Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) vs GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LPL | 24.8% revenue growth vs GPRO's -20.3% |
| Value | LPL | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 19.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | LPL | -1.3% net margin vs GPRO's -18.7% |
| Stability / Safety | LPL | Beta 0.81 vs GPRO's 1.56 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LPL | +54.3% vs GPRO's +29.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LPL | -1.2% ROA vs GPRO's -22.6%, ROIC -1.9% vs -32.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
LG Display is a leading manufacturer of display panels using TFT-LCD and OLED technologies for consumer electronics and automotive applications. It generates revenue primarily from panel sales to TV makers (~40%), mobile device manufacturers (~30%), and automotive/industrial customers (~20%), with the remainder from monitors and other displays. The company's competitive advantage lies in its advanced OLED manufacturing expertise—particularly for large-screen TVs—and its deep integration with the LG Electronics ecosystem.
GoPro is a consumer electronics company that designs and sells durable, mountable action cameras and accessories for capturing immersive first-person footage. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales — cameras (~70% of revenue) and mounts/accessories (~20%) — supplemented by subscription services (~10%) for cloud storage, editing software, and camera protection. The company's competitive moat lies in its strong brand recognition among action sports enthusiasts and its ecosystem of compatible mounts and accessories that create switching costs for users.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LPL leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.44T annually — 40633.2x GPRO's $651M. LPL is the more profitable business, keeping -1.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPRO's -18.7%. On growth, LPL holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | GPROGoPro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.44T | $651M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.02T | -$107M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$335.3B | -$122M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.02T | -$65M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +34.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | -18.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -9.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | -37.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.2% | -143.4% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | GPROGoPro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.8B | $45M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.69x | -0.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 19.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.36x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 0.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.70x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LPL delivers a -4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-151 for GPRO. GPRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.81x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LPL's 1.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LPL scores 6/9 vs GPRO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | GPROGoPro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.2% | -151.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.2% | -22.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | -32.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | -30.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.81x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.59T | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.02T | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.61T | $122M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.80x | -19.02x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in LPL five years ago would be worth $5,327 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,188 for GPRO. Over the past 12 months, LPL leads with a +54.3% total return vs GPRO's +29.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LPL at -4.6% vs GPRO's -42.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | GPROGoPro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.1% | -33.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.3% | +29.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.1% | -81.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.7% | -88.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.9% | -91.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.6% | -42.9% |
Risk & Volatility
LPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPRO's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LPL currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs GPRO's 31.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | GPROGoPro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.67 | $3.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.43 | $0.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +31.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 84.9 | 33.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 602K | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LPL as "Hold" and GPRO as "Hold".
| Metric | LPLLG Display Co., L… | GPROGoPro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) | 100 | 66.27 | -33.7% |
| GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) | 100 | 28.61 | -71.4% |
LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) returned -47% over 5 years vs GoPro, Inc. (GPRO)'s -88%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) | $28.4T | $26.6T | -6.2% |
| GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) | $1.6B | $801M | -50.5% |
LG Display Co., Ltd.'s revenue grew from $28.4T (2015) to $26.6T (2024) — a -0.7% CAGR. GoPro, Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.6B (2015) to $801M (2024) — a -7.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) | 3.4% | -9.6% | -382.7% |
| GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) | 2.2% | -53.9% | -2518.5% |
LG Display Co., Ltd.'s net margin went from 3% (2015) to -10% (2024). GoPro, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2015) to -54% (2024).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) | 1,350.5 | -2,719 | -301.3% |
| GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) | 0.25 | -2.82 | -1228.0% |
LG Display Co., Ltd.'s EPS grew from $1350.50 (2015) to $-2719.00 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR. GoPro, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.25 (2015) to $-2.82 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
LG Display Co., Ltd. generated $308B FCF in 2024 (-89% vs 2021). GoPro, Inc. generated $-129M FCF in 2024 (-158% vs 2021).
LPL vs GPRO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPL or GPRO a better buy right now?
Analysts rate LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LPL or GPRO?
Over the past 5 years, LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) delivered a total return of -46.7%, compared to -88.1% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). A $10,000 investment in LPL five years ago would be worth approximately $5K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LPL returned -38.9% versus GPRO's -91.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LPL or GPRO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.81β versus GoPro, Inc.'s 1.56β — meaning GPRO is approximately 93% more volatile than LPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 81% versus 181% for LG Display Co., Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — LPL or GPRO?
LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) is the more profitable company, earning -9.6% net margin versus -53.9% for GoPro, Inc. — meaning it keeps -9.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LPL leads at -2.1% versus -16.8% for GPRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPRO leads at 33.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is LPL or GPRO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) trades at 0.0x forward P/E versus 19.4x for GoPro, Inc. — 19.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
06Which pays a better dividend — LPL or GPRO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LPL or GPRO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.81)). GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) carries a higher beta of 1.56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LPL: -38.9%, GPRO: -91.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LPL and GPRO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.