Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) vs The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FENG | 1.7% revenue growth vs AREN's -12.3% |
| Value | FENG | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 3.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | AREN | 88.5% net margin vs FENG's -6.4% |
| Stability / Safety | FENG | Beta 0.54 vs AREN's 0.87 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AREN | +79.5% vs FENG's -22.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AREN | 104.2% ROA vs FENG's -3.0%, ROIC 22.6% vs -7.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Phoenix New Media operates a Chinese digital media platform that delivers news, video, and entertainment content across web and mobile channels. It generates revenue primarily from online advertising services (roughly 70-80% of total) supplemented by paid services including mobile content subscriptions and digital reading applications. The company's competitive advantage lies in its established Phoenix TV brand recognition and its comprehensive content ecosystem spanning news, finance, and entertainment verticals.
The Arena Group Holdings operates a digital media platform that publishes and distributes content across sports, lifestyle, and news verticals. It generates revenue primarily through digital advertising — including display, video, and native ads — supplemented by subscription fees and content licensing. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary publishing platform that enables efficient content creation and distribution across multiple brands and channels.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FENG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AREN leads in 2 (Financial Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FENG is the larger business by revenue, generating $761M annually — 5.3x AREN's $143M. AREN is the more profitable business, keeping 88.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FENG's -6.4%. On growth, FENG holds the edge at +22.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | ARENThe Arena Group H… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $761M | $143M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$43M | $50M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +52.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +30.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +88.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.3% | -11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.0% | +27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | ARENThe Arena Group H… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $552M | $137M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $472M | $257M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.68x | -1.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.24x | 3.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.38x | 1.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.13x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FENG scores 6/9 vs AREN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | ARENThe Arena Group H… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | +104.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.7% | +22.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$551M | $119M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $608M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $57M | $124M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.70x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AREN five years ago would be worth $1,642 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,593 for FENG. Over the past 12 months, AREN leads with a +79.5% total return vs FENG's -22.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FENG at -7.0% vs AREN's -28.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | ARENThe Arena Group H… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.8% | -26.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.7% | +79.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.4% | -63.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.1% | -83.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.0% | -17.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.0% | -28.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FENG is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AREN's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FENG currently trades 47.7% from its 52-week high vs AREN's 28.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | ARENThe Arena Group H… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $10.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.28 | $1.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.7% | +28.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 34.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 62K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FENG as "Buy" and AREN as "Buy".
| Metric | FENGPhoenix New Media… | ARENThe Arena Group H… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | 100 | 16.85 | -83.1% |
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | 100 | 21.89 | -78.1% |
The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) returned -84% over 5 years vs Phoenix New Media L… (FENG)'s -84%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | $1.6B | $704M | -56.3% |
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | $0.00 | $126M | — |
Phoenix New Media Limited's revenue grew from $1.6B (2015) to $704M (2024) — a -8.8% CAGR. The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $0M (2015) to $126M (2024) — a 0.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | 4.6% | -7.6% | -266.4% |
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | -81.6% | -80.0% | +2.0% |
Phoenix New Media Limited's net margin went from 5% (2015) to -8% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | 14.1 | 0.2 | -98.6% |
Phoenix New Media Limited has traded in a 0x–14x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-3x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix New Media L… (FENG) | 5.76 | -4.46 | -177.4% |
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | -0.47 | -2.85 | -506.4% |
Phoenix New Media Limited's EPS grew from $5.76 (2015) to $-4.46 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR. The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.47 (2015) to $-2.85 (2024).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Phoenix New Media Limited generated $-50M FCF in 2024 (+69% vs 2021). The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. generated $-21M FCF in 2024 (-7% vs 2021).
FENG vs AREN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FENG or AREN a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FENG or AREN?
Over the past 5 years, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) delivered a total return of -83.6%, compared to -84.1% for Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG). A $10,000 investment in AREN five years ago would be worth approximately $2K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AREN returned -17.9% versus FENG's -50.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FENG or AREN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.54β versus The Arena Group Holdings, Inc.'s 0.87β — meaning AREN is approximately 61% more volatile than FENG relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — FENG or AREN?
Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is the more profitable company, earning -7.6% net margin versus -80.0% for The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -7.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AREN leads at 6.2% versus -9.2% for FENG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AREN leads at 44.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is FENG or AREN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) trades at 0.2x forward P/E versus 3.5x for The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. — 3.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
06Which pays a better dividend — FENG or AREN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FENG or AREN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Phoenix New Media Limited (FENG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.54)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FENG: -50.0%, AREN: -17.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FENG and AREN?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 11%
- Gross Margin > 27%