Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not (SCCF) vs Public Storage (PSA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SCCF | 91.9% revenue growth vs PSA's 2.7% |
| Value | PSA | Lower P/E (30.5x vs 391.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | PSA | 39.5% net margin vs SCCF's -328.5% |
| Stability / Safety | SCCF | Beta 0.04 vs PSA's 0.45 |
| Dividends | SCCF | 1.5% yield; PSA pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SCCF | +27.7% vs PSA's +5.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PSA | 9.4% ROA vs SCCF's -6.7%, ROIC 13.5% vs -2.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Sachem Capital is a mortgage real estate investment trust that provides short-term, first mortgage loans to real estate investors for property acquisition and development. It generates revenue primarily from interest income on its loan portfolio — roughly 90% of total revenue — with additional income from loan origination fees and servicing. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on the underserved short-term lending market for residential and commercial property investors, where it has developed deep underwriting expertise.
Public Storage is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates self-storage facilities across the United States and Europe. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from storage units — with additional income from tenant insurance, truck rentals, and property management services — making it one of the largest self-storage operators globally. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, prime locations, and strong brand recognition that creates pricing power and operational efficiency.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PSA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SCCF leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 486.1x SCCF's $10M. PSA is the more profitable business, keeping 39.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SCCF's -3.3%. On growth, SCCF holds the edge at +82.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +73.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -194.3% | +53.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +39.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +65.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.6% | +3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.1% | +21.3% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $53.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $63.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.27x | 34.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 391.67x | 30.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.49x | 11.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.13x | 5.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 87.47x | 16.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSA delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SCCF. PSA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCF's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSA scores 5/9 vs SCCF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.4% | +20.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.7% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | +17.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $283M | $9.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $318M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $301M | $10.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.19x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in PSA five years ago would be worth $16,046 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,161 for SCCF. Over the past 12 months, SCCF leads with a +27.7% total return vs PSA's +5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCF at 9.4% vs PSA's 4.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | +5.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.1% | +14.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +60.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +64.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SCCF is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSA's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCF currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs PSA's 95.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.69 | $322.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.94 | $256.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 959K |
Analyst Outlook
SCCF is the only dividend payer here at 1.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PSAPublic Storage |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $301.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | May 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | 100 | 94.77 | -5.2% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 100 | 82.21 | -17.8% |
Public Storage (PSA) returned +60% over 5 years vs Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF)'s +22%. A $10,000 investment in PSA 5 years ago would be worth $16,046 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | $4M | $58M | +1291.1% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | $2.6B | $4.8B | +88.4% |
Public Storage's revenue grew from $2.6B (2016) to $4.8B (2025) — a 7.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | 73.8% | -68.8% | -193.2% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 56.8% | 37.3% | -34.4% |
Public Storage's net margin went from 57% (2016) to 37% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Storage (PSA) | 31.1 | 28.8 | -7.4% |
Public Storage has traded in a 12x–38x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~34x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | 0.27 | -0.93 | -438.4% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 6.81 | 9.01 | +32.3% |
Public Storage's EPS grew from $6.81 (2016) to $9.01 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not generated $13M FCF in 2024 (-46% vs 2021). Public Storage generated $3B FCF in 2025 (+40% vs 2021).
SCCF vs PSA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCF or PSA a better buy right now?
Public Storage (PSA) offers the better valuation at 34.1x trailing P/E (30.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Public Storage (PSA) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCF or PSA?
On forward P/E, Public Storage is actually cheaper at 30.5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCF or PSA?
Over the past 5 years, Public Storage (PSA) delivered a total return of +60.5%, compared to +21.6% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not (SCCF). A $10,000 investment in PSA five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PSA returned +64.9% versus SCCF's +21.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCF or PSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not (SCCF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.04β versus Public Storage's 0.45β — meaning PSA is approximately 1033% more volatile than SCCF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Public Storage (PSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 110% versus 166% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — SCCF or PSA?
Public Storage (PSA) is the more profitable company, earning 37.3% net margin versus -68.8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not — meaning it keeps 37.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSA leads at 70.6% versus -30.9% for SCCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCF leads at 100.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SCCF or PSA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Public Storage (PSA) trades at 30.5x forward P/E versus 391.7x for Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not — 361.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — SCCF or PSA?
In this comparison, SCCF (1.5% yield) pays a dividend. PSA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SCCF or PSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not (SCCF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.04), 1.5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCF: +21.6%, PSA: +64.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SCCF and PSA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. SCCF pays a dividend while PSA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.