Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) vs Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | INR | 60.2% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% |
| Value | INR | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 14.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | CTRA | 62.4% net margin vs INR's -0.6% |
| Stability / Safety | CTRA | Beta 0.63 vs INR's 1.05, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CTRA | 2.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; INR pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CTRA | +16.6% vs INR's -7.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CTRA | 7.7% ROA vs INR's -0.2%, ROIC 11.4% vs 10.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Coterra Energy is an independent oil and gas producer focused on developing natural gas and crude oil reserves across premier U.S. shale basins. It generates revenue primarily from selling natural gas (roughly 60% of production) and crude oil/liquids (roughly 40%), with its largest operations in the Marcellus Shale and Permian Basin. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost, high-quality asset portfolio across multiple basins — particularly its core Marcellus position — which provides operational flexibility and resilience across commodity price cycles.
Infinity Natural Resources is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on developing shale resources in the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from selling crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids extracted from its Utica and Marcellus shale acreage in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The company's competitive advantage lies in its concentrated acreage position in prolific shale plays — particularly its approximately 63,000 net acres in the Utica Shale — which provides operational scale and resource density.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CTRA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CTRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 8.9x INR's $308M. CTRA is the more profitable business, keeping 62.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INR's -0.6%. On growth, INR holds the edge at +15.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $308M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.8B | $76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | -$124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.4% | +53.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +89.1% | -4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +62.4% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +81.0% | -40.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +15.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | -80.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 4.5x trailing earnings, INR trades at a 67% valuation discount to CTRA's 13.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTRA's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INR's 4486.8x.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.2B | $751.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23.3B | $751.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.60x | 4.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.65x | 6.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.84x | 4486.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.44x | 2899.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.77x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTRA delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-0 for INR. CTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INR's 0.51x.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | -0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | +13.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $136M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $114M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $250M | $261M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.24x | -0.49x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
Over the past 12 months, CTRA leads with a +16.6% total return vs INR's -7.7%.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.0% | +12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.6% | -7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.1% | — |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.1% | — |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.4% | — |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.3% | — |
Risk & Volatility
CTRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INR's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTRA currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs INR's 83.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.67 | $19.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.33 | $11.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.3M | 153K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CTRA as "Buy" and INR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.5% upside for INR (target: $20) vs 5.9% for CTRA (target: $32). CTRA is the only dividend payer here at 2.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.40 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 55 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 25 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 99.18 | -0.8% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | ∞ | ∞ | NaN% |
Infinity Natural Re… (INR) returned +InfinityK% over 5 years vs Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA)'s +96%. A $10,000 investment in INR 5 years ago would be worth $∞ today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | $1.2B | $2.8B | +130.3% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | $143M | $259M | +80.9% |
Coterra Energy Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.2B (2016) to $2.8B (2025) — a 9.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | -34.9% | 62.4% | +278.8% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | 47.6% | 19.0% | -60.0% |
Coterra Energy Inc.'s net margin went from -35% (2016) to 62% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 130 | 11.7 | -91.0% |
Coterra Energy Inc. has traded in a 5x–130x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | -0.91 | 2.25 | +347.3% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | 1.16 | 3.72 | +220.7% |
Coterra Energy Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.91 (2016) to $2.25 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Coterra Energy Inc. generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+328% vs 2021). Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. generated $-78M FCF in 2024 (-156% vs 2022).
CTRA vs INR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTRA or INR a better buy right now?
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) offers the better valuation at 4.5x trailing P/E (6.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTRA or INR?
On trailing P/E, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) is the cheapest at 4.5x versus Coterra Energy Inc. at 13.6x. On forward P/E, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6.1x.
03Which is safer — CTRA or INR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.63β versus Infinity Natural Resources, Inc.'s 1.05β — meaning INR is approximately 66% more volatile than CTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 51% for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — CTRA or INR?
Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62.4% net margin versus 19.0% for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89.1% versus 36.2% for INR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTRA leads at 60.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is CTRA or INR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) trades at 6.1x forward P/E versus 14.6x for Coterra Energy Inc. — 8.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INR: 20.5% to $20.00.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTRA or INR?
In this comparison, CTRA (2.9% yield) pays a dividend. INR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is CTRA or INR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.63), 2.9% yield). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTRA and INR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. CTRA pays a dividend while INR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.