Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) vs Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NAMI | 7.0% revenue growth vs AREN's -12.3% |
| Value | AREN | Lower P/E (3.5x vs 4.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AREN | 88.5% net margin vs NAMI's 5.0% |
| Stability / Safety | NAMI | Beta 0.63 vs AREN's 0.87 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AREN | +79.5% vs NAMI's -83.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AREN | 104.2% ROA vs NAMI's 9.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
The Arena Group Holdings operates a digital media platform that publishes and distributes content across sports, lifestyle, and news verticals. It generates revenue primarily through digital advertising — including display, video, and native ads — supplemented by subscription fees and content licensing. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary publishing platform that enables efficient content creation and distribution across multiple brands and channels.
Jinxin Technology is a Chinese digital content service provider that creates digital self-learning materials and leisure reading content for K-9 students. It generates revenue primarily through its Namibox learning app subscriptions and by licensing digital textbooks to telecom operators and third-party device manufacturers — with digital educational content making up the vast majority of its sales. The company's moat lies in its established partnerships with Chinese schools for mainstream textbook digitization and its early-mover advantage in the K-9 digital education space.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AREN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). NAMI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NAMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $406M annually — 2.8x AREN's $143M. AREN is the more profitable business, keeping 88.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAMI's 5.0%. On growth, NAMI holds the edge at -0.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | NAMIJinxin Technology… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $143M | $406M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $126M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.6% | +28.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +6.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +88.5% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.3% | -0.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.3% | -114.7% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AREN's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAMI's 60.0x.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | NAMIJinxin Technology… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137M | $508M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $257M | $496M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.01x | 4.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.52x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.62x | 60.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 8.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NAMI scores 4/9 vs AREN's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | NAMIJinxin Technology… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +94.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +104.2% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.6% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +18.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $119M | -$87M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $93M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $124M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.70x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AREN five years ago would be worth $1,642 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $993 for NAMI. Over the past 12 months, AREN leads with a +79.5% total return vs NAMI's -83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AREN at -28.4% vs NAMI's -53.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | NAMIJinxin Technology… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.8% | -42.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.5% | -83.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.2% | -90.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.6% | -90.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.9% | -90.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.4% | -53.7% |
Risk & Volatility
NAMI is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AREN's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AREN currently trades 28.8% from its 52-week high vs NAMI's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | NAMIJinxin Technology… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.05 | $4.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.34 | $0.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.8% | +9.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.3 | 31.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 20K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | NAMIJinxin Technology… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jan 25 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | 100 | 280.58 | +180.6% |
| Jinxin Technology H… (NAMI) | 90.09 | 14.89 | -83.5% |
The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) returned -84% over 5 years vs Jinxin Technology H… (NAMI)'s -90%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | $0.00 | $126M | — |
| Jinxin Technology H… (NAMI) | $248M | $406M | +63.8% |
The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $0M (2015) to $126M (2024) — a 0.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | -81.6% | -80.0% | +2.0% |
| Jinxin Technology H… (NAMI) | -32.3% | 5.0% | +115.4% |
The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from -82% (2017) to -80% (2024).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | -0.47 | -2.85 | -506.4% |
| Jinxin Technology H… (NAMI) | -3.06 | 0.73 | +123.9% |
The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.47 (2015) to $-2.85 (2024).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. generated $-21M FCF in 2024 (-7% vs 2021). Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares generated $-36M FCF in 2024 (+35% vs 2021).
AREN vs NAMI: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AREN or NAMI a better buy right now?
Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) offers the better valuation at 4.1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AREN or NAMI?
Over the past 5 years, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) delivered a total return of -83.6%, compared to -90.1% for Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI). A $10,000 investment in AREN five years ago would be worth approximately $2K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AREN returned -17.9% versus NAMI's -90.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AREN or NAMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.63β versus The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.'s 0.87β — meaning AREN is approximately 39% more volatile than NAMI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — AREN or NAMI?
Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) is the more profitable company, earning 5.0% net margin versus -80.0% for The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAMI leads at 6.7% versus 6.2% for AREN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AREN leads at 44.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — AREN or NAMI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is AREN or NAMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.63)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NAMI: -90.1%, AREN: -17.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between AREN and NAMI?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: AREN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NAMI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.