APOS
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$15.09B
5Y Perf.+1.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
APOS vs CG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
Asset Management
Market Cap$17.70B
5Y Perf.+56.5%
APOS vs CG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | APOS | CG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $15.09B | $17.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32.10B | $4.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.49B | $809M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 65.9% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | 26.2% |
| Forward P/E | 2.8x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $13.36B | $13.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20.59B | $3.21B |
APOS vs CG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
APOS
CG
| Stock | Aug 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo Global Manag… (APOS) | 100 | 101.4 | +1.4% |
| The Carlyle Group I… (CG) | 100 | 156.5 | +56.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APOS vs CG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CG leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Apollo Global Management, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
APOS
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
The Banking Pick
APOS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.16
- Rev growth 22.9%, EPS growth -25.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, Low D/E 31.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
The Banking Pick
CG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 281.0% 10Y total return vs APOS's 20.2%
- NIM 7.1% vs APOS's 4.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs APOS's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | APOS | 22.9% NII/revenue growth vs CG's 19.8% |
| Value | APOS | Lower P/E (2.8x vs 11.4x), PEG 0.04 vs 0.65 |
| Quality / Margins | CG | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs APOS's 0.8% (lower = leaner) |