Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) vs Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PFAI | 56.6% revenue growth vs LOW's 3.1% |
| Value | LOW | Lower P/E (21.0x vs 106.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | PFAI | 8.7% net margin vs LOW's 7.7% |
| Dividends | LOW | 1.8% yield; 16-year raise streak; PFAI pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LOW | +8.3% vs PFAI's -43.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LOW | 12.3% ROA vs PFAI's 6.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Lowe's is a major home improvement retailer that sells products for construction, maintenance, repair, remodeling, and decorating through its physical stores and online channels. It generates revenue primarily from retail sales of national brand-name merchandise and private label products — with professional customers representing a growing segment — along with installation services and extended protection plans. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive store network, strong brand recognition, and scale advantages in procurement and distribution.
Pinnacle Food Group is a Canadian company that designs and sells smart hydroponic growing systems for households, community groups, and urban farms. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales of its tailored hydroponic systems — supplemented by technical support services and data-driven optimization tools. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated hardware-software ecosystem that enables users to optimize farming productivity through data analytics and tailored support.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PFAI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LOW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $86.3B annually — 26227.8x PFAI's $3M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.7% (PFAI) to 7.7% (LOW).
| Metric | LOWLowe's Companies,… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86.3B | $3M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12.3B | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.7B | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.7B | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +18.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +8.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | -27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
At 22.3x trailing earnings, LOW trades at a 79% valuation discount to PFAI's 106.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LOW's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFAI's 17.5x.
| Metric | LOWLowe's Companies,… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $148.2B | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $154.4B | $17M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.33x | 106.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.96x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.52x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.76x | 17.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 5.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 47.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.36x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | LOWLowe's Companies,… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +61.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.3% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +76.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.6% | +34.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.2B | -$523,124 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $982M | $685,796 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.2B | $162,672 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.90x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth $17,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,625 for PFAI. Over the past 12 months, LOW leads with a +8.3% total return vs PFAI's -43.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOW at 10.6% vs PFAI's -17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LOWLowe's Companies,… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.6% | +3.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.3% | -43.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.2% | -43.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.1% | -43.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +335.9% | -43.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.6% | -17.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PFAI is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOW's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOW currently trades 90.3% from its 52-week high vs PFAI's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LOWLowe's Companies,… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $293.06 | $4.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $206.39 | $1.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.3% | +45.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 17K |
Analyst Outlook
LOW is the only dividend payer here at 1.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | LOWLowe's Companies,… | PFAIPinnacle Food Gro… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $289.77 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | $65.0B | $86.3B | +32.7% |
| Pinnacle Food Group… (PFAI) | $177326.00 | $3M | +1755.3% |
Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s revenue grew from $65.0B (2016) to $86.3B (2025) — a 3.2% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 4.8% | 7.7% | +62.2% |
| Pinnacle Food Group… (PFAI) | -115.7% | 8.7% | +107.5% |
Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s net margin went from 5% (2016) to 8% (2025).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 22.7 | 20.4 | -10.1% |
Lowe's Companies, Inc. has traded in a 17x–32x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~22x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 3.47 | 11.85 | +241.5% |
| Pinnacle Food Group… (PFAI) | -0.01 | 0.02 | +256.3% |
Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s EPS grew from $3.47 (2016) to $11.85 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Lowe's Companies, Inc. generated $8B FCF in 2025 (-7% vs 2021). Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares generated $-1M FCF in 2024 (-729% vs 2022).
LOW vs PFAI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOW or PFAI a better buy right now?
Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) offers the better valuation at 22.3x trailing P/E (21.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOW or PFAI?
On trailing P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the cheapest at 22.3x versus Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares at 106.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOW or PFAI?
Over the past 5 years, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) delivered a total return of +76.1%, compared to -43.8% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI). A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth approximately $18K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOW returned +335.9% versus PFAI's -43.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOW or PFAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the lower-risk stock at -0.01β versus Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s 0.61β — meaning LOW is approximately -4948% more volatile than PFAI relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — LOW or PFAI?
Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the more profitable company, earning 8.7% net margin versus 7.7% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFAI leads at 18.7% versus 11.8% for LOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFAI leads at 47.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LOW or PFAI?
In this comparison, LOW (1.8% yield) pays a dividend. PFAI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LOW or PFAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.61), 1.8% yield, +335.9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOW: +335.9%, PFAI: -43.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LOW and PFAI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. LOW pays a dividend while PFAI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.