Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Berry Corporation (BRY) vs Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MNR | 27.2% revenue growth vs BRY's -9.2% |
| Value | MNR | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 13.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | MNR | 28.5% net margin vs BRY's -13.4% |
| Stability / Safety | MNR | Beta 0.68 vs BRY's 1.55 |
| Dividends | MNR | 24.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BRY's 19.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MNR | +0.9% vs BRY's -17.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNR | 7.7% ROA vs BRY's -6.6%, ROIC 11.7% vs 9.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Berry Corporation is an independent upstream energy company that develops and produces conventional oil reserves in the western United States. It makes money primarily through oil and gas production from its California and Utah basins — with additional revenue from well servicing and abandonment operations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive portfolio of mature, low-decline conventional oil fields and its integrated well servicing capabilities.
Mach Natural Resources is an independent oil and gas company that acquires, develops, and produces oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids reserves in the Anadarko Basin region. It makes money primarily from the sale of produced hydrocarbons — oil, natural gas, and NGLs — with revenue mix depending on commodity prices and production volumes. The company's competitive advantage lies in its strategic focus on the prolific Anadarko Basin and its operational expertise in developing these specific assets.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MNR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MNR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1.5x BRY's $680M. MNR is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRY's -13.4%. On growth, MNR holds the edge at +6.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | MNRMach Natural Reso… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $680M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $222M | $559M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$91M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $220M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +40.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +28.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.5% | +6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -137.4% | -140.0% |
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, MNR trades at a 47% valuation discount to BRY's 13.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BRY's 2.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNR's 5.1x.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | MNRMach Natural Reso… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $253M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $673M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.04x | 6.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.07x | 5.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 2.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 1.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.35x | 7.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNR delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-14 for BRY. BRY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNR's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BRY scores 6/9 vs MNR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | MNRMach Natural Reso… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.2% | +14.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.6% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +11.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $420M | $660M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $435M | $766M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.14x | 2.60x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in BRY five years ago would be worth $13,204 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,191 for MNR. Over the past 12 months, MNR leads with a +0.9% total return vs BRY's -17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNR at 0.6% vs BRY's -19.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | MNRMach Natural Reso… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.0% | +0.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.7% | +1.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.0% | +1.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +727900.0% | +1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.4% | +0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
MNR is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BRY's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNR currently trades 81.8% from its 52-week high vs BRY's 78.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | MNRMach Natural Reso… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.15 | $15.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.11 | $10.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 295K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BRY as "Hold" and MNR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 114.7% upside for BRY (target: $7) vs 45.9% for MNR (target: $19). For income investors, MNR offers the higher dividend yield at 24.36% vs BRY's 19.48%.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | MNRMach Natural Reso… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +19.5% | +24.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.63 | $3.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 23 | Dec 25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | 100 | 44.3 | -55.7% |
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 99.78 | 64.67 | -35.2% |
Berry Corporation (BRY) returned +32% over 5 years vs Mach Natural Resour… (MNR)'s +2%. A $10,000 investment in BRY 5 years ago would be worth $13,204 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | $604M | $784M | +29.7% |
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | $392M | $970M | +147.0% |
Berry Corporation's revenue grew from $604M (2015) to $784M (2024) — a 2.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | -168.0% | 2.5% | +101.5% |
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 35.3% | 19.1% | -45.8% |
Berry Corporation's net margin went from -168% (2015) to 2% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | 3.4 | 16.5 | +385.3% |
Berry Corporation has traded in a 3x–18x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~13x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | 0 | 0.25 | — |
| Mach Natural Resour… (MNR) | 1.46 | 1.9 | +30.1% |
Berry Corporation's EPS grew from $0.00 (2015) to $0.25 (2024).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Berry Corporation generated $108M FCF in 2024 (+1115% vs 2021). Mach Natural Resources LP generated $285M FCF in 2024 (+81% vs 2021).
BRY vs MNR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRY or MNR a better buy right now?
Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) offers the better valuation at 6.9x trailing P/E (12.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRY or MNR?
On trailing P/E, Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the cheapest at 6.9x versus Berry Corporation at 13.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRY or MNR?
Over the past 5 years, Berry Corporation (BRY) delivered a total return of +32.0%, compared to +1.9% for Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR). A $10,000 investment in BRY five years ago would be worth approximately $13K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRY returned +7279% versus MNR's +1.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRY or MNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.68β versus Berry Corporation's 1.55β — meaning BRY is approximately 128% more volatile than MNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Berry Corporation (BRY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 64% for Mach Natural Resources LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — BRY or MNR?
Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) is the more profitable company, earning 19.1% net margin versus 2.5% for Berry Corporation — meaning it keeps 19.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNR leads at 30.0% versus 19.5% for BRY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRY leads at 36.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BRY or MNR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRY: 114.7% to $7.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BRY or MNR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR) offers the highest yield at 24.4%, versus 19.5% for Berry Corporation (BRY).
08Is BRY or MNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Berry Corporation (BRY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (19.5% yield, +7279% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRY: +7279%, MNR: +1.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BRY and MNR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.