Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Bonk, Inc. (BNKK) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BNKK | 246.4% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% |
| Quality / Margins | WMT | 3.3% net margin vs BNKK's -45.9% |
| Stability / Safety | WMT | Beta 0.53 vs BNKK's 1.57 |
| Dividends | WMT | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; BNKK pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BNKK | +14.3% vs WMT's +30.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMT | 7.9% ROA vs BNKK's -41.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -6.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Bonk is a consumer products company that develops and sells over-the-counter wellness beverages and topical treatments. It generates revenue primarily from its flagship Safety Shot beverage — which claims to lower blood alcohol content — along with various skin and hair care products sold through retail and e-commerce channels. The company's main advantage lies in its proprietary beverage formula targeting the emerging "sober-curious" and wellness markets.
Walmart is the world's largest retailer operating a vast network of physical stores and e-commerce platforms. It generates revenue primarily through retail sales — with Walmart U.S. contributing about 65% of total revenue, Walmart International around 20%, and Sam's Club membership warehouse clubs roughly 15%. Its key competitive advantage is massive scale and supply chain efficiency, enabling everyday low prices that competitors struggle to match.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BNKK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 1852910.6x BNKK's $379,436. WMT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BNKK's -45.9%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BNKKBonk, Inc. | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $379,436 | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -174.9% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -75.0% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.9% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -35.5% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.7% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +156.3% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BNKKBonk, Inc. | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $1.02T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $1.08T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.26x | 46.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 29.21x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-75 for BNKK. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs BNKK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BNKKBonk, Inc. | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -75.4% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.4% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.9% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $348,816 | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -69.29x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in BNKK five years ago would be worth $152,756 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $30,135 for WMT. Over the past 12 months, BNKK leads with a +1427.6% total return vs WMT's +30.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BNKK at 148.1% vs WMT's 40.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BNKKBonk, Inc. | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.0% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1427.6% | +30.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1427.6% | +175.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1427.6% | +201.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1427.6% | +512.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +148.1% | +40.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BNKK's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs BNKK's 47.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BNKKBonk, Inc. | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.26 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.13 | $79.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.0% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 29.5M |
Analyst Outlook
WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BNKKBonk, Inc. | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $136.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bonk, Inc. (BNKK) | $3M | $701967.00 | -75.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | $485.9B | $713.2B | +46.8% |
Walmart Inc.'s revenue grew from $485.9B (2017) to $713.2B (2026) — a 4.4% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bonk, Inc. (BNKK) | -9.8% | -70.4% | -620.5% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 2.8% | 3.1% | +9.3% |
Walmart Inc.'s net margin went from 3% (2017) to 3% (2026).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 22.5 | 46.9 | +108.4% |
Walmart Inc. has traded in a 23x–53x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~47x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bonk, Inc. (BNKK) | -1.69 | -0.91 | +46.2% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 1.46 | 2.73 | +87.0% |
Walmart Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.46 (2017) to $2.73 (2026) — a 7% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Bonk, Inc. generated $-19M FCF in 2024 (-146% vs 2021). Walmart Inc. generated $42B FCF in 2026 (+61% vs 2021).
BNKK vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BNKK or WMT a better buy right now?
Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 46.9x trailing P/E (43.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BNKK or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Bonk, Inc. (BNKK) delivered a total return of +1428%, compared to +201.3% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). A $10,000 investment in BNKK five years ago would be worth approximately $153K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BNKK returned +1428% versus WMT's +512.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BNKK or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.53β versus Bonk, Inc.'s 1.57β — meaning BNKK is approximately 197% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — BNKK or WMT?
Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.1% net margin versus -70.4% for Bonk, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMT leads at 4.2% versus -59.9% for BNKK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — BNKK or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.7% yield) pays a dividend. BNKK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is BNKK or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.53), 0.7% yield, +512.5% 10Y return). Bonk, Inc. (BNKK) carries a higher beta of 1.57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +512.5%, BNKK: +1428%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between BNKK and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. WMT pays a dividend while BNKK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.