Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) vs CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HZO | -5.0% revenue growth vs PRTS's -12.9% |
| Quality / Margins | HZO | -1.4% net margin vs PRTS's -9.7% |
| Stability / Safety | PRTS | Beta 1.41 vs HZO's 1.68, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | HZO | +20.3% vs PRTS's -26.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HZO | -1.3% ROA vs PRTS's -27.1%, ROIC 3.8% vs -32.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
MarineMax is the largest recreational boat and yacht retailer in the United States, operating dealerships that sell new and used boats while providing related services. The company generates revenue primarily from boat sales—both new and used—which account for roughly 80% of sales, supplemented by parts/accessories, service/repair, and brokerage/charter services. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive dealership network—the largest in the industry—which provides geographic reach, brand partnerships, and service capabilities that smaller regional players cannot match.
CarParts.com is an online retailer of aftermarket auto parts and accessories serving individual consumers and repair shops. It generates revenue primarily through direct e-commerce sales — about 90% from individual consumers and 10% from wholesale to repair shops — via its network of websites and online marketplaces. The company's key advantage is its vertically integrated supply chain and proprietary technology platform that enables fast fulfillment and competitive pricing.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
HZO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PRTS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
HZO is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 4.1x PRTS's $561M. HZO is the more profitable business, keeping -1.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTS's -9.7%. On growth, HZO holds the edge at -1.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $561M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $81M | -$31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | -$54M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | -9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.9% | -11.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -123.4% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $667M | $49M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $54M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.33x | -1.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.12x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.44x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 0.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.85x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HZO delivers a -3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-85 for PRTS. PRTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HZO's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HZO scores 5/9 vs PRTS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -84.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | -27.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | -32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | -30.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $170M | $36M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $41M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.09x | -35.10x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in HZO five years ago would be worth $6,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $370 for PRTS. Over the past 12 months, HZO leads with a +20.3% total return vs PRTS's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HZO at -3.2% vs PRTS's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.7% | +42.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | -26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.2% | -88.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.4% | -96.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.9% | -74.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.2% | -51.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PRTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HZO's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HZO currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs PRTS's 52.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.60 | $1.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.85 | $0.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +52.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.9 | 70.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 334K | 827K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +1.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 100 | 182.93 | +82.9% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | 100 | 20.08 | -79.9% |
MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) returned -37% over 5 years vs CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS)'s -96%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | $942M | $2.3B | +145.1% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | $304M | $589M | +94.0% |
MarineMax, Inc.'s revenue grew from $942M (2016) to $2.3B (2025) — a 10.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 2.4% | -1.4% | -157.1% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | 0.2% | -6.9% | -2963.4% |
MarineMax, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to -1% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 19.9 | 17.5 | -12.1% |
MarineMax, Inc. has traded in a 4x–20x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~-21x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 0.91 | -1.43 | -257.1% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | -0.08 | -0.71 | -787.5% |
MarineMax, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.91 (2016) to $-1.43 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
MarineMax, Inc. generated $12M FCF in 2025 (-97% vs 2021). CarParts.com, Inc. generated $-10M FCF in 2024 (+45% vs 2021).
HZO vs PRTS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HZO or PRTS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HZO or PRTS?
Over the past 5 years, MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) delivered a total return of -37.4%, compared to -96.3% for CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS). A $10,000 investment in HZO five years ago would be worth approximately $6K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HZO returned +71.9% versus PRTS's -74.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HZO or PRTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.41β versus MarineMax, Inc.'s 1.68β — meaning HZO is approximately 19% more volatile than PRTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 131% for MarineMax, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — HZO or PRTS?
MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) is the more profitable company, earning -1.4% net margin versus -6.9% for CarParts.com, Inc. — meaning it keeps -1.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HZO leads at 4.5% versus -6.9% for PRTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRTS leads at 33.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — HZO or PRTS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is HZO or PRTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) carries a higher beta of 1.68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRTS: -74.2%, HZO: +71.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between HZO and PRTS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.