Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ORCL | 8.4% revenue growth vs EEFT's 8.2% |
| Value | EEFT | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 19.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | ORCL | 25.3% net margin vs EEFT's 7.3% |
| Stability / Safety | EEFT | Beta 1.09 vs ORCL's 1.40, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ORCL | 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; EEFT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ORCL | -11.2% vs EEFT's -32.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ORCL | 7.5% ROA vs EEFT's 4.8%, ROIC 12.8% vs 26.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Euronet Worldwide is a global payment processing company that operates ATMs, provides electronic fund transfer services, and distributes prepaid mobile products. It generates revenue primarily from transaction fees across its ATM network (42,700+ terminals), POS processing services (438,000+ terminals), and prepaid mobile top-up distribution — with its Electronic Fund Transfer Processing segment being the largest contributor. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive global physical infrastructure network and established relationships with financial institutions worldwide, creating significant barriers to entry in the payment processing space.
Oracle is a global enterprise software and cloud computing company that provides database management systems, enterprise applications, and cloud infrastructure services. It generates revenue primarily through cloud services and license support (~70% of total revenue) and cloud license and on-premise license sales (~20%), with hardware and services making up the remainder. The company's key moat is its entrenched position in enterprise database software—particularly with its flagship Oracle Database—which creates significant switching costs and lock-in for large corporate customers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
ORCL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). EEFT leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.0B annually — 14.6x EEFT's $4.2B. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EEFT's 7.3%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EEFTEuronet Worldwide… | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $61.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $685M | $22.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $304M | $15.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $334M | -$13.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +70.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +30.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +25.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | -21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.3% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, EEFT trades at a 68% valuation discount to ORCL's 33.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ORCL offers better value at 4.72x vs EEFT's 14.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | EEFTEuronet Worldwide… | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $408.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $501.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.78x | 33.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.40x | 19.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 14.56x | 4.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.86x | 21.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 7.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.72x | 19.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.75x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 50.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $24 for EEFT. EEFT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EEFT scores 7/9 vs ORCL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | EEFTEuronet Worldwide… | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.8% | +50.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.3% | +12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.3% | +14.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.70x | 4.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $162M | $93.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $10.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $104.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.22x | 3.24x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $23,146 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,542 for EEFT. Over the past 12 months, ORCL leads with a -11.2% total return vs EEFT's -32.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORCL at 19.9% vs EEFT's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EEFTEuronet Worldwide… | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.1% | -25.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.1% | -11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.1% | +72.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.6% | +131.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | +327.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.9% | +19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
EEFT is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EEFT currently trades 60.9% from its 52-week high vs ORCL's 42.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EEFTEuronet Worldwide… | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.25 | $345.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.34 | $118.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.9% | +42.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 566K | 20.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EEFT as "Buy" and ORCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.5% upside for ORCL (target: $296) vs 44.9% for EEFT (target: $101). ORCL is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | EEFTEuronet Worldwide… | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $100.75 | $295.85 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 86 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.2% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT) | 100 | 59.63 | -40.4% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 327.66 | +227.7% |
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) returned +131% over 5 years vs Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT)'s -55%. A $10,000 investment in ORCL 5 years ago would be worth $23,146 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT) | $2.0B | $4.0B | +103.7% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | $37.0B | $57.4B | +54.9% |
Oracle Corporation's revenue grew from $37.0B (2016) to $57.4B (2025) — a 5.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT) | 8.9% | 7.7% | -13.9% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 24.0% | 21.7% | -9.8% |
Oracle Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2016) to 22% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT) | 29.6 | 15.9 | -46.3% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 21.4 | 44.9 | +109.8% |
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has traded in a 16x–90x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~11x. Oracle Corporation has traded in a 18x–53x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~34x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT) | 3.23 | 6.45 | +99.7% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 2.07 | 4.34 | +109.7% |
Oracle Corporation's EPS grew from $2.07 (2016) to $4.34 (2025) — a 9% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. generated $616M FCF in 2024 (+96% vs 2021). Oracle Corporation generated $-394M FCF in 2025 (-103% vs 2021).
EEFT vs ORCL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EEFT or ORCL a better buy right now?
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) offers the better valuation at 10.8x trailing P/E (6.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EEFT or ORCL?
On trailing P/E, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) is the cheapest at 10.8x versus Oracle Corporation at 33.5x. On forward P/E, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6.4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Oracle Corporation wins at 2.78x versus Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s 14.56x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EEFT or ORCL?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +131.5%, compared to -54.6% for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT). A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth approximately $23K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +327.4% versus EEFT's +6.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EEFT or ORCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.09β versus Oracle Corporation's 1.40β — meaning ORCL is approximately 28% more volatile than EEFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 170% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — EEFT or ORCL?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.7% net margin versus 7.7% for Euronet Worldwide, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30.8% versus 12.6% for EEFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORCL leads at 70.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EEFT or ORCL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2.78x versus Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s 14.56x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) trades at 6.4x forward P/E versus 19.7x for Oracle Corporation — 13.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORCL: 103.5% to $295.85.
07Which pays a better dividend — EEFT or ORCL?
In this comparison, ORCL (1.1% yield) pays a dividend. EEFT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is EEFT or ORCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.1% yield, +327.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORCL: +327.4%, EEFT: +6.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EEFT and ORCL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: EEFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ORCL pays a dividend while EEFT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.