Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE) vs Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | IE | 11.8% revenue growth vs KC's 10.5% |
| Quality / Margins | KC | -10.8% net margin vs IE's -32.6% |
| Stability / Safety | KC | Beta 1.61 vs IE's 1.75 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | IE | +176.8% vs KC's -17.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KC | -3.8% ROA vs IE's -21.9%, ROIC -17.7% vs -28.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Ivanhoe Electric is a mineral exploration company that uses proprietary technology to discover critical metals like copper, gold, and silver. It generates revenue through mineral project development and sales, with additional income from its geophysical data services and vanadium flow battery technology for energy storage. The company's key advantage is its Typhoon geophysical surveying system — which provides superior subsurface imaging for mineral discovery — combined with its AI-powered data analytics platform.
Kingsoft Cloud is a Chinese cloud service provider offering public cloud infrastructure and enterprise cloud solutions to businesses across various industries. It generates revenue primarily from public cloud services — including computing, storage, and content delivery — and enterprise cloud services for specific verticals like finance and healthcare. Its competitive advantage stems from its integration with the broader Kingsoft ecosystem — including gaming and office software — which creates cross-selling opportunities and customer stickiness.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
KC leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
KC is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.0B annually — 2781.8x IE's $3M. KC is the more profitable business, keeping -10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IE's -32.6%. On growth, KC holds the edge at +33.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IEIvanhoe Electric … | KCKingsoft Cloud Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $9.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$108M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | -$971M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$94M | -$343M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -9.9% | +16.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.2% | -8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.6% | -10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.8% | -3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.7% | +33.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | +99.6% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IEIvanhoe Electric … | KCKingsoft Cloud Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $49.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $50.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.76x | -11.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 771.05x | 43.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.42x | 4.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KC delivers a -13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-25 for IE. IE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KC's 0.94x.
| Metric | IEIvanhoe Electric … | KCKingsoft Cloud Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.0% | -13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.9% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -28.1% | -17.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.8% | -20.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$139M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176M | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $37M | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.89x | -1.40x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in IE five years ago would be worth $15,917 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,210 for KC. Over the past 12 months, IE leads with a +176.8% total return vs KC's -17.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KC at 51.8% vs IE's 4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IEIvanhoe Electric … | KCKingsoft Cloud Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | +23.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +176.8% | -17.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.4% | +250.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.2% | -77.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.2% | -43.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.6% | +51.8% |
Risk & Volatility
KC is the less volatile stock with a 1.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IE's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IE currently trades 79.8% from its 52-week high vs KC's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IEIvanhoe Electric … | KCKingsoft Cloud Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.75x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.55 | $19.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.50 | $10.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.8% | +68.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IE as "Buy" and KC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.8% upside for KC (target: $18) vs -2.6% for IE (target: $17).
| Metric | IEIvanhoe Electric … | KCKingsoft Cloud Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.75 | $18.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jun 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivanhoe Electric In… (IE) | 100 | 170.65 | +70.6% |
| Kingsoft Cloud Hold… (KC) | 100 | 286.95 | +186.9% |
Ivanhoe Electric In… (IE) returned +59% over 5 years vs Kingsoft Cloud Hold… (KC)'s -78%. A $10,000 investment in IE 5 years ago would be worth $15,917 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivanhoe Electric In… (IE) | $4M | $3M | -13.5% |
| Kingsoft Cloud Hold… (KC) | $2.3B | $7.8B | +237.8% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivanhoe Electric In… (IE) | -6.6% | -32.6% | -397.1% |
| Kingsoft Cloud Hold… (KC) | -45.4% | -25.3% | +44.3% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivanhoe Electric In… (IE) | -0.31 | -0.79 | -154.8% |
| Kingsoft Cloud Hold… (KC) | -33.23 | -8.1 | +75.6% |
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. generated $-93M FCF in 2025 (-41% vs 2021). Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited generated $-3B FCF in 2024 (-112% vs 2021).
IE vs KC: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IE or KC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IE or KC?
Over the past 5 years, Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE) delivered a total return of +59.2%, compared to -77.9% for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC). A $10,000 investment in IE five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IE returned +59.2% versus KC's -43.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IE or KC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.61β versus Ivanhoe Electric Inc.'s 1.75β — meaning IE is approximately 9% more volatile than KC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 94% for Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — IE or KC?
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) is the more profitable company, earning -25.3% net margin versus -32.6% for Ivanhoe Electric Inc. — meaning it keeps -25.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KC leads at -22.3% versus -34.2% for IE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KC leads at 17.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — IE or KC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is IE or KC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Limited (KC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE) carries a higher beta of 1.75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KC: -43.5%, IE: +59.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between IE and KC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.