Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) vs Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FND | 5.1% revenue growth vs TTSH's -3.0% |
| Value | TTSH | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 33.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | FND | 4.7% net margin vs TTSH's -1.3% |
| Stability / Safety | TTSH | Beta 0.80 vs FND's 1.30 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FND | -28.5% vs TTSH's -55.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FND | 3.9% ROA vs TTSH's -1.5%, ROIC 5.3% vs -1.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Floor & Decor is a specialty retailer operating warehouse-format stores that sell hard surface flooring — tile, wood, laminate, vinyl, and natural stone — along with installation accessories to both professional contractors and do-it-yourself homeowners. It generates revenue primarily through in-store sales (roughly 90% of total) with the remainder from e-commerce, serving a mix of professional installers, commercial businesses, and retail customers. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large-format, low-cost warehouse model that offers extensive in-stock selection at value prices — a difficult-to-replicate physical footprint and supply chain.
Tile Shop is a specialty retailer of natural stone and man-made tiles along with installation materials and accessories for residential and commercial projects. It generates revenue primarily from tile sales—including marble, travertine, porcelain, and ceramic—which account for the bulk of sales, supplemented by setting materials, tools, and delivery services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized expertise, curated product selection, and physical store footprint that provides hands-on customer service and design consultation.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FND leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TTSH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FND is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 13.8x TTSH's $337M. FND is the more profitable business, keeping 4.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTSH's -1.3%. On growth, FND holds the edge at +5.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | TTSHTile Shop Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $337M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $524M | $18M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $217M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | +63.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | -1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | -4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | TTSHTile Shop Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $133M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $258M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.98x | -33.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.25x | 15.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 38.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 33.30x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 0.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.11x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 116.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FND delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-5 for TTSH. FND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTSH's 1.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FND scores 7/9 vs TTSH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | TTSHTile Shop Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | -2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.75x | 1.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $125M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $249M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $135M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 39.46x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FND five years ago would be worth $7,221 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,997 for TTSH. Over the past 12 months, FND leads with a -28.5% total return vs TTSH's -55.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FND at -9.0% vs TTSH's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | TTSHTile Shop Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.7% | -8.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.5% | -55.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.7% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.8% | -40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.6% | -63.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.0% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TTSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FND's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FND currently trades 70.3% from its 52-week high vs TTSH's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | TTSHTile Shop Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $98.24 | $7.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.11 | $2.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +43.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.5 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 269K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FND as "Hold" and TTSH as "Hold".
| Metric | FNDFloor & Decor Hol… | TTSHTile Shop Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $76.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 100 | 124.32 | +24.3% |
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 100 | 183.78 | +83.8% |
Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) returned -28% over 5 years vs Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH)'s -40%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | $1.1B | $4.7B | +345.8% |
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | $324M | $337M | +3.9% |
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.1B (2016) to $4.7B (2025) — a 18.1% CAGR. Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $324M (2016) to $337M (2025) — a 0.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 4.1% | 4.5% | +8.7% |
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 5.7% | -1.3% | -123.4% |
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 4% (2016) to 4% (2025). Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 6% (2016) to -1% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 47.3 | 31.7 | -33.0% |
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 45.7 | 131 | +186.7% |
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 23x–53x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x. Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 14x–131x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~-34x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 0.44 | 1.92 | +336.4% |
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 0.36 | -0.1 | -127.8% |
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.44 (2016) to $1.92 (2025) — a 18% CAGR. Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.36 (2016) to $-0.10 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. generated $64M FCF in 2025 (+160% vs 2021). Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021).
FND vs TTSH: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FND or TTSH a better buy right now?
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) offers the better valuation at 36.0x trailing P/E (33.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FND or TTSH?
On forward P/E, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15.2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FND or TTSH?
Over the past 5 years, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) delivered a total return of -27.8%, compared to -40.0% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH). A $10,000 investment in FND five years ago would be worth approximately $7K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FND returned +115.6% versus TTSH's -63.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FND or TTSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.80β versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.'s 1.30β — meaning FND is approximately 63% more volatile than TTSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 75% versus 155% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FND or TTSH?
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) is the more profitable company, earning 4.5% net margin versus -1.3% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FND leads at 5.8% versus -1.7% for TTSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTSH leads at 63.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FND or TTSH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH) trades at 15.2x forward P/E versus 33.3x for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — 18.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — FND or TTSH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FND or TTSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.80)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTSH: -63.9%, FND: +115.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FND and TTSH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.