Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) vs Solventum Corporation (SOLV) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FMS | 1.5% revenue growth vs SOLV's 0.9% |
| Value | FMS | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 11.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | SOLV | 18.7% net margin vs FMS's 5.0% |
| Stability / Safety | FMS | Beta 0.40 vs SOLV's 0.97, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FMS | +0.2% vs SOLV's -7.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SOLV | 10.9% ROA vs FMS's 3.2%, ROIC 16.9% vs 5.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fresenius Medical Care is a global leader in dialysis care and products for patients with chronic kidney failure. It generates revenue through two main segments: dialysis services (about 75% of revenue) from its network of outpatient clinics and hospital contracts, and dialysis products (about 25%) including machines, dialyzers, and related supplies. The company's key advantage is its vertically integrated model—combining clinics, products, and services—which creates patient stickiness and economies of scale in the capital-intensive dialysis industry.
Solventum is a healthcare company that develops, manufactures, and commercializes medical solutions across four main segments. It generates revenue primarily from medical surgical supplies (~40% of sales), dental products (~25%), health information systems software (~20%), and purification/filtration technologies (~15%). The company benefits from its established brand recognition and comprehensive product portfolio—spanning from wound care to dental orthodontics—which creates switching costs for healthcare providers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FMS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). SOLV leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.6B annually — 2.4x SOLV's $8.3B. SOLV is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FMS's 5.0%. On growth, FMS holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FMSFresenius Medical… | SOLVSolventum Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.6B | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.3B | $2.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $978M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | -$9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +53.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +26.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +18.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.3% | -3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.5% | +105.6% |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, SOLV trades at a 29% valuation discount to FMS's 11.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FMS's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOLV's 7.8x.
| Metric | FMSFresenius Medical… | SOLVSolventum Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.6B | $12.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.4B | $17.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.84x | 8.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.89x | 11.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.33x | 7.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SOLV delivers a 30.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $7 for FMS. FMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SOLV's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SOLV scores 6/9 vs FMS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FMSFresenius Medical… | SOLVSolventum Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | +30.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +10.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.2B | $4.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $878M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.8B | $5.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.84x | 5.62x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SOLV five years ago would be worth $9,275 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,718 for FMS. Over the past 12 months, FMS leads with a +0.2% total return vs SOLV's -7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FMS at 9.1% vs SOLV's -2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FMSFresenius Medical… | SOLVSolventum Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | -6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.2% | -7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.7% | -7.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.8% | -7.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.5% | -7.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.1% | -2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
FMS is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOLV's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOLV currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs FMS's 77.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FMSFresenius Medical… | SOLVSolventum Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.40x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.46 | $88.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.95 | $60.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 518K | 788K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FMS as "Hold" and SOLV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.1% upside for SOLV (target: $96) vs 19.4% for FMS (target: $28).
| Metric | FMSFresenius Medical… | SOLVSolventum Corpora… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $95.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 100 | 118.39 | +18.4% |
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | 86.37 | 96.14 | +11.3% |
Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) returned -7% over 5 years vs Fresenius Medical C… (FMS)'s -23%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | $17.0B | $19.6B | +15.3% |
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | $8.2B | $8.3B | +1.9% |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's revenue grew from $17.0B (2016) to $19.6B (2025) — a 1.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 6.9% | 5.0% | -28.2% |
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | 17.9% | 18.7% | +4.6% |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's net margin went from 7% (2016) to 5% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 25.3 | 14.2 | -43.9% |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA has traded in a 10x–39x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~12x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 1.87 | 1.68 | -10.2% |
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | 8.47 | 8.88 | +4.8% |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's EPS grew from $1.87 (2016) to $1.68 (2025) — a -1% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021). Solventum Corporation generated $-10M FCF in 2025 (-101% vs 2021).
FMS vs SOLV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMS or SOLV a better buy right now?
Solventum Corporation (SOLV) offers the better valuation at 8.4x trailing P/E (11.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solventum Corporation (SOLV) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMS or SOLV?
On trailing P/E, Solventum Corporation (SOLV) is the cheapest at 8.4x versus Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA at 11.8x. On forward P/E, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA is actually cheaper at 9.9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMS or SOLV?
Over the past 5 years, Solventum Corporation (SOLV) delivered a total return of -7.3%, compared to -22.8% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS). A $10,000 investment in SOLV five years ago would be worth approximately $9K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOLV returned -7.2% versus FMS's -28.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMS or SOLV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.40β versus Solventum Corporation's 0.97β — meaning SOLV is approximately 141% more volatile than FMS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 100% for Solventum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FMS or SOLV?
Solventum Corporation (SOLV) is the more profitable company, earning 18.7% net margin versus 5.0% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA — meaning it keeps 18.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOLV leads at 26.2% versus 9.3% for FMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOLV leads at 53.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FMS or SOLV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) trades at 9.9x forward P/E versus 11.5x for Solventum Corporation — 1.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOLV: 29.1% to $95.80.
07Which pays a better dividend — FMS or SOLV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FMS or SOLV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.40)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FMS: -28.5%, SOLV: -7.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FMS and SOLV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.