Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants (LOTWW) vs Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares (LOT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LOT | 36.1% revenue growth vs LOTWW's 36.0% |
| Quality / Margins | LOTWW | -45.6% net margin vs LOT's -119.2% |
| Stability / Safety | LOT | Beta 1.31 vs LOTWW's 2.16 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LOTWW | -29.3% vs LOT's -46.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LOTWW | -12.6% ROA vs LOT's -48.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Lotus Technology is a luxury electric vehicle manufacturer that designs and sells high-performance sports cars and SUVs. It generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales — including its Eletre SUV and Emeya sedan — with additional income from software services and charging infrastructure. The company leverages its iconic British sports car heritage and engineering pedigree — dating back to 1948 — to command premium pricing in the luxury EV segment.
Lotus Technology is a luxury electric vehicle manufacturer that designs and sells high-performance sports cars and SUVs. It generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales — with its Eletre SUV and Emeya sedan as flagship models — supplemented by charging services and software subscriptions. The company leverages its iconic British sports car heritage and engineering pedigree — now electrified — to command premium pricing in the luxury EV segment.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LOT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). LOTWW leads in 1 (Financial Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $924M annually — 1.9x LOTWW's $494M. LOTWW is the more profitable business, keeping -45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOT's -119.2%.
| Metric | LOTWWLotus Technology … | LOTLotus Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $494M | $924M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$572M | -$713M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$225M | -$1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$601M | -$906M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +3.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -47.8% | -85.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.6% | -119.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -121.8% | -98.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.8% | -32.7% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LOTWWLotus Technology … | LOTLotus Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $47M | $778M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $752M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -0.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.05x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | LOTWWLotus Technology … | LOTLotus Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.6% | -48.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $704M | $704M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $482M | $482M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -90.49x | -18.02x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in LOT five years ago would be worth $1,060 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $972 for LOTWW. Over the past 12 months, LOTWW leads with a -29.3% total return vs LOT's -46.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOT at -52.7% vs LOTWW's -54.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LOTWWLotus Technology … | LOTLotus Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | -19.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.3% | -46.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -89.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -89.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -89.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.0% | -52.7% |
Risk & Volatility
LOT is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOTWW's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOT currently trades 41.8% from its 52-week high vs LOTWW's 34.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LOTWWLotus Technology … | LOTLotus Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.16x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.20 | $2.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.05 | $1.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.1% | +41.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 169K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | LOTWWLotus Technology … | LOTLotus Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lotus Technology In… (LOTWW) | 100 | 9.72 | -90.3% |
| Lotus Technology In… (LOT) | 100 | 15.02 | -85.0% |
Lotus Technology In… (LOT) returned -89% over 5 years vs Lotus Technology In… (LOTWW)'s -90%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lotus Technology In… (LOTWW) | $4M | $924M | +24970.5% |
| Lotus Technology In… (LOT) | $4M | $924M | +24970.5% |
Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants's revenue grew from $4M (2021) to $924M (2024) — a 530.6% CAGR. Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares's revenue grew from $4M (2021) to $924M (2024) — a 530.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lotus Technology In… (LOTWW) | 148.9% | -119.5% | -180.2% |
| Lotus Technology In… (LOT) | -30.0% | -119.5% | -298.5% |
Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants's net margin went from 149% (2021) to -119% (2024). Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares's net margin went from -30% (2021) to -119% (2024).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lotus Technology In… (LOTWW) | 0.15 | -1.72 | -1246.7% |
| Lotus Technology In… (LOT) | -0.33 | -1.72 | -421.2% |
Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants's EPS grew from $0.15 (2021) to $-1.72 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR. Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares's EPS grew from $-0.33 (2021) to $-1.72 (2024).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants generated $-906M FCF in 2024 (-2429% vs 2021). Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares generated $-906M FCF in 2024 (-462% vs 2021).
LOTWW vs LOT: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — LOTWW or LOT?
Over the past 5 years, Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares (LOT) delivered a total return of -89.4%, compared to -90.3% for Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants (LOTWW). A $10,000 investment in LOT five years ago would be worth approximately $1K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOT returned -89.4% versus LOTWW's -90.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — LOTWW or LOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares (LOT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.31β versus Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants's 2.16β — meaning LOTWW is approximately 64% more volatile than LOT relative to the S&P 500.
03Which has better profit margins — LOTWW or LOT?
Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants (LOTWW) is the more profitable company, earning -119.5% net margin versus -119.5% for Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps -119.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOTWW leads at -85.1% versus -85.1% for LOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOTWW leads at 3.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — LOTWW or LOT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is LOTWW or LOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares (LOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants (LOTWW) carries a higher beta of 2.16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOT: -89.4%, LOTWW: -90.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between LOTWW and LOT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.