Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Intel Corporation (INTC) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) vs Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) vs Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NVDA | 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -1.1% |
| Value | NVDA | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | NVDA | 55.6% net margin vs AMBQ's -52.1% |
| Stability / Safety | INTC | Beta 1.51 vs AMBQ's 2.81 |
| Dividends | NVDA | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; INTC, AMD, AMBA, AMBQ pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMD | +100.5% vs AMBQ's -20.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NVDA | 58.1% ROA vs AMBQ's -44.9%, ROIC 81.8% vs -104.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Intel is a semiconductor company that designs and manufactures processors and related technologies for computing devices. It generates revenue primarily from selling client computing chips (~50% of sales) and data center processors (~35%), with additional income from networking, memory, and autonomous driving solutions. The company's key advantage is its integrated design-and-manufacturing model—maintaining advanced chip fabrication facilities that few competitors can match.
NVIDIA designs and sells graphics processing units (GPUs) and accelerated computing platforms that power artificial intelligence, gaming, and professional visualization applications. The company generates revenue primarily through its Data Center segment — which includes AI chips and systems — accounting for over 70% of sales, supplemented by its Gaming GPU business and professional visualization offerings. NVIDIA's competitive moat stems from its CUDA software ecosystem — which locks developers into its hardware architecture — and its years of architectural leadership in parallel processing for AI workloads.
Advanced Micro Devices designs and sells high-performance computing and graphics processors for PCs, data centers, gaming consoles, and embedded systems. It generates revenue primarily from sales of CPUs (~50% of revenue) and GPUs (~30%), with the remainder coming from semi-custom chips for game consoles and embedded processors. AMD's key advantage is its competitive x86 CPU architecture and GPU technology that directly challenges market leader Intel in performance-per-dollar across multiple segments.
Ambarella designs specialized computer vision system-on-chips (SoCs) that process high-definition video and run AI algorithms for cameras in automotive, security, and robotics applications. It generates revenue primarily from semiconductor sales—with automotive (around 60%) and security/industrial (around 40%) as its main segments—through direct sales and distribution channels. The company's moat lies in its proprietary AI processor architecture and deep expertise in video compression and computer vision algorithms, which are difficult to replicate.
Ambiq Micro designs ultra-low-power semiconductor chips for battery-powered IoT and wearable devices. It generates revenue primarily from selling its Apollo system-on-chip and Atomiq AI accelerator products — with technical support services as a secondary stream — through a global sales representative network. The company's key advantage is its proprietary subthreshold power-optimized technology that enables significantly longer battery life than conventional chips, creating a strong moat in power-sensitive edge AI applications.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NVDA leads in 5 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). INTC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 2838.8x AMBQ's $76M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBQ's -52.1%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | INTCIntel Corporation | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMDAdvanced Micro De… | AMBAAmbarella, Inc. | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53.9B | $215.9B | $34.6B | $374M | $76M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7.6B | $133.2B | $6.7B | -$72M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $120.1B | $4.3B | -$80M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $221M | $96.7B | $6.7B | $76M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +71.1% | +49.5% | +59.8% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +60.4% | +10.7% | -23.6% | -53.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +55.6% | +12.5% | -21.3% | -52.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +44.8% | +19.4% | +20.3% | -33.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +73.2% | +34.1% | +31.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +123.2% | +97.8% | +2.1% | +39.7% | — |
Valuation Metrics
At 36.2x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 52% valuation discount to AMD's 75.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.38x vs AMD's 14.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | INTCIntel Corporation | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMDAdvanced Micro De… | AMBAAmbarella, Inc. | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $227.8B | $4.31T | $326.3B | $2.6B | $560M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $260.1B | $4.31T | $325.3B | $2.5B | $500M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -558.26x | 36.16x | 75.55x | -21.25x | -9.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 90.62x | 21.88x | 29.55x | 98.34x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x | 14.62x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 39.70x | 32.33x | 48.56x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.31x | 19.94x | 9.42x | 9.12x | 7.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.75x | 27.52x | 5.20x | 4.44x | 4.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.54x | 48.45x | 110.74x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-55 for AMBQ. AMBA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INTC's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs INTC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | INTCIntel Corporation | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMDAdvanced Micro De… | AMBAAmbarella, Inc. | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.0% | +76.3% | +6.9% | -13.5% | -54.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | +58.1% | +5.6% | -10.6% | -44.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +81.8% | +4.7% | -22.5% | -104.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.2% | +97.2% | +5.7% | -22.2% | -53.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.07x | 0.07x | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32.3B | $807M | -$1.1B | -$139M | -$60M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14.3B | $10.6B | $5.5B | $145M | $61M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46.6B | $11.4B | $4.5B | $5M | $966,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.65x | 545.03x | 32.68x | — | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $128,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,079 for AMBA. Over the past 12 months, AMD leads with a +100.5% total return vs AMBQ's -20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 96.9% vs AMBA's -13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | INTCIntel Corporation | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMDAdvanced Micro De… | AMBAAmbarella, Inc. | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | -6.2% | -10.4% | -19.7% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +92.2% | +41.9% | +100.5% | -1.8% | -20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.0% | +663.5% | +154.8% | -36.0% | -20.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.7% | +1181.2% | +131.8% | -49.2% | -20.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.6% | +22525.7% | +9255.6% | +30.0% | -20.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.0% | +96.9% | +36.6% | -13.8% | -7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
INTC is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBQ's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INTC currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs AMBQ's 59.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | INTCIntel Corporation | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMDAdvanced Micro De… | AMBAAmbarella, Inc. | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.73x | 2.08x | 2.14x | 2.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.60 | $212.19 | $267.08 | $96.69 | $51.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.67 | $86.62 | $76.48 | $38.86 | $22.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +83.5% | +75.0% | +62.4% | +59.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 47.4 | 43.4 | 59.6 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 100.1M | 136.2M | 31.0M | 726K | 237K |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INTC as "Hold", NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", AMBA as "Buy", AMBQ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.6% upside for AMBA (target: $98) vs 2.7% for INTC (target: $47).
| Metric | INTCIntel Corporation | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMDAdvanced Micro De… | AMBAAmbarella, Inc. | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.82 | $271.00 | $293.26 | $97.50 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 83 | 79 | 69 | 36 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 87.91 | -12.1% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2,749.78 | +2649.8% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 541.49 | +441.5% |
| Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) | 100 | 105.77 | +5.8% |
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) returned +1.2K% over 5 years vs Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA)'s -49%. A $10,000 investment in NVDA 5 years ago would be worth $128,116 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | $62.8B | $52.9B | -15.8% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | $6.9B | $215.9B | +3025.0% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | $5.3B | $34.6B | +559.4% |
| Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) | $310M | $285M | -8.2% |
| Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) | $51M | $76M | +49.2% |
NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew from $6.9B (2017) to $215.9B (2026) — a 46.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 15.3% | -0.5% | -103.3% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 24.1% | 55.6% | +130.6% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | -0.6% | 12.5% | +2092.2% |
| Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) | 18.6% | -41.1% | -320.7% |
| Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) | -49.5% | -52.1% | -5.4% |
NVIDIA Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2017) to 56% (2026).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 23.2 | 125.6 | +441.4% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 75.6 | 36.2 | -52.1% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 57.7 | 80.8 | +40.0% |
Intel Corporation has traded in a 10x–126x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~-558x. NVIDIA Corporation has traded in a 28x–291x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 1.99 | -0.08 | -104.1% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 0.06 | 4.9 | +7556.3% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | -0.03 | 2.65 | +8933.3% |
| Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) | 1.68 | -2.84 | -269.0% |
| Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) | -1.85 | -3.13 | -69.2% |
NVIDIA Corporation's EPS grew from $0.06 (2017) to $4.90 (2026) — a 62% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Intel Corporation generated $-5B FCF in 2025 (-154% vs 2021). NVIDIA Corporation generated $97B FCF in 2026 (+1960% vs 2021).
INTC vs NVDA vs AMD vs AMBA vs AMBQ: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INTC or NVDA or AMD or AMBA or AMBQ a better buy right now?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 36.2x trailing P/E (21.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INTC or NVDA or AMD or AMBA or AMBQ?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 36.2x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 75.6x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 21.9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0.23x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s 5.72x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INTC or NVDA or AMD or AMBA or AMBQ?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1181%, compared to -49.2% for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth approximately $128K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +225.3% versus AMBQ's -20.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INTC or NVDA or AMD or AMBA or AMBQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intel Corporation (INTC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.51β versus Ambiq Micro, Inc.'s 2.81β — meaning AMBQ is approximately 86% more volatile than INTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 37% for Intel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — INTC or NVDA or AMD or AMBA or AMBQ?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.6% net margin versus -52.1% for Ambiq Micro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60.4% versus -53.4% for AMBQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is INTC or NVDA or AMD or AMBA or AMBQ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.23x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s 5.72x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 21.9x forward P/E versus 98.3x for Ambarella, Inc. — 76.5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMBA: 61.6% to $97.50.
07Which pays a better dividend — INTC or NVDA or AMD or AMBA or AMBQ?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is INTC or NVDA or AMD or AMBA or AMBQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intel Corporation (INTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) carries a higher beta of 2.81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INTC: +86.6%, AMBQ: -20.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between INTC and NVDA and AMD and AMBA and AMBQ?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.