Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ADI | 16.9% revenue growth vs QCOM's 13.7% |
| Value | QCOM | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 31.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | ADI | 23.0% net margin vs QCOM's 12.0% |
| Stability / Safety | QCOM | Beta 1.48 vs ADI's 1.55 |
| Dividends | QCOM | 2.4% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs ADI's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ADI | +56.4% vs QCOM's -7.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | QCOM | 10.1% ROA vs ADI's 5.6%, ROIC 29.1% vs 5.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Analog Devices is a semiconductor company that designs and manufactures analog, mixed-signal, and digital signal processing integrated circuits for industrial, automotive, communications, and consumer markets. It generates revenue primarily through sales of data converters (~30%), power management ICs (~25%), amplifiers (~15%), and RF/microwave components (~15%) to industrial and automotive customers. The company's moat lies in its deep expertise in high-performance analog design—a difficult-to-master discipline—and its extensive portfolio of precision components that are deeply embedded in mission-critical systems.
Qualcomm is a semiconductor and wireless technology company that designs and licenses foundational technologies for mobile communications. It generates revenue primarily through selling smartphone chipsets (~75% of revenue) and licensing its extensive patent portfolio for wireless standards like 5G (~25% of revenue). The company's key advantage is its massive portfolio of essential wireless patents—particularly in CDMA and 5G—which creates a licensing moat that generates high-margin recurring revenue.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ADI leads in 2 (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.9B annually — 3.8x ADI's $11.8B. ADI is the more profitable business, keeping 23.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QCOM's 12.0%. On growth, ADI holds the edge at +30.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.8B | $44.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.4B | $13.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $5.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.6B | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.8% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +27.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +28.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.4% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.7% | -1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 28.4x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 64% valuation discount to ADI's 78.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ADI offers better value at 11.45x vs QCOM's 13.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $173.7B | $152.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $179.9B | $161.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 78.02x | 28.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.50x | 12.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 11.45x | 13.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 36.47x | 11.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.76x | 3.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.23x | 7.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.60x | 11.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $8 for ADI. ADI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADI scores 8/9 vs QCOM's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | +10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.2B | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.5B | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.7B | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.80x | 18.76x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ADI five years ago would be worth $23,455 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,332 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, ADI leads with a +56.4% total return vs QCOM's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADI at 25.9% vs QCOM's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.0% | -17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.4% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.5% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.6% | +13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +621.4% | +234.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.9% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
QCOM is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADI's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADI currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs QCOM's 69.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $363.20 | $205.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $158.65 | $120.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +69.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.0 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ADI as "Buy" and QCOM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for QCOM (target: $162) vs 5.2% for ADI (target: $374). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.42% vs ADI's 1.09%.
| Metric | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $374.42 | $161.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 54 | 67 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 22 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.87 | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +5.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 100 | 284.77 | +184.8% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 189.45 | +89.4% |
Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) returned +135% over 5 years vs QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)'s +13%. A $10,000 investment in ADI 5 years ago would be worth $23,455 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | $3.4B | $11.0B | +222.1% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | $23.6B | $44.3B | +88.0% |
Analog Devices, Inc.'s revenue grew from $3.4B (2016) to $11.0B (2025) — a 13.9% CAGR. QUALCOMM Incorporated's revenue grew from $23.6B (2016) to $44.3B (2025) — a 7.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 25.2% | 20.6% | -18.3% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 24.2% | 12.5% | -48.3% |
Analog Devices, Inc.'s net margin went from 25% (2016) to 21% (2025). QUALCOMM Incorporated's net margin went from 24% (2016) to 13% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 38.9 | 59.5 | +53.0% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 39 | 34.1 | -12.6% |
Analog Devices, Inc. has traded in a 22x–65x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~78x. QUALCOMM Incorporated has traded in a 10x–39x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~28x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 2.76 | 4.56 | +65.2% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 3.81 | 5.01 | +31.5% |
Analog Devices, Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.76 (2016) to $4.56 (2025) — a 6% CAGR. QUALCOMM Incorporated's EPS grew from $3.81 (2016) to $5.01 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Analog Devices, Inc. generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+79% vs 2021). QUALCOMM Incorporated generated $13B FCF in 2025 (+48% vs 2021).
ADI vs QCOM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADI or QCOM a better buy right now?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 28.4x trailing P/E (12.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADI or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 28.4x versus Analog Devices, Inc. at 78.0x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 12.7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Analog Devices, Inc. wins at 4.62x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 6.13x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADI or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) delivered a total return of +134.6%, compared to +13.3% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). A $10,000 investment in ADI five years ago would be worth approximately $23K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADI returned +621.4% versus QCOM's +234.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADI or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.48β versus Analog Devices, Inc.'s 1.55β — meaning ADI is approximately 5% more volatile than QCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — ADI or QCOM?
Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) is the more profitable company, earning 20.6% net margin versus 12.5% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — meaning it keeps 20.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27.9% versus 26.6% for ADI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADI leads at 61.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ADI or QCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4.62x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 6.13x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 12.7x forward P/E versus 31.5x for Analog Devices, Inc. — 18.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QCOM: 13.4% to $161.50.
07Which pays a better dividend — ADI or QCOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the highest yield at 2.4%, versus 1.1% for Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI).
08Is ADI or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.1% yield, +621.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADI: +621.4%, QCOM: +234.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ADI and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.