Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) vs Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | AMOD | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 36.7x) |
| Stability / Safety | AMOD | Beta 0.60 vs SRAD's 0.80 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SRAD | -15.5% vs AMOD's -75.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SRAD | 3.9% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Alpha Modus Holdings develops data-driven technologies that enhance in-store digital experiences for consumers at the point of purchase decision. It generates revenue primarily through technology licensing and patent monetization — including its 571-patent portfolio — with additional income from software development services. The company's key advantage lies in its extensive intellectual property portfolio covering retail technology, which creates barriers to entry for competitors.
Sportradar is a sports data and technology company that provides mission-critical data, odds, and content to sports betting operators, media companies, and sports leagues. It generates revenue primarily through data services to betting operators (roughly 70% of revenue) and media rights distribution to broadcasters (roughly 30%), with additional income from integrity monitoring and advertising solutions. The company's moat lies in its exclusive long-term partnerships with major sports leagues — including the NBA, NFL, and FIFA — which provide proprietary data feeds that competitors cannot replicate.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SRAD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AMOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
SRAD and AMOD operate at a comparable scale, with $1.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | SRADSportradar Group … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $451M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $200M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +57.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +14.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.2% | -41.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 0.7x trailing earnings, AMOD trades at a 100% valuation discount to SRAD's 154.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMOD's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SRAD's 7.3x.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | SRADSportradar Group … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.69x | 154.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 36.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.57x | 7.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SRAD scores 6/9 vs AMOD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | SRADSportradar Group … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.2% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$302M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $735,814 | $348M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $47M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.09x | 2.63x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SRAD five years ago would be worth $7,289 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $484 for AMOD. Over the past 12 months, SRAD leads with a -15.5% total return vs AMOD's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SRAD at 14.3% vs AMOD's -63.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | SRADSportradar Group … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | -21.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.4% | -15.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | +49.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -27.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -27.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.6% | +14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
AMOD is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SRAD's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SRAD currently trades 56.7% from its 52-week high vs AMOD's 19.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | SRADSportradar Group … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $32.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.40 | $15.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +56.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | AMODAlpha Modus Holdi… | SRADSportradar Group … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Dec 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 100 | 8.83 | -91.2% |
| Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) | 100 | 104.59 | +4.6% |
Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) returned -27% over 5 years vs Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD)'s -95%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) | $380M | $1.1B | +190.9% |
Sportradar Group AG's revenue grew from $380M (2019) to $1.1B (2024) — a 23.8% CAGR.
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) | 375.4 | 173.4 | -53.8% |
Sportradar Group AG has traded in a 101x–375x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~155x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 0.03 | 0.73 | +2167.1% |
| Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) | 0.03 | 0.1 | +287.6% |
Sportradar Group AG's EPS grew from $0.03 (2019) to $0.10 (2024) — a 31% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. generated $-2M FCF in 2024 (-36% vs 2021). Sportradar Group AG generated $125M FCF in 2024 (+8428% vs 2021).
AMOD vs SRAD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMOD or SRAD a better buy right now?
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) offers the better valuation at 0.7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMOD or SRAD?
On trailing P/E, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the cheapest at 0.7x versus Sportradar Group AG at 154.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMOD or SRAD?
Over the past 5 years, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) delivered a total return of -27.1%, compared to -95.2% for Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD). A $10,000 investment in SRAD five years ago would be worth approximately $7K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SRAD returned -27.1% versus AMOD's -95.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMOD or SRAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.60β versus Sportradar Group AG's 0.80β — meaning SRAD is approximately 33% more volatile than AMOD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — AMOD or SRAD?
Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the more profitable company, earning 3.1% net margin versus 0.0% for Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SRAD leads at 12.2% versus 0.0% for AMOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SRAD leads at 56.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AMOD or SRAD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AMOD or SRAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.60)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMOD: -95.2%, SRAD: -27.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AMOD and SRAD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: AMOD is a small-cap deep-value stock; SRAD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.