Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Life360, Inc. (LIF) vs Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LIF | 22.0% revenue growth vs SOGP's -1.9% |
| Value | SOGP | Lower P/E (0.5x vs 37.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | LIF | 6.5% net margin vs SOGP's -3.4% |
| Stability / Safety | SOGP | Beta 1.64 vs LIF's 1.79 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SOGP | +6.0% vs LIF's +16.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LIF | 3.8% ROA vs SOGP's -12.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Life360 operates a family safety platform that provides location tracking and emergency services through mobile apps and connected devices. It generates revenue primarily through subscription services — including premium app features and hardware warranties — along with hardware sales of Tile tracking devices. The company's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive ecosystem that combines software, hardware, and network effects within family groups.
Sound Group operates an audio-centric social entertainment platform where users connect through voice-based interactions. It generates revenue primarily through virtual gifting within its live audio rooms — where listeners purchase digital gifts for creators — and advertising on its platform. The company's moat lies in its early-mover advantage in China's audio social space and its proprietary audio technology infrastructure.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LIF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SOGP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
SOGP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 4.4x LIF's $459M. LIF is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOGP's -3.4%.
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | SOGPSound Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $459M | $2.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.7% | +27.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | -1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | — |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | SOGPSound Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $10.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -833.07x | -6.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.69x | 0.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1860.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.11x | 35.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.59x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 150.21x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIF delivers a 7.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-28 for SOGP. LIF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SOGP's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIF scores 6/9 vs SOGP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | SOGPSound Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.6% | -27.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -12.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | -35.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$159M | -$422M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $159M | $442M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $723,000 | $20M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -215.63x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
Over the past 12 months, SOGP leads with a +604.9% total return vs LIF's +16.5%.
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | SOGPSound Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.2% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.5% | +604.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +91.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -84.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -86.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +24.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SOGP is the less volatile stock with a 1.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIF's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIF currently trades 46.8% from its 52-week high vs SOGP's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | SOGPSound Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.54 | $37.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.62 | $1.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.8% | +37.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 870K | 81K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | LIFLife360, Inc. | SOGPSound Group Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $96.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jun 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | NaN | ∞ | NaN% |
| Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) | 100 | 647.87 | +547.9% |
Life360, Inc. (LIF) returned +InfinityK% over 5 years vs Sound Group Inc. (SOGP)'s -84%. A $10,000 investment in LIF 5 years ago would be worth $∞ today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | $0.00 | $371M | — |
| Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) | $454M | $2.0B | +348.0% |
Sound Group Inc.'s revenue grew from $454M (2017) to $2.0B (2024) — a 23.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | -20.3% | -1.2% | +93.9% |
| Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) | -33.9% | -3.4% | +89.9% |
Sound Group Inc.'s net margin went from -34% (2017) to -3% (2024).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life360, Inc. (LIF) | -0.84 | -0.06 | +92.5% |
| Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) | -54.9 | -14 | +74.5% |
Sound Group Inc.'s EPS grew from $-54.90 (2017) to $-14.00 (2024).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Life360, Inc. generated $27M FCF in 2024 (+325% vs 2021). Sound Group Inc. generated $-39M FCF in 2024 (+37% vs 2021).
LIF vs SOGP: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIF or SOGP a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Life360, Inc. (LIF) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — LIF or SOGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.64β versus Life360, Inc.'s 1.79β — meaning LIF is approximately 9% more volatile than SOGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Life360, Inc. (LIF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Sound Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which has better profit margins — LIF or SOGP?
Life360, Inc. (LIF) is the more profitable company, earning -1.2% net margin versus -3.4% for Sound Group Inc. — meaning it keeps -1.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIF leads at -2.1% versus -4.4% for SOGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIF leads at 75.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Is LIF or SOGP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) trades at 0.5x forward P/E versus 37.7x for Life360, Inc. — 37.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
05Which pays a better dividend — LIF or SOGP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is LIF or SOGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Life360, Inc. (LIF) carries a higher beta of 1.79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between LIF and SOGP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.