Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) vs Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BEP | 10.9% revenue growth vs AXIA's 0.2% |
| Quality / Margins | BEP | 3.3% net margin vs AXIA's -1.8% |
| Stability / Safety | AXIA | Lower D/E ratio (64.1% vs 99.8%) |
| Dividends | BEP | 12.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AXIA's 0.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BEP | +49.6% vs AXIA's +26.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BEP | 0.2% ROA vs AXIA's -0.2%, ROIC 1.0% vs 1.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
AXIA Energia is a Brazilian electric utility that generates, transmits, and sells electricity across Brazil. It earns revenue primarily from electricity sales to distributors and large consumers — with generation contributing roughly 70% and transmission about 30% of total revenue. The company's key advantage is its massive hydroelectric portfolio — Brazil's largest — which provides low-cost, renewable baseload power and significant operational scale.
Brookfield Renewable Partners is one of the world's largest publicly traded renewable power platforms, owning and operating hydroelectric, wind, solar, and storage facilities across multiple continents. It generates revenue primarily through long-term power purchase agreements — selling electricity to utilities and corporate customers — with additional income from development activities and asset sales. Its key advantage is scale and diversification across geographies and technologies, backed by Brookfield Asset Management's deep capital and operational expertise.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
BEP leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AXIA is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.1B annually — 4.1x BEP's $6.4B. BEP is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXIA's -1.8%. On growth, BEP holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.1B | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.9B | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$479M | $212M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | -$8.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.7% | +44.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | -128.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.4% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.1% | +25.3% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BEP's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AXIA's 52.8x.
| Metric | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.9B | $9.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.9B | $42.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 74.24x | -471.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.34x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.83x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 52.85x | 12.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.53x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 0.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 178.31x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BEP delivers a 0.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-0 for AXIA. AXIA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEP's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AXIA scores 6/9 vs BEP's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.4% | +0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $51.7B | $32.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26.6B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78.2B | $34.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.41x | 0.35x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AXIA five years ago would be worth $13,122 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,044 for BEP. Over the past 12 months, BEP leads with a +49.6% total return vs AXIA's +26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BEP at 11.4% vs AXIA's 8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.6% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.0% | +49.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.3% | +38.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.2% | -9.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | +214.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | +11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
| Metric | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.66 | $32.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.06 | $19.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 70.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 446K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AXIA as "Buy" and BEP as "Buy". For income investors, BEP offers the higher dividend yield at 12.72% vs AXIA's 0.17%.
| Metric | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +12.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $4.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | $9.7B | $7.5B | -23.5% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | $2.5B | $6.5B | +165.9% |
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.'s revenue grew from $2.5B (2016) to $6.5B (2025) — a 11.5% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | 10.1% | 25.8% | +156.1% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | -0.9% | -0.3% | +65.4% |
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.'s net margin went from -1% (2016) to -0% (2025).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | 6.5 | 20.7 | +218.5% |
AXIA Energia S.A. has traded in a 7x–26x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~74x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | 0.72 | 0.84 | +16.7% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | -0.15 | -0.07 | +55.1% |
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.'s EPS grew from $-0.15 (2016) to $-0.07 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
AXIA Energia S.A. generated $691M FCF in 2024 (-53% vs 2021). Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. generated $-5B FCF in 2025 (-324% vs 2021).
AXIA vs BEP: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AXIA or BEP a better buy right now?
AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) offers the better valuation at 74.2x trailing P/E (1.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AXIA or BEP?
Over the past 5 years, AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) delivered a total return of +31.2%, compared to -9.6% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). A $10,000 investment in AXIA five years ago would be worth approximately $13K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEP returned +214.6% versus AXIA's -92.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AXIA or BEP?
On balance sheet safety, AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 100% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — AXIA or BEP?
AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) is the more profitable company, earning 25.8% net margin versus -0.3% for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. — meaning it keeps 25.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AXIA leads at 34.5% versus 13.4% for BEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXIA leads at 44.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — AXIA or BEP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) offers the highest yield at 12.7%, versus 0.2% for AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA).
06Is AXIA or BEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.73), 12.7% yield, +214.6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEP: +214.6%, AXIA: -92.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between AXIA and BEP?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: AXIA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BEP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. BEP pays a dividend while AXIA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.