Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) vs Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MSN | 18.9% revenue growth vs FEBO's 11.9% |
| Quality / Margins | FEBO | -0.9% net margin vs MSN's -79.0% |
| Stability / Safety | MSN | Lower D/E ratio (2.2% vs 57.8%) |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FEBO | -6.2% vs MSN's -8.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FEBO | -1.3% ROA vs MSN's -26.0%, ROIC -7.7% vs -30.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fenbo Holdings is a manufacturer of personal care electric appliances — primarily hair styling tools like curling wands, straighteners, and hair dryers — along with some toy products. It generates revenue through direct sales of its manufactured products to customers across global markets including Europe, North America, and Asia. The company benefits from established manufacturing expertise and a diversified geographic customer base that reduces regional market dependence.
Emerson Radio is a consumer electronics company that designs, sources, and markets houseware and audio products under its brand name. It generates revenue primarily from selling microwave ovens, compact refrigerators, and audio products through mass merchandisers and online marketplaces — supplemented by trademark licensing fees. The company's main advantage is its established Emerson brand recognition, which has been trusted in American households for over a century.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FEBO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). MSN leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FEBO is the larger business by revenue, generating $148M annually — 22.4x MSN's $7M. FEBO is the more profitable business, keeping -0.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSN's -79.0%. On growth, FEBO holds the edge at -47.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | MSNEmerson Radio Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $148M | $7M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $550,285 | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +2.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | -88.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | -79.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | -47.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.9% | -52.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.2% | -32.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | MSNEmerson Radio Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $9M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.88x | -1.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 0.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.00x | 0.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FEBO delivers a -0.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-28 for MSN. MSN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FEBO's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FEBO scores 5/9 vs MSN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | MSNEmerson Radio Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | -28.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | -26.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.7% | -30.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.0% | -23.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$723,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $463,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.00x | -623.89x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MSN five years ago would be worth $2,709 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,387 for FEBO. Over the past 12 months, FEBO leads with a -6.2% total return vs MSN's -8.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSN at -8.7% vs FEBO's -38.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | MSNEmerson Radio Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.4% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.2% | -8.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.1% | -23.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.1% | -72.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.1% | -54.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.0% | -8.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FEBO is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MSN's 0.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FEBO currently trades 71.1% from its 52-week high vs MSN's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | MSNEmerson Radio Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.07x | 0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.49 | $0.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $0.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.1% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.8 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 79K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FEBOFenbo Holdings Li… | MSNEmerson Radio Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 23 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) | 100 | 24.1 | -75.9% |
| Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) | 100 | 67.25 | -32.8% |
Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) returned -73% over 5 years vs Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO)'s -76%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) | $144M | $133M | -7.7% |
| Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) | $46M | $11M | -76.4% |
Emerson Radio Corp.'s revenue grew from $46M (2016) to $11M (2025) — a -14.8% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) | 3.0% | -11.6% | -487.6% |
| Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) | -2.1% | -43.9% | -1973.3% |
Emerson Radio Corp.'s net margin went from -2% (2016) to -44% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) | 0.06 | -1.41 | -2626.9% |
| Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) | -0.04 | -0.22 | -516.2% |
Emerson Radio Corp.'s EPS grew from $-0.04 (2016) to $-0.22 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares generated $-22M FCF in 2024 (-468% vs 2021). Emerson Radio Corp. generated $-4M FCF in 2025 (+11% vs 2021).
FEBO vs MSN: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — FEBO or MSN?
Over the past 5 years, Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) delivered a total return of -72.9%, compared to -76.1% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO). A $10,000 investment in MSN five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSN returned -54.4% versus FEBO's -76.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — FEBO or MSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.07β versus Emerson Radio Corp.'s 0.17β — meaning MSN is approximately -339% more volatile than FEBO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Emerson Radio Corp. (MSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 58% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which has better profit margins — FEBO or MSN?
Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) is the more profitable company, earning -11.6% net margin versus -43.9% for Emerson Radio Corp. — meaning it keeps -11.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FEBO leads at -10.4% versus -52.1% for MSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FEBO leads at 18.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — FEBO or MSN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is FEBO or MSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.07)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FEBO: -76.1%, MSN: -54.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between FEBO and MSN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.