Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) vs AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AXIA | 0.2% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1% |
| Quality / Margins | AXIA | -1.8% net margin vs FLNC's -2.0% |
| Stability / Safety | AXIA | Lower D/E ratio (64.1% vs 71.2%) |
| Dividends | AXIA | 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; FLNC pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FLNC | +171.7% vs AXIA's +26.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AXIA | -0.2% ROA vs FLNC's -2.3%, ROIC 1.2% vs -12.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fluence Energy is a global provider of energy storage systems and AI-powered digital applications for renewable energy integration. It generates revenue primarily through selling battery storage hardware (Gridstack, Sunstack, Edgestack) and providing related services like engineering, maintenance, and energy storage-as-a-service contracts. The company benefits from its joint venture ownership by Siemens and AES Corporation — which provides deep industry expertise, global scale, and established customer relationships in the utility sector.
AXIA Energia is a Brazilian electric utility that generates, transmits, and sells electricity across Brazil. It earns revenue primarily from electricity sales to distributors and large consumers — with generation contributing roughly 70% and transmission about 30% of total revenue. The company's key advantage is its massive hydroelectric portfolio — Brazil's largest — which provides low-cost, renewable baseload power and significant operational scale.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AXIA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FLNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AXIA is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.1B annually — 10.2x FLNC's $2.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -1.8% (AXIA) to -2.0% (FLNC). On growth, FLNC holds the edge at +154.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $26.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $5.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$52M | -$479M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$195M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +50.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +6.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +154.4% | -83.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -114.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $800M | $23.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $500M | $33.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -42.00x | 74.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 52.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 16.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.69x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 178.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AXIA delivers a -0.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-11 for FLNC. AXIA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNC's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AXIA scores 6/9 vs FLNC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | -0.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.0% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | +1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$300M | $51.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $691M | $26.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $391M | $78.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.49x | 1.41x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AXIA five years ago would be worth $13,122 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,440 for FLNC. Over the past 12 months, FLNC leads with a +171.7% total return vs AXIA's +26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXIA at 8.7% vs FLNC's -5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.5% | +30.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +171.7% | +26.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.8% | +28.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | +31.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | -92.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.9% | +8.7% |
Risk & Volatility
AXIA currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs FLNC's 46.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | — |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.51 | $12.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.46 | $7.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.4% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.9 | 67.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.9M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLNC as "Hold" and AXIA as "Buy". AXIA is the only dividend payer here at 0.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.08 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | $92M | $2.3B | +2355.6% |
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | $9.7B | $7.5B | -23.5% |
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | -51.0% | -2.1% | +95.8% |
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | 10.1% | 25.8% | +156.1% |
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | 6.5 | 20.7 | +218.5% |
AXIA Energia S.A. has traded in a 7x–26x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~74x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | -0.95 | -0.37 | +61.1% |
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | 0.72 | 0.84 | +16.7% |
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fluence Energy, Inc. generated $-175M FCF in 2025 (+39% vs 2021). AXIA Energia S.A. generated $691M FCF in 2024 (-53% vs 2021).
FLNC vs AXIA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLNC or AXIA a better buy right now?
AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) offers the better valuation at 74.2x trailing P/E (1.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLNC or AXIA?
Over the past 5 years, AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) delivered a total return of +31.2%, compared to -55.6% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). A $10,000 investment in AXIA five years ago would be worth approximately $13K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLNC returned -55.6% versus AXIA's -92.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLNC or AXIA?
On balance sheet safety, AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 71% for Fluence Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — FLNC or AXIA?
AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) is the more profitable company, earning 25.8% net margin versus -2.1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AXIA leads at 34.5% versus -1.5% for FLNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXIA leads at 44.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — FLNC or AXIA?
In this comparison, AXIA (0.2% yield) pays a dividend. FLNC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is FLNC or AXIA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLNC: -55.6%, AXIA: -92.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between FLNC and AXIA?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.