Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Equinor ASA (EQNR) vs Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EQNR | 3.6% revenue growth vs SLNG's 0.2% |
| Value | EQNR | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 22.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | EQNR | 4.7% net margin vs SLNG's 1.4% |
| Stability / Safety | SLNG | Beta 0.40 vs EQNR's 0.49, lower leverage |
| Dividends | EQNR | 6.2% yield; SLNG pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | EQNR | +33.0% vs SLNG's +3.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EQNR | 3.8% ROA vs SLNG's 1.2%, ROIC 30.7% vs 3.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Equinor is a Norwegian integrated energy company that explores for, produces, refines, and markets oil and natural gas while expanding into renewable energy. It generates most revenue from oil and gas production—primarily from Norwegian continental shelf operations—with additional income from refining, marketing, and emerging renewables like offshore wind. The company's key advantage is its dominant position in Norway's prolific oil and gas fields, combined with government backing and decades of expertise in harsh offshore environments.
Stabilis Solutions is a small-scale liquefied natural gas provider that produces, distributes, and fuels LNG for industrial and energy customers across North America. It generates revenue primarily through LNG sales to industrial, midstream, and oilfield sectors—roughly 80% of its business—with the remainder from power delivery services including electrical construction and equipment rentals. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated small-scale LNG infrastructure—from production to last-mile delivery—serving niche markets that larger LNG players typically overlook.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
EQNR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
EQNR is the larger business by revenue, generating $106.2B annually — 1468.9x SLNG's $72M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.7% (EQNR) to 1.4% (SLNG). On growth, SLNG holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | SLNGStabilis Solution… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $106.2B | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37.2B | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.0B | $1M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.0B | $8,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +19.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +0.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.8% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, EQNR trades at a 32% valuation discount to SLNG's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EQNR's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLNG's 10.0x.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | SLNGStabilis Solution… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74.5B | $105M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102.9B | $105M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.30x | 22.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.35x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.77x | 10.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.92x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.42x | 23.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EQNR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $2 for SLNG. SLNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EQNR's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLNG scores 7/9 vs EQNR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | SLNGStabilis Solution… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +1.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +30.7% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.8% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.83x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28.4B | $356,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33.4B | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.46x | 6.71x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in EQNR five years ago would be worth $21,062 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,961 for SLNG. Over the past 12 months, EQNR leads with a +33.0% total return vs SLNG's +3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLNG at 13.9% vs EQNR's 7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | SLNGStabilis Solution… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.6% | +23.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.0% | +3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.0% | +47.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.6% | +9.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.4% | -72.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.1% | +13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EQNR's 0.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQNR currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs SLNG's 88.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | SLNGStabilis Solution… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.93 | $6.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.41 | $3.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +88.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 9K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EQNR as "Hold" and SLNG as "Buy". EQNR is the only dividend payer here at 6.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | SLNGStabilis Solution… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $82.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.85 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.0% | +0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | 100 | 166.88 | +66.9% |
| Stabilis Solutions,… (SLNG) | 100 | 145.64 | +45.6% |
Equinor ASA (EQNR) returned +111% over 5 years vs Stabilis Solutions,… (SLNG)'s +10%. A $10,000 investment in EQNR 5 years ago would be worth $21,062 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | $45.7B | $106.2B | +132.4% |
| Stabilis Solutions,… (SLNG) | $38M | $73M | +93.8% |
Equinor ASA's revenue grew from $45.7B (2016) to $106.2B (2025) — a 9.8% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | -6.4% | 4.8% | +174.5% |
| Stabilis Solutions,… (SLNG) | -18.7% | 6.3% | +133.6% |
Equinor ASA's net margin went from -6% (2016) to 5% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | 15.3 | 12.1 | -20.9% |
Equinor ASA has traded in a 4x–36x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | -0.91 | 1.95 | +314.3% |
| Stabilis Solutions,… (SLNG) | -7.12 | 0.25 | +103.5% |
Equinor ASA's EPS grew from $-0.91 (2016) to $1.95 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Equinor ASA generated $6B FCF in 2025 (-71% vs 2021). Stabilis Solutions, Inc. generated $5M FCF in 2024 (+237% vs 2021).
EQNR vs SLNG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQNR or SLNG a better buy right now?
Equinor ASA (EQNR) offers the better valuation at 15.3x trailing P/E (11.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQNR or SLNG?
On trailing P/E, Equinor ASA (EQNR) is the cheapest at 15.3x versus Stabilis Solutions, Inc. at 22.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQNR or SLNG?
Over the past 5 years, Equinor ASA (EQNR) delivered a total return of +110.6%, compared to +9.6% for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). A $10,000 investment in EQNR five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EQNR returned +209.4% versus SLNG's -72.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQNR or SLNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.40β versus Equinor ASA's 0.49β — meaning EQNR is approximately 24% more volatile than SLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 83% for Equinor ASA — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — EQNR or SLNG?
Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) is the more profitable company, earning 6.3% net margin versus 4.8% for Equinor ASA — meaning it keeps 6.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQNR leads at 25.7% versus 4.6% for SLNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EQNR leads at 26.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EQNR or SLNG?
In this comparison, EQNR (6.2% yield) pays a dividend. SLNG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is EQNR or SLNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equinor ASA (EQNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.49), 6.2% yield, +209.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EQNR: +209.4%, SLNG: -72.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EQNR and SLNG?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: EQNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SLNG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EQNR pays a dividend while SLNG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.