCEP's +30.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCEP at 28.6% vs MNST's 18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MNSTMonster Beverage … | CCEPCoca-Cola Europac… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +25.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.1% | +30.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.6% | +112.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.8% | +128.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +307.7% | +189.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | +28.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CCEP is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNST's 0.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | MNSTMonster Beverage … | CCEPCoca-Cola Europac… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.36 | $110.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.90 | $80.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.4 | 88.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MNST as "Buy" and CCEP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.3% upside for CCEP (target: $113) vs -1.6% for MNST (target: $84). CCEP is the only dividend payer here at 2.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MNSTMonster Beverage … | CCEPCoca-Cola Europac… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $83.92 | $113.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | 100 | 250.46 | +150.5% |
| Coca-Cola Europacif… (CCEP) | 100 | 172.56 | +72.6% |
Coca-Cola Europacif… (CCEP) returned +129% over 5 years vs Monster Beverage Co… (MNST)'s +95%. A $10,000 investment in CCEP 5 years ago would be worth $22,866 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | $3.0B | $8.3B | +172.0% |
| Coca-Cola Europacif… (CCEP) | $9.6B | $20.1B | +109.6% |
Monster Beverage Corporation's revenue grew from $3.0B (2016) to $8.3B (2025) — a 11.8% CAGR. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's revenue grew from $9.6B (2016) to $20.1B (2025) — a 8.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | 23.4% | 23.0% | -1.7% |
| Coca-Cola Europacif… (CCEP) | 6.0% | 9.3% | +54.6% |
Monster Beverage Corporation's net margin went from 23% (2016) to 23% (2025). Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's net margin went from 6% (2016) to 9% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | 44.6 | 39.5 | -11.4% |
| Coca-Cola Europacif… (CCEP) | 30.2 | 22.2 | -26.5% |
Monster Beverage Corporation has traded in a 28x–45x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~44x. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has traded in a 17x–46x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~23x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monster Beverage Co… (MNST) | 0.6 | 1.94 | +223.3% |
| Coca-Cola Europacif… (CCEP) | 1.5 | 4.09 | +172.7% |
Monster Beverage Corporation's EPS grew from $0.60 (2016) to $1.94 (2025) — a 14% CAGR. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's EPS grew from $1.50 (2016) to $4.09 (2025) — a 12% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Monster Beverage Corporation generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021). Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+10% vs 2021).
MNST vs CCEP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MNST or CCEP a better buy right now?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) offers the better valuation at 22.9x trailing P/E (21.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MNST or CCEP?
On trailing P/E, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is the cheapest at 22.9x versus Monster Beverage Corporation at 44.0x. On forward P/E, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC is actually cheaper at 21.0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC wins at 0.69x versus Monster Beverage Corporation's 4.69x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MNST or CCEP?
Over the past 5 years, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) delivered a total return of +128.7%, compared to +94.8% for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). A $10,000 investment in CCEP five years ago would be worth approximately $23K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNST returned +307.7% versus CCEP's +189.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MNST or CCEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.16β versus Monster Beverage Corporation's 0.30β — meaning MNST is approximately 90% more volatile than CCEP relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — MNST or CCEP?
Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is the more profitable company, earning 23.0% net margin versus 9.3% for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC — meaning it keeps 23.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNST leads at 29.2% versus 12.9% for CCEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNST leads at 55.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MNST or CCEP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.69x versus Monster Beverage Corporation's 4.69x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) trades at 21.0x forward P/E versus 37.5x for Monster Beverage Corporation — 16.5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCEP: 2.3% to $113.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — MNST or CCEP?
In this comparison, CCEP (2.1% yield) pays a dividend. MNST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MNST or CCEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.16), 2.1% yield, +189.0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCEP: +189.0%, MNST: +307.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MNST and CCEP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. CCEP pays a dividend while MNST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.