Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) vs Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | AIEV | Beta 0.38 vs BABA's 0.90, lower leverage |
| Dividends | BABA | 1.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; AIEV pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BABA | +10.2% vs AIEV's -40.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BABA | 6.5% ROA vs AIEV's -12.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Thunder Power Holdings is an electric vehicle manufacturer that develops and produces a range of EVs including sedans, SUVs, and compact city cars. It generates revenue primarily through vehicle sales—with its long-range sedan and SUV models likely representing the bulk of sales—and potentially through future service or charging offerings. The company's competitive advantage lies in its focus on long-range battery technology and its diverse product portfolio targeting multiple vehicle segments.
Alibaba is a Chinese e-commerce and technology conglomerate that operates digital marketplaces connecting buyers and sellers. It generates revenue primarily from its core commerce segments — China Commerce (~65%) and International Commerce (~10%) — along with cloud services (~10%) and logistics through Cainiao. Its key competitive advantage is its massive ecosystem network effect, where its platforms like Taobao and Tmall create a self-reinforcing cycle of merchants and consumers that's difficult for competitors to replicate.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AIEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). BABA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
BABA and AIEV operate at a comparable scale, with $1.01T and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.4% | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $2.66T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $2.67T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.30x | 18.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 104.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 18.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 2.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 233.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-33 for AIEV. AIEV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BABA's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs AIEV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.7% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.7% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$49,161 | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52,616 | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3,455 | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 15.74x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in BABA five years ago would be worth $6,154 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $178 for AIEV. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +10.2% total return vs AIEV's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 19.2% vs AIEV's -73.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.0% | -7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.8% | +10.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +69.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -38.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +116.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.9% | +19.2% |
Risk & Volatility
AIEV is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BABA's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BABA currently trades 74.8% from its 52-week high vs AIEV's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.37 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $95.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +74.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 33.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 10.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $188.62 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jun 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | 100 | 1.55 | -98.5% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 233.29 | +133.3% |
Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) returned -38% over 5 years vs Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV)'s -98%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | $101.1B | $996.3B | +885.1% |
Alibaba Group Holding Limited's revenue grew from $101.1B (2016) to $996.3B (2025) — a 28.9% CAGR.
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 8.8 | 2.7 | -69.3% |
Alibaba Group Holding Limited has traded in a 2x–9x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~18x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | -0.02 | -0.06 | -203.0% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 34 | 53.6 | +57.6% |
Alibaba Group Holding Limited's EPS grew from $34.00 (2016) to $53.60 (2025) — a 5% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. generated $-1M FCF in 2024 (-142% vs 2021). Alibaba Group Holding Limited generated $78B FCF in 2025 (-57% vs 2021).
AIEV vs BABA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIEV or BABA a better buy right now?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 18.4x trailing P/E (3.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) a "Buy" — based on 58 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AIEV or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) delivered a total return of -38.5%, compared to -98.2% for Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV). A $10,000 investment in BABA five years ago would be worth approximately $6K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +116.1% versus AIEV's -98.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AIEV or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.38β versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited's 0.90β — meaning BABA is approximately 139% more volatile than AIEV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 23% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — AIEV or BABA?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.1% net margin versus 0.0% for Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14.1% versus 0.0% for AIEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BABA leads at 40.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — AIEV or BABA?
In this comparison, BABA (1.2% yield) pays a dividend. AIEV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is AIEV or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.90), 1.2% yield, +116.1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BABA: +116.1%, AIEV: -98.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between AIEV and BABA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. BABA pays a dividend while AIEV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.