Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) vs GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GEV | 8.9% revenue growth vs SMR's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | GEV | 12.8% net margin vs SMR's -5.9% |
| Stability / Safety | GEV | Beta 1.59 vs SMR's 2.36 |
| Dividends | GEV | 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; SMR pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GEV | +161.0% vs SMR's -25.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GEV | 7.8% ROA vs SMR's -43.0%, ROIC 27.9% vs -314.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
NuScale Power designs and sells small modular nuclear reactors for electricity generation and industrial heat applications. It generates revenue primarily through engineering, procurement, and construction contracts for its modular reactor systems, with future recurring revenue expected from long-term service agreements. The company's key advantage is its proprietary, passively safe reactor design — which is smaller, scalable, and factory-built — offering a standardized nuclear solution with lower upfront capital requirements than traditional large-scale plants.
GE Vernova is a diversified energy technology company that provides power generation equipment and grid solutions across multiple energy sources. It makes money primarily through three segments: Power (gas, nuclear, and hydro turbines), Wind (onshore and offshore wind turbines), and Electrification (grid equipment and power conversion systems). The company's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive energy portfolio—spanning traditional and renewable technologies—and its deep expertise in large-scale power infrastructure projects.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GEV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SMR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $38.1B annually — 595.9x SMR's $64M. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 12.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMR's -5.9%. On growth, SMR holds the edge at +16.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $64M | $38.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$627M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$380M | $4.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$584M | $3.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +19.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | +12.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | +3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.3% | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $249M | $235.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$587M | $226.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.92x | 49.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 61.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 101.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 19.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 63.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 39.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-87 for SMR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.4% | +39.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.0% | +7.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +27.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -87.8% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$836M | -$8.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $836M | $8.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $66,674 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,009 for SMR. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +161.0% total return vs SMR's -25.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 88.2% vs SMR's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.2% | +28.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.2% | +161.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.2% | +566.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.1% | +566.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.1% | +566.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.5% | +88.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GEV is the less volatile stock with a 1.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMR's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs SMR's 22.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.42 | $894.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.08 | $252.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.4% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.5 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23.6M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SMR as "Buy" and GEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.0% upside for SMR (target: $20) vs -4.5% for GEV (target: $835). GEV is the only dividend payer here at 0.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.17 | $834.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | 100 | 314.5 | +214.5% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 108.21 | 575.22 | +431.6% |
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) returned +567% over 5 years vs NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR)'s +20%. A $10,000 investment in GEV 5 years ago would be worth $66,674 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | $373000.00 | $0.00 | -100.0% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | $29.7B | $38.1B | +28.4% |
NuScale Power Corporation's revenue grew from $0M (2019) to $0M (2025) — a -100.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | -190.6% | -3.7% | +98.1% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | -9.2% | 12.8% | +239.1% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | -1.63 | -2.17 | -33.1% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | -10.06 | 17.69 | +275.8% |
NuScale Power Corporation's EPS grew from $-1.63 (2019) to $-2.17 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
NuScale Power Corporation generated $-871M FCF in 2025 (-761% vs 2021). GE Vernova Inc. generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+692% vs 2022).
SMR vs GEV: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMR or GEV a better buy right now?
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) offers the better valuation at 49.4x trailing P/E (61.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SMR or GEV?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) delivered a total return of +566.7%, compared to +20.1% for NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth approximately $67K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +566.7% versus SMR's +29.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SMR or GEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) is the lower-risk stock at 1.59β versus NuScale Power Corporation's 2.36β — meaning SMR is approximately 49% more volatile than GEV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — SMR or GEV?
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12.8% net margin versus -594.6% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 12.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEV leads at 3.6% versus -984.0% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMR leads at 66.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is SMR or GEV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMR: 57.0% to $20.17.
06Which pays a better dividend — SMR or GEV?
In this comparison, GEV (0.1% yield) pays a dividend. SMR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SMR or GEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+566.7% 10Y return). NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) carries a higher beta of 2.36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GEV: +566.7%, SMR: +29.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SMR and GEV?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.