Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO) vs NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NEE | 11.0% revenue growth vs HTOO's -61.3% |
| Quality / Margins | NEE | 24.9% net margin vs HTOO's -6.6% |
| Stability / Safety | NEE | Beta 0.35 vs HTOO's 0.71 |
| Dividends | NEE | 2.4% yield; 30-year raise streak; HTOO pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NEE | +37.8% vs HTOO's -75.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NEE | 3.2% ROA vs HTOO's -73.2%, ROIC 4.1% vs -96.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fusion Fuel Green is a green hydrogen technology company that develops and deploys integrated solar-to-hydrogen systems for clean energy production. It makes money through selling its proprietary hydrogen generators, supplying green hydrogen output from its own plants, and providing operational services—with project development and technology sales being its primary revenue drivers. The company's key advantage is its integrated solar-to-hydrogen technology platform that combines concentrated solar power with electrolysis in a single modular unit, offering potentially lower-cost green hydrogen production.
NextEra Energy is a major electric utility and clean energy developer that operates regulated utilities in Florida while also building renewable projects across North America. It makes money primarily through regulated utility operations — about 60% of earnings — and its competitive energy generation business that develops wind, solar, and battery storage projects. The company's key advantage is its massive scale in renewable energy development and its first-mover position in clean energy infrastructure, giving it unmatched project execution capabilities and cost advantages.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NEE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HTOO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NEE is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.5B annually — 5821.0x HTOO's $5M. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 24.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTOO's -6.6%.
| Metric | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… | NEENextEra Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $27.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $15.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | $6.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$28.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -198.6% | +62.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +30.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +24.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -103.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +21.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +25.9% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… | NEENextEra Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $195.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $288.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.80x | 28.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 7.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.92x | 2.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-11 for HTOO. HTOO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEE's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEE scores 5/9 vs HTOO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… | NEENextEra Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -73.2% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -96.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -92.6% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $92.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $214,000 | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $95.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.36x | 1.81x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NEE five years ago would be worth $13,627 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $59 for HTOO. Over the past 12 months, NEE leads with a +37.8% total return vs HTOO's -75.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEE at 12.1% vs HTOO's -70.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… | NEENextEra Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.1% | +16.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.5% | +37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +41.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +36.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +287.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.1% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTOO's 0.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs HTOO's 23.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… | NEENextEra Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.39 | $95.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.92 | $61.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.3% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 69K | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
NEE is the only dividend payer here at 2.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | HTOOFusion Fuel Green… | NEENextEra Energy, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $93.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Dec 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | 100 | 0.43 | -99.6% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 116.32 | +16.3% |
NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) returned +36% over 5 years vs Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO)'s -99%. A $10,000 investment in NEE 5 years ago would be worth $13,627 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | $0.00 | $2M | — |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | $16.1B | $27.5B | +70.3% |
NextEra Energy, Inc.'s revenue grew from $16.1B (2016) to $27.5B (2025) — a 6.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | -7.5% | -8.6% | -14.8% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 18.0% | 24.9% | +37.8% |
NextEra Energy, Inc.'s net margin went from 18% (2016) to 25% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 13.8 | 24.4 | +76.8% |
NextEra Energy, Inc. has traded in a 13x–52x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | 0.38 | -0.75 | -297.4% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 1.56 | 3.29 | +110.9% |
NextEra Energy, Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.56 (2016) to $3.29 (2025) — a 9% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fusion Fuel Green PLC generated $-7M FCF in 2024 (+88% vs 2021). NextEra Energy, Inc. generated $-12B FCF in 2025 (-101% vs 2021).
HTOO vs NEE: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTOO or NEE a better buy right now?
NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) offers the better valuation at 28.5x trailing P/E (23.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HTOO or NEE?
Over the past 5 years, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) delivered a total return of +36.3%, compared to -99.4% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO). A $10,000 investment in NEE five years ago would be worth approximately $14K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEE returned +287.2% versus HTOO's -99.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HTOO or NEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.35β versus Fusion Fuel Green PLC's 0.71β — meaning HTOO is approximately 105% more volatile than NEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 144% for NextEra Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — HTOO or NEE?
NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24.9% net margin versus -858.9% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC — meaning it keeps 24.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEE leads at 30.1% versus -1070.5% for HTOO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — HTOO or NEE?
In this comparison, NEE (2.4% yield) pays a dividend. HTOO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is HTOO or NEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.35), 2.4% yield, +287.2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEE: +287.2%, HTOO: -99.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between HTOO and NEE?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. NEE pays a dividend while HTOO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.