Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Pop Culture Group Co., Ltd (CPOP) vs Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CPOP | 155.5% revenue growth vs LYV's 8.8% |
| Quality / Margins | LYV | 3.7% net margin vs CPOP's -30.6% |
| Stability / Safety | CPOP | Beta 0.84 vs LYV's 0.90, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LYV | +13.1% vs CPOP's -51.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LYV | 3.9% ROA vs CPOP's -30.0%, ROIC 343.5% vs -40.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Pop Culture Group is a Chinese event management and entertainment company that hosts concerts, hip-hop events, and cultural festivals for corporate clients. It generates revenue primarily from event hosting and production services (roughly 60-70%) and complementary marketing and advertising services (30-40%). The company's key advantage is its specialized expertise in youth-oriented hip-hop and pop culture events—a niche with growing corporate sponsorship demand in China.
Live Nation Entertainment is the world's largest live entertainment company, operating concerts, festivals, and venue management globally. It generates revenue primarily through concert promotion and production (~60%), ticketing services via Ticketmaster (~30%), and sponsorship/advertising deals (~10%). Its key competitive advantage is its vertically integrated ecosystem—controlling artists, venues, ticketing, and sponsorships—which creates powerful network effects and barriers to entry.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LYV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CPOP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LYV is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.6B annually — 254.7x CPOP's $96M. LYV is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPOP's -30.6%. On growth, CPOP holds the edge at +74.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CPOPPop Culture Group… | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $24.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | $899M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.5% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.6% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +74.2% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +121.6% | -56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CPOPPop Culture Group… | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $188,222 | $38.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $33.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.08x | -675.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 101.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 1.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 42.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 114.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LYV delivers a 45.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $45 in annual profit, vs $-102 for CPOP. CPOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 2.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LYV scores 6/9 vs CPOP's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CPOPPop Culture Group… | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -102.2% | +45.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.0% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.9% | +3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.3% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 2.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $230,563 | $7.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -77.74x | 3.95x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in LYV five years ago would be worth $17,461 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11 for CPOP. Over the past 12 months, LYV leads with a +13.1% total return vs CPOP's -51.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYV at 31.0% vs CPOP's -66.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CPOPPop Culture Group… | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.4% | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.6% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +125.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +74.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +637.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -66.8% | +31.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CPOP is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LYV's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYV currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs CPOP's 12.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CPOPPop Culture Group… | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.61 | $175.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.30 | $112.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.5% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.7 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CPOPPop Culture Group… | LYVLive Nation Enter… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $181.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jun 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pop Culture Group C… (CPOP) | 100 | 0.14 | -99.9% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 162.48 | +62.5% |
Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) returned +75% over 5 years vs Pop Culture Group C… (CPOP)'s -100%. A $10,000 investment in LYV 5 years ago would be worth $17,461 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pop Culture Group C… (CPOP) | $9M | $47M | +453.0% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | $7.8B | $25.2B | +222.0% |
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s revenue grew from $7.8B (2016) to $25.2B (2025) — a 13.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pop Culture Group C… (CPOP) | 10.9% | -26.2% | -340.1% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 0.0% | 2.0% | +5134.0% |
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s net margin went from 0% (2016) to 2% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2022 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 109 | 47.3 | -56.6% |
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. has traded in a 47x–109x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-676x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pop Culture Group C… (CPOP) | 0.06 | -4.32 | -7240.5% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | -0.23 | -0.24 | -4.3% |
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.23 (2016) to $-0.24 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Pop Culture Group Co., Ltd generated $-5M FCF in 2024 (-28% vs 2021). Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. generated $334M FCF in 2025 (-79% vs 2021).
CPOP vs LYV: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPOP or LYV a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CPOP or LYV?
Over the past 5 years, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) delivered a total return of +74.6%, compared to -99.9% for Pop Culture Group Co., Ltd (CPOP). A $10,000 investment in LYV five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +637.3% versus CPOP's -99.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CPOP or LYV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pop Culture Group Co., Ltd (CPOP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.84β versus Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.'s 0.90β — meaning LYV is approximately 8% more volatile than CPOP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pop Culture Group Co., Ltd (CPOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 3% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — CPOP or LYV?
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) is the more profitable company, earning 2.0% net margin versus -26.2% for Pop Culture Group Co., Ltd — meaning it keeps 2.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LYV leads at 5.0% versus -28.8% for CPOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LYV leads at 46.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CPOP or LYV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is CPOP or LYV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.90), +637.3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYV: +637.3%, CPOP: -99.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CPOP and LYV?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 27%