Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) vs Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WDS | -1.5% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% |
| Value | CTRA | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 29.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | CTRA | 62.4% net margin vs WDS's 24.1% |
| Stability / Safety | CTRA | Beta 0.63 vs WDS's 0.82, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CTRA | 2.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WDS's 5.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WDS | +40.1% vs CTRA's +16.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WDS | 9.5% ROA vs CTRA's 7.7%, ROIC 6.3% vs 11.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Coterra Energy is an independent oil and gas producer focused on developing natural gas and crude oil reserves across premier U.S. shale basins. It generates revenue primarily from selling natural gas (roughly 60% of production) and crude oil/liquids (roughly 40%), with its largest operations in the Marcellus Shale and Permian Basin. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost, high-quality asset portfolio across multiple basins — particularly its core Marcellus position — which provides operational flexibility and resilience across commodity price cycles.
Woodside Energy Group is an Australian oil and gas company that explores for, develops, and produces hydrocarbons — primarily liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil — from assets across Australia, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. It generates revenue by selling LNG (its largest segment), pipeline gas, crude oil, condensate, and liquefied petroleum gas, with LNG exports to Asia being the dominant earnings driver. The company's competitive advantage lies in its ownership of large-scale, low-cost LNG production assets in Australia — particularly the North West Shelf and Pluto projects — which benefit from proximity to major Asian energy markets.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CTRA leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WDS is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.2B annually — 9.5x CTRA's $2.8B. CTRA is the more profitable business, keeping 62.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WDS's 24.1%. On growth, WDS holds the edge at -11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | WDSWoodside Energy G… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.8B | $26.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.8B | $18.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $6.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | -$1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.4% | +37.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +89.1% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +62.4% | +24.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +81.0% | -5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | -11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | -15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, CTRA trades at a 6% valuation discount to WDS's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTRA's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WDS's 5.0x.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | WDSWoodside Energy G… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.2B | $38.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23.3B | $46.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.60x | 14.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.65x | 29.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.84x | 4.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.44x | 3.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.77x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDS delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for CTRA. CTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WDS's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTRA scores 6/9 vs WDS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | WDSWoodside Energy G… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +9.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $136M | $8.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $114M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $250M | $13.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.24x | 109.20x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CTRA five years ago would be worth $19,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,004 for WDS. Over the past 12 months, WDS leads with a +40.1% total return vs CTRA's +16.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTRA at 10.3% vs WDS's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | WDSWoodside Energy G… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.0% | +28.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.6% | +40.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.1% | +2.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.1% | +40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.4% | +74.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.3% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CTRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WDS's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WDS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs CTRA's 93.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | WDSWoodside Energy G… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.67 | $20.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.33 | $11.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 68.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.3M | 777K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CTRA as "Buy" and WDS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.7% upside for WDS (target: $28) vs 5.9% for CTRA (target: $32). For income investors, WDS offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs CTRA's 2.93%.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | WDSWoodside Energy G… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.40 | $28.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 55 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 191.13 | +91.1% |
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 100 | 91.8 | -8.2% |
Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) returned +96% over 5 years vs Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS)'s +40%. A $10,000 investment in CTRA 5 years ago would be worth $19,613 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | $1.2B | $2.8B | +130.3% |
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | $4.1B | $13.0B | +218.6% |
Coterra Energy Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.2B (2016) to $2.8B (2025) — a 9.7% CAGR. Woodside Energy Group Ltd's revenue grew from $4.1B (2016) to $13.0B (2025) — a 13.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | -34.9% | 62.4% | +278.8% |
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 21.3% | 20.9% | -1.7% |
Coterra Energy Inc.'s net margin went from -35% (2016) to 62% (2025). Woodside Energy Group Ltd's net margin went from 21% (2016) to 21% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 130 | 11.7 | -91.0% |
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 20.9 | 11 | -47.4% |
Coterra Energy Inc. has traded in a 5x–130x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. Woodside Energy Group Ltd has traded in a 6x–65x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | -0.91 | 2.25 | +347.3% |
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 1.04 | 1.42 | +36.5% |
Coterra Energy Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.91 (2016) to $2.25 (2025). Woodside Energy Group Ltd's EPS grew from $1.04 (2016) to $1.42 (2025) — a 4% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Coterra Energy Inc. generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+328% vs 2021). Woodside Energy Group Ltd generated $-782M FCF in 2025 (-167% vs 2021).
CTRA vs WDS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTRA or WDS a better buy right now?
Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) offers the better valuation at 13.6x trailing P/E (14.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTRA or WDS?
On trailing P/E, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the cheapest at 13.6x versus Woodside Energy Group Ltd at 14.4x. On forward P/E, Coterra Energy Inc. is actually cheaper at 14.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTRA or WDS?
Over the past 5 years, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) delivered a total return of +96.1%, compared to +40.0% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). A $10,000 investment in CTRA five years ago would be worth approximately $20K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTRA returned +90.4% versus WDS's +74.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTRA or WDS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.63β versus Woodside Energy Group Ltd's 0.82β — meaning WDS is approximately 30% more volatile than CTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 34% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CTRA or WDS?
Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62.4% net margin versus 20.9% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd — meaning it keeps 62.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89.1% versus 29.8% for WDS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTRA leads at 60.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CTRA or WDS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) trades at 14.6x forward P/E versus 29.8x for Woodside Energy Group Ltd — 15.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDS: 36.7% to $28.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — CTRA or WDS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) offers the highest yield at 5.1%, versus 2.9% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA).
08Is CTRA or WDS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.63), 2.9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRA: +90.4%, WDS: +74.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CTRA and WDS?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.