Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FTNT | 14.2% revenue growth vs ORCL's 8.4% |
| Value | FTNT | PEG 0.80 vs 2.78 |
| Quality / Margins | FTNT | 27.3% net margin vs ORCL's 25.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FTNT | Beta 1.23 vs ORCL's 1.40, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ORCL | 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; FTNT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ORCL | -11.2% vs FTNT's -26.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FTNT | 17.8% ROA vs ORCL's 7.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fortinet is a cybersecurity company that provides integrated network security solutions through hardware appliances, software, and cloud services. It generates revenue primarily from selling security hardware like firewalls (~60% of product revenue) and software subscriptions/services (~40% of total revenue) including support, cloud security, and software-as-a-service offerings. The company's key advantage is its Security Fabric architecture—a unified platform approach that integrates various security functions across networks, endpoints, and clouds, creating switching costs and operational efficiencies for customers.
Oracle is a global enterprise software and cloud computing company that provides database management systems, enterprise applications, and cloud infrastructure services. It generates revenue primarily through cloud services and license support (~70% of total revenue) and cloud license and on-premise license sales (~20%), with hardware and services making up the remainder. The company's key moat is its entrenched position in enterprise database software—particularly with its flagship Oracle Database—which creates significant switching costs and lock-in for large corporate customers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FTNT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ORCL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.0B annually — 9.0x FTNT's $6.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 27.3% (FTNT) to 25.3% (ORCL).
| Metric | FTNTFortinet, Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $61.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $22.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $15.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | -$13.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.8% | +70.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +30.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +25.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | -21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.8% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +90.9% |
Valuation Metrics
At 32.5x trailing earnings, FTNT trades at a 3% valuation discount to ORCL's 33.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FTNT offers better value at 0.98x vs ORCL's 4.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | FTNTFortinet, Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $58.8B | $408.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $57.3B | $501.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.52x | 33.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.56x | 19.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.98x | 4.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.64x | 21.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.64x | 7.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 47.77x | 19.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.40x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTNT delivers a 149.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $51 for ORCL. FTNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.81x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTNT scores 7/9 vs ORCL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FTNTFortinet, Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +149.8% | +50.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.8% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.7% | +14.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 4.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.5B | $93.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.5B | $10.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $996M | $104.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 112.99x | 3.24x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $23,146 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,808 for FTNT. Over the past 12 months, ORCL leads with a -11.2% total return vs FTNT's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORCL at 19.9% vs FTNT's 10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FTNTFortinet, Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | -25.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.8% | -11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | +72.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.1% | +131.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1291.4% | +327.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.0% | +19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FTNT is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FTNT currently trades 71.4% from its 52-week high vs ORCL's 42.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FTNTFortinet, Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $110.67 | $345.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.12 | $118.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.4% | +42.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 20.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FTNT as "Hold" and ORCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 103.5% upside for ORCL (target: $296) vs 8.5% for FTNT (target: $86). ORCL is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FTNTFortinet, Inc. | ORCLOracle Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.71 | $295.85 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 67 | 86 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) | 100 | 369.16 | +269.2% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 314.46 | +214.5% |
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) returned +131% over 5 years vs Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT)'s +128%. A $10,000 investment in ORCL 5 years ago would be worth $23,146 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) | $1.3B | $6.8B | +433.1% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | $37.0B | $57.4B | +54.9% |
Fortinet, Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.3B (2016) to $6.8B (2025) — a 20.4% CAGR. Oracle Corporation's revenue grew from $37.0B (2016) to $57.4B (2025) — a 5.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) | 2.5% | 27.3% | +979.6% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 24.0% | 21.7% | -9.8% |
Fortinet, Inc.'s net margin went from 3% (2016) to 27% (2025). Oracle Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2016) to 22% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) | 242.8 | 32.7 | -86.5% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 21.4 | 44.9 | +109.8% |
Fortinet, Inc. has traded in a 33x–243x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~33x. Oracle Corporation has traded in a 18x–53x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~34x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) | 0.04 | 2.43 | +6650.0% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 2.07 | 4.34 | +109.7% |
Fortinet, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.04 (2016) to $2.43 (2025) — a 60% CAGR. Oracle Corporation's EPS grew from $2.07 (2016) to $4.34 (2025) — a 9% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fortinet, Inc. generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+85% vs 2021). Oracle Corporation generated $-394M FCF in 2025 (-103% vs 2021).
FTNT vs ORCL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTNT or ORCL a better buy right now?
Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) offers the better valuation at 32.5x trailing P/E (26.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Oracle Corporation (ORCL) a "Buy" — based on 86 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTNT or ORCL?
On trailing P/E, Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) is the cheapest at 32.5x versus Oracle Corporation at 33.5x. On forward P/E, Oracle Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fortinet, Inc. wins at 0.80x versus Oracle Corporation's 2.78x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTNT or ORCL?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +131.5%, compared to +128.1% for Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth approximately $23K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTNT returned +1291% versus ORCL's +327.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTNT or ORCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.23β versus Oracle Corporation's 1.40β — meaning ORCL is approximately 14% more volatile than FTNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 81% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FTNT or ORCL?
Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) is the more profitable company, earning 27.3% net margin versus 21.7% for Oracle Corporation — meaning it keeps 27.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30.8% versus 30.6% for FTNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTNT leads at 80.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FTNT or ORCL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.80x versus Oracle Corporation's 2.78x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) trades at 19.7x forward P/E versus 26.6x for Fortinet, Inc. — 6.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ORCL: 103.5% to $295.85.
07Which pays a better dividend — FTNT or ORCL?
In this comparison, ORCL (1.1% yield) pays a dividend. FTNT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FTNT or ORCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.23), +1291% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FTNT: +1291%, ORCL: +327.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FTNT and ORCL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. ORCL pays a dividend while FTNT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.