Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) vs Block, Inc. (XYZ) vs Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) vs Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) vs Toast, Inc. (TOST) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 5 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAFRM38.8% revenue growth vs XYZ's 0.3%
ValueEEFTLower P/E (6.4x vs 22.4x)
Quality / MarginsCPAY24.4% net margin vs XYZ's 5.4%
Stability / SafetyEEFTBeta 1.09 vs AFRM's 2.41, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)XYZ-2.5% vs EEFT's -32.1%
Efficiency (ROA)TOST10.9% ROA vs AFRM's 2.2%, ROIC 30.8% vs -0.7%
Bottom line: EEFT leads in 2 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Block, Inc. is the better choice for recent price momentum and sentiment. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Valuation efficiency (growth/$)

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.
Technology

Euronet Worldwide is a global payment processing company that operates ATMs, provides electronic fund transfer services, and distributes prepaid mobile products. It generates revenue primarily from transaction fees across its ATM network (42,700+ terminals), POS processing services (438,000+ terminals), and prepaid mobile top-up distribution — with its Electronic Fund Transfer Processing segment being the largest contributor. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive global physical infrastructure network and established relationships with financial institutions worldwide, creating significant barriers to entry in the payment processing space.

XYZBlock, Inc.
Technology

Block is a financial technology company that provides payment processing and business software tools primarily for small and medium-sized businesses. It generates revenue primarily from transaction fees on payment processing — about 90% of total revenue — with additional income from subscription services, hardware sales, and banking services like Cash App. The company's key advantage is its integrated ecosystem that combines payment hardware, software, and banking services, creating network effects and high switching costs for merchants.

CPAYCorpay, Inc.
Technology

Corpay is a global payments company that helps businesses manage vehicle-related expenses, corporate payments, and lodging costs. It generates revenue primarily through transaction fees from its vehicle payment solutions — fuel, tolls, and fleet maintenance — and corporate payment automation services, with its cross-border and virtual card products forming significant segments. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized vertical expertise in complex business payments and its established network of merchants and fuel providers across multiple countries.

AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
Technology

Affirm operates a buy-now-pay-later platform that enables consumers to split purchases into installment payments at online and physical retailers. It generates revenue primarily from merchant fees — typically 3-6% of transaction value — and interest income from longer-term loans to consumers. Its key advantage is a transparent, fee-free model that builds consumer trust and a growing merchant network that creates a two-sided marketplace effect.

TOSTToast, Inc.
Technology

Toast is a cloud-based restaurant management platform that provides point-of-sale systems, payment processing, and operational software to eateries. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its software platform (about 25% of revenue) and payment processing fees from restaurant transactions (roughly 70% of revenue). The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated ecosystem—combining hardware, software, and payments—which creates high switching costs for restaurants once they adopt the full Toast system.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EEFTEuronet Worldwide, Inc.
FY 2024
Money Transfer Segment
42.2%$1.7B
EFT Processing Segment
29.0%$1.2B
Epay Segment
28.8%$1.2B
XYZBlock, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Solutions
100.0%$4.2B
CPAYCorpay, Inc.
FY 2024
Payments
54.0%$2.0B
Corporate Payments
32.9%$1.2B
Lodging
13.1%$489M
AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Merchant Network
79.2%$883M
Virtual Card Network
20.8%$231M
TOSTToast, Inc.
FY 2024
Technology Service
85.2%$4.1B
License
14.8%$706M

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

EEFT 1CPAY 1TOST 1XYZ 0AFRM 0
Financial MetricsCPAY4/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsEEFT5/7 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyTOST6/9 metrics
Total ReturnsTie2/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityTie1/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

CPAY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics). EEFT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Financial Metrics (TTM)

XYZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.2B annually — 8.3x AFRM's $2.9B. CPAY is the more profitable business, keeping 24.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XYZ's 5.4%. On growth, TOST holds the edge at +22.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEEFTEuronet Worldwide…XYZBlock, Inc.CPAYCorpay, Inc.AFRMAffirm Holdings, …TOSTToast, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.2B$24.2B$4.3B$2.9B$6.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$685M$1.7B$2.3B$420M$361M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$304M$1.3B$1.1B$282M$342M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$334M$2.4B$1.1B$619M$608M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.9%+42.8%+76.1%+59.5%+25.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.2%+7.1%+44.5%+7.9%+4.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.3%+5.4%+24.4%+9.7%+5.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.0%+10.0%+26.5%+21.2%+9.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.2%+3.6%+13.9%-62.1%+22.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-14.3%-93.8%+0.3%+60.9%+190.9%
CPAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 10.8x trailing earnings, EEFT trades at a 97% valuation discount to AFRM's 313.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYZ offers better value at 0.83x vs EEFT's 14.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricEEFTEuronet Worldwide…XYZBlock, Inc.CPAYCorpay, Inc.AFRMAffirm Holdings, …TOSTToast, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.9B$38.4B$22.8B$15.3B$14.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.1B$39.1B$29.3B$21.8B$13.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.78x30.33x23.27x313.20x48.77x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.40x19.00x12.50x43.63x22.38x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate14.56x0.83x3.30x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.86x22.87x13.68x158.00x34.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.73x1.59x5.74x4.74x2.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.72x1.79x7.42x5.22x7.80x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.75x15.82x12.92x25.38x23.49x
EEFT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CPAY delivers a 25.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $6 for XYZ. TOST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRM's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EEFT scores 7/9 vs CPAY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEEFTEuronet Worldwide…XYZBlock, Inc.CPAYCorpay, Inc.AFRMAffirm Holdings, …TOSTToast, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+23.8%+5.9%+25.5%+8.0%+16.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.8%+3.3%+5.3%+2.2%+10.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+26.3%+6.4%+14.7%-0.7%+30.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.3%+6.0%+20.0%-0.9%+15.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.70x0.33x2.54x2.56x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$162M$725M$6.4B$6.5B-$1.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.9B$6.6B$1.6B$1.4B$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.1B$7.3B$8.0B$7.9B$40M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.22x13.21x4.97x1.49x
TOST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in CPAY five years ago would be worth $11,508 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,643 for XYZ. Over the past 12 months, XYZ leads with a -2.5% total return vs EEFT's -32.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFRM at 51.1% vs EEFT's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEEFTEuronet Worldwide…XYZBlock, Inc.CPAYCorpay, Inc.AFRMAffirm Holdings, …TOSTToast, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.1%-2.2%+8.2%-36.5%-19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-32.1%-2.5%-11.4%-26.8%-29.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.1%-17.0%+51.4%+244.9%+44.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.6%-73.6%+15.1%-48.6%-56.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+6.1%+510.2%+154.6%-51.7%-56.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-13.9%-6.0%+14.8%+51.1%+13.0%
Evenly matched — XYZ and CPAY and AFRM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EEFT is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CPAY currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs AFRM's 47.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEEFTEuronet Worldwide…XYZBlock, Inc.CPAYCorpay, Inc.AFRMAffirm Holdings, …TOSTToast, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.09x1.59x1.46x2.41x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$114.25$82.50$375.61$100.00$49.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$64.34$44.27$252.84$30.90$24.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+60.9%+77.2%+86.6%+47.0%+55.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.145.650.934.444.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded566K5.8M512K5.3M9.2M
Evenly matched — EEFT and CPAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Analyst consensus: EEFT as "Buy", XYZ as "Buy", CPAY as "Buy", AFRM as "Buy", TOST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.7% upside for AFRM (target: $84) vs 11.4% for CPAY (target: $362).

MetricEEFTEuronet Worldwide…XYZBlock, Inc.CPAYCorpay, Inc.AFRMAffirm Holdings, …TOSTToast, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$100.75$84.67$362.29$84.40$39.82
# AnalystsCovering analysts2333183229
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.2%0.0%+5.6%+1.6%+0.7%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockOct 21Feb 26Change
Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT)10054.99-45.0%
Block, Inc. (XYZ)10025.24-74.8%
Corpay, Inc. (CPAY)100114.31+14.3%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)10052.6-47.4%
Toast, Inc. (TOST)85.6750.42-41.1%

Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) returned +15% over 5 years vs Block, Inc. (XYZ)'s -74%. A $10,000 investment in CPAY 5 years ago would be worth $11,508 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT)$2.0B$4.0B+103.7%
Block, Inc. (XYZ)$1.7B$24.2B+1315.9%
Corpay, Inc. (CPAY)$1.8B$4.0B+117.0%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)$264M$3.2B+1119.7%
Toast, Inc. (TOST)$665M$6.2B+825.3%

Block, Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.7B (2016) to $24.2B (2025) — a 34.2% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT)8.9%7.7%-13.9%
Block, Inc. (XYZ)-10.0%5.4%+153.7%
Corpay, Inc. (CPAY)24.7%25.3%+2.2%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)-45.6%1.6%+103.6%
Toast, Inc. (TOST)-31.4%5.6%+117.7%

Block, Inc.'s net margin went from -10% (2016) to 5% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years

Stock20172025Change
Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT)29.615.9-46.3%
Block, Inc. (XYZ)77.231-59.8%
Corpay, Inc. (CPAY)24.324.2-0.4%

Euronet Worldwide, Inc. has traded in a 16x–90x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~11x. Block, Inc. has traded in a 19x–495x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~30x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT)3.236.45+99.7%
Block, Inc. (XYZ)-0.52.1+520.0%
Corpay, Inc. (CPAY)4.7513.97+194.1%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)-0.470.15+131.9%
Toast, Inc. (TOST)-0.450.56+224.4%

Block, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.50 (2016) to $2.10 (2025).

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$314M
$544M
$1B
$-213M
$-17M
2022
$644M
$5M
$603M
$-274M
$-189M
2023
$549M
$-50M
$2B
$-109M
$93M
2024
$616M
$2B
$2B
$291M
$306M
2025
$2B
$602M
$608M
Euronet Worldwide, … (EEFT)Block, Inc. (XYZ)Corpay, Inc. (CPAY)Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)Toast, Inc. (TOST)

Euronet Worldwide, Inc. generated $616M FCF in 2024 (+96% vs 2021). Block, Inc. generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+346% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

EEFT vs XYZ vs CPAY vs AFRM vs TOST: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EEFT or XYZ or CPAY or AFRM or TOST a better buy right now?

Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) offers the better valuation at 10.8x trailing P/E (6.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EEFT or XYZ or CPAY or AFRM or TOST?

On trailing P/E, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) is the cheapest at 10.8x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 313.2x. On forward P/E, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6.4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Block, Inc. wins at 0.52x versus Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s 14.56x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EEFT or XYZ or CPAY or AFRM or TOST?

Over the past 5 years, Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) delivered a total return of +15.1%, compared to -73.6% for Block, Inc. (XYZ). A $10,000 investment in CPAY five years ago would be worth approximately $12K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XYZ returned +510.2% versus TOST's -56.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EEFT or XYZ or CPAY or AFRM or TOST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.09β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s 2.41β — meaning AFRM is approximately 121% more volatile than EEFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Toast, Inc. (TOST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — EEFT or XYZ or CPAY or AFRM or TOST?

Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) is the more profitable company, earning 25.3% net margin versus 1.6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPAY leads at 45.0% versus -2.7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPAY leads at 78.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is EEFT or XYZ or CPAY or AFRM or TOST more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Block, Inc. (XYZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.52x versus Euronet Worldwide, Inc.'s 14.56x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) trades at 6.4x forward P/E versus 43.6x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 37.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AFRM: 79.7% to $84.40.

07

Which pays a better dividend — EEFT or XYZ or CPAY or AFRM or TOST?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is EEFT or XYZ or CPAY or AFRM or TOST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.09)). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2.41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EEFT: +6.1%, AFRM: -51.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between EEFT and XYZ and CPAY and AFRM and TOST?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: EEFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; XYZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CPAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AFRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TOST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

📊
Stocks Like

EEFT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
📊
Stocks Like

XYZ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
💎
Stocks Like

CPAY

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
📊
Stocks Like

AFRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TOST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat EEFT and XYZ and CPAY and AFRM and TOST on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(EEFT: 4.2% · XYZ: 3.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(EEFT: 7.3% · XYZ: 5.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(EEFT: 10.8x · XYZ: 30.3x)