Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Life360, Inc. (LIF) vs Grindr Inc. (GRND) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GRND | 32.7% revenue growth vs LIF's 22.0% |
| Value | GRND | Lower P/E (19.9x vs 37.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | LIF | 6.5% net margin vs GRND's -12.0% |
| Stability / Safety | GRND | Beta 0.72 vs LIF's 1.79 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LIF | +16.5% vs GRND's -38.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LIF | 3.8% ROA vs GRND's -11.2%, ROIC -3.1% vs 34.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Life360 operates a family safety platform that provides location tracking and emergency services through mobile apps and connected devices. It generates revenue primarily through subscription services — including premium app features and hardware warranties — along with hardware sales of Tile tracking devices. The company's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive ecosystem that combines software, hardware, and network effects within family groups.
Grindr operates a social networking and dating app specifically for the LGBTQ+ community. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for premium features — which account for the vast majority of its income — supplemented by advertising on its free tier. Its key advantage is its dominant first-mover position and network effects within the niche gay dating market, creating a self-reinforcing user base.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LIF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GRND leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LIF and GRND operate at a comparable scale, with $459M and $412M in trailing revenue. LIF is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GRND's -12.0%. On growth, LIF holds the edge at +34.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $459M | $412M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $124M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | -$49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $140M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +74.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | -12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +34.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.1% | +29.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +14.3% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GRND's 22.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIF's 1860.9x.
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -833.07x | -15.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.69x | 19.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1860.89x | 22.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.11x | 6.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.59x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 150.21x | 22.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIF delivers a 7.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GRND.
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.6% | -69.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +34.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | +23.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$159M | $235M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $159M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $723,000 | $294M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.24x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
Over the past 12 months, LIF leads with a +16.5% total return vs GRND's -38.0%.
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.2% | -14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.5% | -38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +76.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +6.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +6.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +20.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GRND is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIF's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.54 | $25.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.62 | $9.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.8% | +45.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 870K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LIF as "Buy" and GRND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 83.6% upside for LIF (target: $97) vs 23.0% for GRND (target: $14).
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | GRNDGrindr Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $96.67 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jun 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | NaN | ∞ | NaN% |
| Grindr Inc. (GRND) | 100 | 92.75 | -7.3% |
Life360, Inc. (LIF) returned +InfinityK% over 5 years vs Grindr Inc. (GRND)'s +6%. A $10,000 investment in LIF 5 years ago would be worth $∞ today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | $0.00 | $371M | — |
| Grindr Inc. (GRND) | $104M | $345M | +229.9% |
Life360, Inc.'s revenue grew from $0M (2019) to $371M (2024) — a 0.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2020 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | -20.3% | -1.2% | +93.9% |
| Grindr Inc. (GRND) | -12.5% | -38.0% | -203.7% |
Life360, Inc.'s net margin went from -20% (2020) to -1% (2024). Grindr Inc.'s net margin went from -13% (2020) to -38% (2024).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | -0.84 | -0.06 | +92.5% |
| Grindr Inc. (GRND) | -0.6 | -0.74 | -23.3% |
Life360, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.84 (2019) to $-0.06 (2024).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Life360, Inc. generated $27M FCF in 2024 (+325% vs 2021). Grindr Inc. generated $94M FCF in 2024 (+207% vs 2021).
LIF vs GRND: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIF or GRND a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Life360, Inc. (LIF) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — LIF or GRND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grindr Inc. (GRND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.72β versus Life360, Inc.'s 1.79β — meaning LIF is approximately 149% more volatile than GRND relative to the S&P 500.
03Which has better profit margins — LIF or GRND?
Life360, Inc. (LIF) is the more profitable company, earning -1.2% net margin versus -38.0% for Grindr Inc. — meaning it keeps -1.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GRND leads at 26.9% versus -2.1% for LIF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIF leads at 75.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Is LIF or GRND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grindr Inc. (GRND) trades at 19.9x forward P/E versus 37.7x for Life360, Inc. — 17.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LIF: 83.6% to $96.67.
05Which pays a better dividend — LIF or GRND?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is LIF or GRND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grindr Inc. (GRND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.72)). Life360, Inc. (LIF) carries a higher beta of 1.79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between LIF and GRND?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.