Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) vs NIO Inc. (NIO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | AIEV | Beta 0.38 vs NIO's 0.91, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NIO | +5.2% vs AIEV's -40.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AIEV | -12.7% ROA vs NIO's -24.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Thunder Power Holdings is an electric vehicle manufacturer that develops and produces a range of EVs including sedans, SUVs, and compact city cars. It generates revenue primarily through vehicle sales—with its long-range sedan and SUV models likely representing the bulk of sales—and potentially through future service or charging offerings. The company's competitive advantage lies in its focus on long-range battery technology and its diverse product portfolio targeting multiple vehicle segments.
NIO is a Chinese premium electric vehicle manufacturer that designs, develops, and sells smart electric cars along with a comprehensive ecosystem of charging and service solutions. The company generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales—including SUVs and sedans—and secondarily from its innovative battery-as-a-service (BaaS) subscription model and energy solutions like its unique battery swap stations. NIO's key competitive advantage lies in its premium brand positioning, integrated user ecosystem—featuring its exclusive NIO Houses and mobile app community—and its pioneering battery swap technology that addresses range anxiety through rapid battery replacement.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AIEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NIO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NIO and AIEV operate at a comparable scale, with $69.4B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $69.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$23.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$24.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +10.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -35.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.4% | +7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $10.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $12.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.30x | -3.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 5.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AIEV delivers a -32.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-33 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NIO. AIEV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NIO's 2.50x.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.7% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.7% | -24.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -55.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -41.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 2.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$49,161 | $14.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52,616 | $19.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3,455 | $33.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -25.29x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NIO five years ago would be worth $979 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $178 for AIEV. Over the past 12 months, NIO leads with a +5.2% total return vs AIEV's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NIO at -19.7% vs AIEV's -73.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.0% | -5.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.8% | +5.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -90.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | -26.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.9% | -19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
AIEV is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NIO's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NIO currently trades 60.7% from its 52-week high vs AIEV's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.37 | $8.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $3.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +60.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 38.8M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | NIONIO Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jun 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | 100 | 1.55 | -98.5% |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | 100 | 101.8 | +1.8% |
NIO Inc. (NIO) returned -90% over 5 years vs Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV)'s -98%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | $0.00 | $65.7B | — |
NIO Inc.'s revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $65.7B (2024) — a 0.0% CAGR.
Chart 3EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | -0.02 | -0.06 | -203.0% |
| NIO Inc. (NIO) | -0.5 | -11.03 | -2106.0% |
NIO Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.50 (2016) to $-11.03 (2024).
Chart 4Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. generated $-1M FCF in 2024 (-142% vs 2021). NIO Inc. generated $-17B FCF in 2024 (-704% vs 2021).
AIEV vs NIO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIEV or NIO a better buy right now?
Analysts rate NIO Inc. (NIO) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AIEV or NIO?
Over the past 5 years, NIO Inc. (NIO) delivered a total return of -90.2%, compared to -98.2% for Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV). A $10,000 investment in NIO five years ago would be worth approximately $979 today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NIO returned -26.2% versus AIEV's -98.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AIEV or NIO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.38β versus NIO Inc.'s 0.91β — meaning NIO is approximately 140% more volatile than AIEV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for NIO Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — AIEV or NIO?
Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) is the more profitable company, earning 0.0% net margin versus -34.5% for NIO Inc. — meaning it keeps 0.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIEV leads at 0.0% versus -33.3% for NIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NIO leads at 9.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — AIEV or NIO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is AIEV or NIO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.38)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIEV: -98.2%, NIO: -26.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between AIEV and NIO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.