Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) vs Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EE | 1.4K% revenue growth vs HTOO's -61.3% |
| Quality / Margins | EE | 17.5% net margin vs HTOO's -6.6% |
| Stability / Safety | EE | Beta 0.59 vs HTOO's 0.71, lower leverage |
| Dividends | EE | 100.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; HTOO pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | EE | +32.1% vs HTOO's -75.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EE | 13.5% ROA vs HTOO's -73.2%, ROIC 97.4% vs -96.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Excelerate Energy is a specialized LNG infrastructure company that provides flexible floating regasification and natural gas supply solutions worldwide. It generates revenue primarily through long-term contracts for its floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) — which account for the majority of its income — along with LNG trading and terminal services. The company's key advantage is its fleet of proprietary FSRU technology that can be rapidly deployed to create LNG import terminals without the need for costly fixed infrastructure.
Fusion Fuel Green is a green hydrogen technology company that develops and deploys integrated solar-to-hydrogen systems for clean energy production. It makes money through selling its proprietary hydrogen generators, supplying green hydrogen output from its own plants, and providing operational services—with project development and technology sales being its primary revenue drivers. The company's key advantage is its integrated solar-to-hydrogen technology platform that combines concentrated solar power with electrolysis in a single modular unit, offering potentially lower-cost green hydrogen production.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
EE leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
EE is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.5B annually — 67473.0x HTOO's $5M. EE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTOO's -6.6%.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $318.5B | $5M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103.0B | -$36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55.9B | -$31M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $870.7B | -$18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -198.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1155.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.0% | +52.5% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $10M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.45x | -3.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.29x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.01x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 4.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 4.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EE delivers a 25.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-11 for HTOO. EE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HTOO's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EE scores 6/9 vs HTOO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.1% | -11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.5% | -73.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +97.4% | -96.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +82.2% | -92.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$172M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $538M | $214,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $367M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -32.36x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in EE five years ago would be worth $15,201 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $59 for HTOO. Over the past 12 months, EE leads with a +32.1% total return vs HTOO's -75.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EE at 23.6% vs HTOO's -70.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.0% | -6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.1% | -75.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | -97.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.0% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.0% | -99.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.6% | -70.1% |
Risk & Volatility
EE is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTOO's 0.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EE currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs HTOO's 23.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.07 | $14.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.29 | $2.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +23.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 305K | 69K |
Analyst Outlook
EE is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | EEExcelerate Energy… | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.17 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $278.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excelerate Energy, … (EE) | 100 | 134.23 | +34.2% |
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | 100 | 1.13 | -98.9% |
Excelerate Energy, … (EE) returned +52% over 5 years vs Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO)'s -99%. A $10,000 investment in EE 5 years ago would be worth $15,201 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excelerate Energy, … (EE) | $544M | $1.2T | +225516.5% |
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | $0.00 | $2M | — |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excelerate Energy, … (EE) | 10.1% | 18.1% | +80.1% |
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | -7.5% | -8.6% | -14.8% |
Excelerate Energy, Inc.'s net margin went from 10% (2019) to 18% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2022 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excelerate Energy, … (EE) | 8.2 | 21.9 | +167.1% |
Excelerate Energy, Inc. has traded in a 8x–24x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~31x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excelerate Energy, … (EE) | 2.25 | 1.28 | -43.1% |
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | 0.38 | -0.75 | -297.4% |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Excelerate Energy, Inc. generated $-721B FCF in 2025 (-683564% vs 2021). Fusion Fuel Green PLC generated $-7M FCF in 2024 (+88% vs 2021).
EE vs HTOO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EE or HTOO a better buy right now?
Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) offers the better valuation at 31.4x trailing P/E (22.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EE or HTOO?
Over the past 5 years, Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) delivered a total return of +52.0%, compared to -99.4% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO). A $10,000 investment in EE five years ago would be worth approximately $15K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EE returned +52.0% versus HTOO's -99.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EE or HTOO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.59β versus Fusion Fuel Green PLC's 0.71β — meaning HTOO is approximately 21% more volatile than EE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 21% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — EE or HTOO?
Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) is the more profitable company, earning 18.1% net margin versus -858.9% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC — meaning it keeps 18.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EE leads at 21.7% versus -1070.5% for HTOO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTOO leads at 27.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — EE or HTOO?
In this comparison, EE (100.0% yield) pays a dividend. HTOO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is EE or HTOO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Excelerate Energy, Inc. (EE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.59), 100.0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EE: +52.0%, HTOO: -99.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between EE and HTOO?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: EE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HTOO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EE pays a dividend while HTOO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.