Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) vs Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WBD | -4.8% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1% |
| Quality / Margins | WBD | 1.3% net margin vs HOFV's -366.2% |
| Stability / Safety | HOFV | Beta 0.23 vs WBD's 1.73 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WBD | +145.8% vs HOFV's -62.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WBD | 0.5% ROA vs HOFV's -17.6%, ROIC -9.7% vs -6.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company operates a destination resort and entertainment complex anchored by the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio. It generates revenue through hotel operations, event hosting, media production, and retail sales — with the Hall of Fame museum serving as the primary attraction. The company's exclusive licensing rights to the Pro Football Hall of Fame brand and its physical location create a unique, defensible position in sports tourism.
Warner Bros. Discovery is a global media and entertainment conglomerate that produces and distributes content across film, television, and streaming platforms. It generates revenue primarily through three segments: Studios (film and TV production), Networks (cable and broadcast channels), and Direct-to-Consumer (streaming services like Max and discovery+). The company's key advantage is its massive content library and iconic franchises — including DC, Harry Potter, HBO originals, and Discovery's unscripted programming — which create a deep moat in an increasingly competitive streaming landscape.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WBD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HOFV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.9B annually — 2213.5x HOFV's $17M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.3% (WBD) to -3.7% (HOFV). On growth, WBD holds the edge at -6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | WBDWarner Bros. Disc… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $37.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $16.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.0% | +44.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -158.0% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.5% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | -6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | WBDWarner Bros. Disc… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $76.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $251M | $110.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -6.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WBD delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOFV. WBD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOFV's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBD scores 4/9 vs HOFV's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | WBDWarner Bros. Disc… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.6% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | -9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | -10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.45x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $249M | $34.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $432,174 | $5.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $249M | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.04x | 1.85x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WBD five years ago would be worth $4,842 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $69 for HOFV. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +145.8% total return vs HOFV's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 21.7% vs HOFV's -67.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | WBDWarner Bros. Disc… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.0% | +145.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | +80.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -51.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +12.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.2% | +21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
HOFV is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs HOFV's 33.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | WBDWarner Bros. Disc… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.04 | $30.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.24 | $7.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.7% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 20.9M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | WBDWarner Bros. Disc… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.59 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Jan 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | 100 | 0.15 | -99.9% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 108.65 | +8.7% |
Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) returned -52% over 5 years vs Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV)'s -99%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | $6M | $21M | +269.8% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | $6.4B | $39.3B | +515.0% |
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.'s revenue grew from $6.4B (2015) to $39.3B (2024) — a 22.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | -170.8% | -2.6% | +98.5% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 16.2% | -28.8% | -277.9% |
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.'s net margin went from 16% (2015) to -29% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2021 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 28.8 | 15.3 | -46.9% |
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. has traded in a 11x–29x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~-6x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | -2.64 | -8.72 | -230.4% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 1.58 | -4.62 | -392.4% |
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.58 (2015) to $-4.62 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company generated $-27M FCF in 2024 (+70% vs 2021). Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. generated $4B FCF in 2024 (+83% vs 2021).
HOFV vs WBD: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOFV or WBD a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HOFV or WBD?
Over the past 5 years, Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) delivered a total return of -51.6%, compared to -99.3% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). A $10,000 investment in WBD five years ago would be worth approximately $5K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WBD returned +12.7% versus HOFV's -99.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HOFV or WBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.23β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.'s 1.73β — meaning WBD is approximately 661% more volatile than HOFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 113% versus 3% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — HOFV or WBD?
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) is the more profitable company, earning -28.8% net margin versus -263.4% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — meaning it keeps -28.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WBD leads at -25.5% versus -139.9% for HOFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOFV leads at 71.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — HOFV or WBD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is HOFV or WBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.23)). Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) carries a higher beta of 1.73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFV: -99.8%, WBD: +12.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between HOFV and WBD?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.