Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Nano Labs Ltd (NA) vs Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AVGO | 23.9% revenue growth vs NA's -48.2% |
| Quality / Margins | AVGO | 36.2% net margin vs NA's -261.0% |
| Stability / Safety | NA | Beta 0.67 vs AVGO's 1.75 |
| Dividends | AVGO | 0.7% yield; 15-year raise streak; NA pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AVGO | +61.4% vs NA's -53.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AVGO | 13.5% ROA vs NA's -4.3%, ROIC 14.9% vs -30.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Nano Labs is a fabless semiconductor company that designs high-performance computing chips for data centers and distributed computing applications. It generates revenue primarily from chip sales to enterprise customers — including high throughput computing chips, smart network interface cards, and vision computing chips — with additional income from software and technology licensing. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized expertise in high-performance computing architectures and its early-mover position in China's growing data center chip market.
Broadcom is a semiconductor and infrastructure software company that designs and supplies critical components for data centers, networking, and connectivity. It generates revenue primarily from semiconductor sales (~70%) and infrastructure software licensing (~30%), with key segments including wired infrastructure, wireless communications, and enterprise storage. The company's moat lies in its deep engineering expertise, extensive patent portfolio, and entrenched positions in mission-critical infrastructure where customers face high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AVGO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.9B annually — 2646.5x NA's $24M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NA's -2.6%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +22.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $63.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$66M | $34.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $23.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$117M | $26.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +67.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +39.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +36.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +42.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.5% | +22.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $1.52T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $1.56T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.12x | 66.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 44.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 23.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.88x | 19.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 56.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVGO delivers a 28.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NA. AVGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NA's 0.85x.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.2% | +28.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.3% | +13.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.4% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.3% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $166M | $49.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $199M | $65.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.56x | 8.09x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $67,244 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $245 for NA. Over the past 12 months, AVGO leads with a +61.4% total return vs NA's -53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 76.4% vs NA's -36.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | -8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.2% | +61.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.3% | +448.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +572.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +2389.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.5% | +76.4% |
Risk & Volatility
NA is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVGO's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVGO currently trades 77.1% from its 52-week high vs NA's 9.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.48 | $414.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.75 | $138.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.4% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 21.0M |
Analyst Outlook
AVGO is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | AVGOBroadcom Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $443.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 57 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jul 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | 100 | 2.71 | -97.3% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 617.28 | +517.3% |
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) returned +572% over 5 years vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)'s -98%. A $10,000 investment in AVGO 5 years ago would be worth $67,244 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | $0.00 | $41M | — |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | $13.2B | $63.9B | +382.5% |
Broadcom Inc.'s revenue grew from $13.2B (2016) to $63.9B (2025) — a 19.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | -17.7% | -2.8% | +84.3% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | -13.1% | 36.2% | +375.6% |
Broadcom Inc.'s net margin went from -13% (2016) to 36% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 61.2 | 72.6 | +18.6% |
Broadcom Inc. has traded in a 9x–189x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~67x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | -0.28 | -1.67 | -496.4% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | -0.44 | 4.77 | +1184.1% |
Broadcom Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.44 (2016) to $4.77 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Nano Labs Ltd generated $-176M FCF in 2024 (-379% vs 2021). Broadcom Inc. generated $27B FCF in 2025 (+102% vs 2021).
NA vs AVGO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NA or AVGO a better buy right now?
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) offers the better valuation at 67.0x trailing P/E (31.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) a "Buy" — based on 57 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NA or AVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) delivered a total return of +572.4%, compared to -97.6% for Nano Labs Ltd (NA). A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth approximately $67K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +23.9% versus NA's -97.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NA or AVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nano Labs Ltd (NA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.67β versus Broadcom Inc.'s 1.75β — meaning AVGO is approximately 162% more volatile than NA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 85% for Nano Labs Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — NA or AVGO?
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36.2% net margin versus -278.8% for Nano Labs Ltd — meaning it keeps 36.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39.9% versus -242.7% for NA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — NA or AVGO?
In this comparison, AVGO (0.7% yield) pays a dividend. NA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is NA or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nano Labs Ltd (NA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.67)). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1.75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NA: -97.6%, AVGO: +23.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between NA and AVGO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. AVGO pays a dividend while NA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.