Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) vs Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BATRA | 10.5% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1% |
| Quality / Margins | BATRA | -3.2% net margin vs HOFV's -366.2% |
| Stability / Safety | HOFV | Beta 0.23 vs BATRA's 0.48 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BATRA | +9.7% vs HOFV's -62.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BATRA | -1.4% ROA vs HOFV's -17.6%, ROIC 1.0% vs -6.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company operates a destination resort and entertainment complex anchored by the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio. It generates revenue through hotel operations, event hosting, media production, and retail sales — with the Hall of Fame museum serving as the primary attraction. The company's exclusive licensing rights to the Pro Football Hall of Fame brand and its physical location create a unique, defensible position in sports tourism.
Atlanta Braves Holdings is a professional sports franchise that owns and operates the Atlanta Braves Major League Baseball team and its surrounding real estate development. The company generates revenue primarily from baseball operations — including ticket sales, media rights, and sponsorships — and from The Battery Atlanta mixed-use development, which includes retail, dining, and entertainment venues. Its key competitive advantage is the unique combination of a historic MLB franchise with a successful real estate ecosystem that creates multiple revenue streams beyond traditional sports operations.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
BATRA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HOFV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
BATRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $732M annually — 42.8x HOFV's $17M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -3.2% (BATRA) to -3.7% (HOFV). On growth, BATRA holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $732M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.0% | +19.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -158.0% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | -3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.5% | -16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | -109.7% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $251M | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -130.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 3.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 5.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BATRA delivers a -4.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOFV. BATRA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOFV's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATRA scores 4/9 vs HOFV's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.6% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.45x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $249M | $726M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $432,174 | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $249M | $837M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.04x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in BATRA five years ago would be worth $16,198 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $69 for HOFV. Over the past 12 months, BATRA leads with a +9.7% total return vs HOFV's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BATRA at 12.2% vs HOFV's -67.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.0% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | +41.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +62.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +143.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.2% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
HOFV is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BATRA's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BATRA currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs HOFV's 33.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.04 | $50.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.24 | $38.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.7% | +95.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 72.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 53K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Jan 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | 100 | 0.15 | -99.9% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | 100 | 164.56 | +64.6% |
Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) returned +62% over 5 years vs Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV)'s -99%. A $10,000 investment in BATRA 5 years ago would be worth $16,198 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | $6M | $21M | +269.8% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | $262M | $732M | +179.6% |
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $262M (2016) to $732M (2025) — a 12.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | -170.8% | -2.6% | +98.5% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | -23.7% | -3.2% | +86.5% |
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from -24% (2016) to -3% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | -2.64 | -8.72 | -230.4% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | -1.25 | -0.37 | +70.4% |
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.25 (2016) to $-0.37 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company generated $-27M FCF in 2024 (+70% vs 2021). Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. generated $-120M FCF in 2025 (-544% vs 2021).
HOFV vs BATRA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOFV or BATRA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HOFV or BATRA?
Over the past 5 years, Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) delivered a total return of +62.0%, compared to -99.3% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). A $10,000 investment in BATRA five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BATRA returned +143.9% versus HOFV's -99.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HOFV or BATRA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.23β versus Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s 0.48β — meaning BATRA is approximately 113% more volatile than HOFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 156% versus 3% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — HOFV or BATRA?
Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) is the more profitable company, earning -3.2% net margin versus -263.4% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — meaning it keeps -3.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BATRA leads at 2.3% versus -139.9% for HOFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOFV leads at 71.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — HOFV or BATRA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is HOFV or BATRA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.23)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFV: -99.8%, BATRA: +143.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between HOFV and BATRA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.