Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LMFA | 77.7% revenue growth vs JPM's 14.6% |
| Quality / Margins | JPM | 21.6% net margin vs LMFA's -66.5% |
| Stability / Safety | JPM | Beta 1.00 vs LMFA's 1.82 |
| Dividends | JPM | 1.7% yield; 14-year raise streak; LMFA pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | JPM | +15.7% vs LMFA's -75.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | JPM | 1.3% ROA vs LMFA's -12.3%, ROIC 5.4% vs -12.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
LM Funding America is a specialty finance company that purchases delinquent homeowner association assessment accounts from community associations. It generates revenue primarily by collecting on these purchased delinquent accounts — typically through payment plans or legal action — and earns interest and fees on the amounts recovered. The company's key advantage lies in its specialized expertise in HOA collections and its New Neighbor Guaranty program, which provides associations with upfront payments for delinquent accounts.
JPMorgan Chase is a global financial services giant that operates as a universal bank offering consumer banking, investment banking, commercial banking, and asset management services. It generates revenue primarily through net interest income from lending activities (about 50% of total revenue) and non-interest income from investment banking fees, trading, asset management, and card services. The company's key competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, diversified revenue streams, and fortress balance sheet—which together create significant barriers to entry and provide stability through economic cycles.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LMFA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 24618.0x LMFA's $11M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMFA's -66.5%.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$264,638 | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.7% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -66.5% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -124.4% | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LMFA's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 13.1x.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $809.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.14x | 15.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.70x | 13.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 2.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-15 for LMFA. LMFA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs LMFA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.3% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.3% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.4% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.92x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,449 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for LMFA. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +15.7% total return vs LMFA's -75.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 30.0% vs LMFA's -63.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.8% | -7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.2% | +15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | +119.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +114.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | +497.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.8% | +30.0% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMFA's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs LMFA's 7.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.14 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $202.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.3% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 372K | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $336.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LM Funding America,… (LMFA) | 100 | 1.41 | -98.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 253.57 | +153.6% |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) returned +114% over 5 years vs LM Funding America,… (LMFA)'s -99%. A $10,000 investment in JPM 5 years ago would be worth $21,449 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LM Funding America,… (LMFA) | $7M | $11M | +58.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | $101.0B | $270.8B | +168.1% |
LM Funding America, Inc.'s revenue grew from $7M (2015) to $11M (2024) — a 5.2% CAGR. JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s revenue grew from $101.0B (2015) to $270.8B (2024) — a 11.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LM Funding America,… (LMFA) | 24.9% | -66.5% | -367.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 24.2% | 21.6% | -10.8% |
LM Funding America, Inc.'s net margin went from 25% (2015) to -67% (2024). JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s net margin went from 24% (2015) to 22% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 16.9 | 12.1 | -28.4% |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. has traded in a 10x–17x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LM Funding America,… (LMFA) | -0.5 | -2.61 | -422.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 6 | 19.75 | +229.2% |
LM Funding America, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.50 (2015) to $-2.61 (2024). JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s EPS grew from $6.00 (2015) to $19.75 (2024) — a 14% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
LM Funding America, Inc. generated $-14M FCF in 2024 (+7% vs 2021). JPMorgan Chase & Co. generated $-42B FCF in 2024 (-154% vs 2021).
LMFA vs JPM: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LMFA or JPM a better buy right now?
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15.2x trailing P/E (13.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LMFA or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) delivered a total return of +114.5%, compared to -99.2% for LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA). A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +497.7% versus LMFA's +20.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LMFA or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.00β versus LM Funding America, Inc.'s 1.82β — meaning LMFA is approximately 81% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — LMFA or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21.6% net margin versus -66.5% for LM Funding America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27.7% versus -58.7% for LMFA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 58.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — LMFA or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.7% yield) pays a dividend. LMFA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is LMFA or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.00), 1.7% yield, +497.7% 10Y return). LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA) carries a higher beta of 1.82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +497.7%, LMFA: +20.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between LMFA and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: LMFA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while LMFA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.