Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) vs Range Resources Corporation (RRC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | INR | 60.2% revenue growth vs RRC's 32.8% |
| Value | INR | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 11.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | RRC | 9.6% net margin vs INR's -0.6% |
| Stability / Safety | RRC | Beta 0.83 vs INR's 1.05, lower leverage |
| Dividends | RRC | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; INR pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RRC | +12.2% vs INR's -7.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RRC | 8.9% ROA vs INR's -0.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Infinity Natural Resources is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on developing shale resources in the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from selling crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids extracted from its Utica and Marcellus shale acreage in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The company's competitive advantage lies in its concentrated acreage position in prolific shale plays — particularly its approximately 63,000 net acres in the Utica Shale — which provides operational scale and resource density.
Range Resources Corporation is an independent natural gas and oil exploration and production company focused on the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from selling natural gas (~70% of revenue), natural gas liquids (~20%), and oil and condensate (~10%) to utilities, midstream companies, and industrial users. The company's key advantage is its large, low-cost position in the prolific Marcellus Shale — one of North America's most productive natural gas basins — with extensive acreage and established infrastructure.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
RRC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
RRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 22.3x INR's $308M. RRC is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INR's -0.6%. On growth, RRC holds the edge at +6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | INRInfinity Natural … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $308M | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $76M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $658M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$124M | $926M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.0% | +19.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +13.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.1% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.8% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 4.5x trailing earnings, INR trades at a 70% valuation discount to RRC's 15.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RRC's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INR's 4486.8x.
| Metric | INRInfinity Natural … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $751.1B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $751.4B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.46x | 15.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.08x | 11.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4486.84x | 9.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2899.82x | 3.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 2.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRC delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-0 for INR. RRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INR's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRC scores 8/9 vs INR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | INRInfinity Natural … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.2% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.3% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $259M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $204,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $261M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.49x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
Over the past 12 months, RRC leads with a +12.2% total return vs INR's -7.7%.
| Metric | INRInfinity Natural … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.8% | +16.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.7% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +56.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +323.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +80.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +16.2% |
Risk & Volatility
RRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INR's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RRC currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs INR's 83.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | INRInfinity Natural … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.90 | $43.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.13 | $30.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.4% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 153K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INR as "Buy" and RRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.5% upside for INR (target: $20) vs 3.8% for RRC (target: $43). RRC is the only dividend payer here at 0.87% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | INRInfinity Natural … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $42.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jan 25 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | NaN | ∞ | NaN% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 100 | 94.58 | -5.4% |
Infinity Natural Re… (INR) returned +InfinityK% over 5 years vs Range Resources Cor… (RRC)'s +323%. A $10,000 investment in INR 5 years ago would be worth $∞ today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | $143M | $259M | +80.9% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | $1.4B | $3.1B | +128.9% |
Range Resources Corporation's revenue grew from $1.4B (2016) to $3.1B (2025) — a 9.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | 47.6% | 19.0% | -60.0% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | -38.3% | 21.1% | +155.1% |
Range Resources Corporation's net margin went from -38% (2016) to 21% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 6 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 12.7 | 12.9 | +1.6% |
Range Resources Corporation has traded in a 5x–33x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | 1.16 | 3.72 | +220.7% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | -2.75 | 2.74 | +199.6% |
Range Resources Corporation's EPS grew from $-2.75 (2016) to $2.74 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. generated $-78M FCF in 2024 (-156% vs 2022). Range Resources Corporation generated $590M FCF in 2025 (+57% vs 2021).
INR vs RRC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INR or RRC a better buy right now?
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) offers the better valuation at 4.5x trailing P/E (6.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INR or RRC?
On trailing P/E, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) is the cheapest at 4.5x versus Range Resources Corporation at 15.1x. On forward P/E, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6.1x.
03Which is safer — INR or RRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.83β versus Infinity Natural Resources, Inc.'s 1.05β — meaning INR is approximately 26% more volatile than RRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 51% for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — INR or RRC?
Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the more profitable company, earning 21.1% net margin versus 19.0% for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INR leads at 36.2% versus 16.1% for RRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INR leads at 52.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is INR or RRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) trades at 6.1x forward P/E versus 11.9x for Range Resources Corporation — 5.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INR: 20.5% to $20.00.
06Which pays a better dividend — INR or RRC?
In this comparison, RRC (0.9% yield) pays a dividend. INR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is INR or RRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.83), 0.9% yield). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between INR and RRC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. RRC pays a dividend while INR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.